Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
regulation of wind energy systems and granting rule-making authority.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not
place any restrictions on the installation or use of an energy system (a solar energy
system or a wind energy system) unless the restriction is for health or safety reasons,
does not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency, or
allows for an alternative comparable system. Current law defines "wind energy
system" as equipment that converts and then stores or transfers energy from the
wind into usable forms of energy.
This bill requires the Public Service Commission (PSC) to promulgate rules
establishing common standards for political subdivisions to regulate the
construction and operation of wind energy systems. The bill also revises the
definition of "wind energy system" to include associated facilities of the equipment
specified under current law. The PSC's rules must specify the restrictions a political
subdivision may impose on the installation or use of such a system, and may include
subjects such as visual appearance, setback distances, decommissioning, shadow
flicker, electrical connections to the power grid, and interference with radio,
telephone, or television signals. The PSC must also promulgate rules specifying
requirements and procedures for a political subdivision to enforce such restrictions.
If a political subdivision chooses to regulate such systems, its ordinances may
not be more restrictive than the PSC rules. The bill also specifies various standards,
procedures for applicants, and approval timelines for political subdivisions that
must be contained in a political subdivision's ordinance regulating the systems.
The bill prohibits a political subdivision from prohibiting or restricting any
person from conducting tests to determine the suitability of a site for the possible
placement of a wind energy system, although the political subdivision may petition
the PSC to impose reasonable restrictions on the testing.
With regard to a proposed wind energy system that is one megawatt or larger,
the bill provides that any person who is aggrieved by a political subdivision's decision
or enforcement action may seek review by the PSC. If the PSC determines that the
political subdivision's decision or enforcement action does not comply with the
agency's rules or is unreasonable, it must issue a superseding decision and order an
appropriate remedy. The PSC's decision or order may be appealed to circuit court.
The bill specifies that if a county enacts an ordinance relating to the
construction or operation of a wind energy system, as provided by the bill, the county
ordinance applies only in the unincorporated parts of the county, except that if a town
enacts a similar ordinance, the more restrictive terms of the two ordinances apply
to the town.
Finally, the bill does not affect a provision under current law that exempts
certain electric generating facilities from local ordinances. Under current law, a
person may not construct an electric generating facility with a nominal operating
capacity of 100 megawatts or more unless the PSC grants a certificate of public
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
Passed 7–0 Aug 5, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 23, Noes 9
Passed 23–9 Sep 15, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 65, Noes 31, Paired 2
Passed 65–31 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 47
Passed 50–47 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 42
Passed 56–42 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 48
Passed 50–48 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 48
Passed 50–48 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Refused to table Assembly amendment 6, Ayes 49, Noes 49
Failed 49–49 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 36
Passed 62–36 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 37
Passed 61–37 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 48
Passed 50–48 Sep 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- May 4, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Plale, Hopper, Hansen, Holperin, Kreitlow, Taylor, Sullivan, Miller, Risser, Wirch and Coggs;Cosponsored by Representatives Soletski, Montgomery, Parisi, Black, Mason, Spanbauer, Hilgenberg, Roys, Townsend, Richards, Suder, Honadel, Pocan, Clark, Wood, Smith, Pasch, Vruwink, Molepske Jr. and Stone
- May 4, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- May 12, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- May 12, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 4, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Aug 5, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Aug 5, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Aug 5, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- Aug 5, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- Aug 5, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- Aug 5, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 3 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- Aug 5, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Aug 17, 2009 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)
- Sep 8, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 9-15-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Sep 14, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Plale
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a coauthor
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 3 offered by Senator Schultz
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 3 withdrawn and returned to author
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 23, Noes 9
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Read
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from Senate message and place on calendar 9-16-2009
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Ripp
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Davis
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 47
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Davis
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 42
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Davis
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 48
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representatives Huebsch and Ripp
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 48
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representatives Huebsch and Ripp
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Refused to table Assembly amendment 6, Ayes 49, Noes 49
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Refused to adopt Assembly amendment 6, Ayes 49, Noes 49
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representative Wood
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 36
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representative Krusick
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 37
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 9 offered by Representatives Krusick and Ballweg
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 48
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 65, Noes 31, Paired 2
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 17, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Sep 21, 2009 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 9-21-2009
- Sep 29, 2009 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 9-29-2009
- Oct 1, 2009 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 9-30-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 40
- Oct 7, 2009 · Senate
Published 10-14-2009.