Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 204

Prohibiting discrimination in housing because of domestic abuse victim status and providing a penalty

Topics: Crime and criminals, Discrimination in housing, Landlord and tenant, Sex crimes, Women

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 11, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 14, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2009

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 95

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 15, 2009: “Published 12-28-2009.”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of sex, race, color, sexual orientation, disability, religion, national origin, marital status, family status, lawful source of income, age, or ancestry (protected class). A person who engages in an act of housing discrimination may be required to provide such relief as may be appropriate, including economic and noneconomic damages and injunctive or other equitable relief, and to pay a forfeiture of not more than $10,000, except that a person who is not a natural person may be required to pay a forfeiture of not more than $25,000 if the person has committed a previous act of housing discrimination within the preceding five years or a forfeiture of not more than $50,000 if the person has committed two or more previous acts of housing discrimination within the preceding seven years.

Current law also prohibits a mortgage banker, loan originator, or mortgage broker from treating a person unequally based on the person's membership in a protected class. In addition, current law prohibits a real estate broker, real estate salesperson, or time-share salesperson from treating a person unequally based on the person's sex, race, color, handicap, national origin, ancestry, marital status, or lawful source of income.

Read the full summary

Current law, however, does not prohibit an owner of housing from requiring that a person who is seeking to buy or rent housing supply information concerning the person's family status, marital status, and financial and business status, but does prohibit an owner from requiring information concerning a person's race, color, disability, sexual orientation, ancestry, national origin, religion, creed, or, subject to an exception for housing for older persons, age.

This bill prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of a person's status as a victim of domestic abuse, sexual assault, or stalking, which is defined in the bill as the status of a person who is seeking to rent or purchase housing or of a member or prospective member of the person's household having been, or being believed by the lessor or seller of housing to be, a victim of domestic abuse, sexual assault, sexual assault of a child, repeated sexual assault of a child, or stalking. The bill also prohibits an owner of housing from requiring that a person seeking to buy or rent housing supply information concerning the person's status as a victim of domestic abuse, sexual assault, or stalking.

"Domestic abuse" is defined under current law as the intentional infliction of physical pain, physical injury, or illness, the intentional impairment of physical condition, sexual assault, criminal damage to property, or a threat to engage in any of that conduct, by an adult family member or household member against another adult family member or household member, by an adult caregiver against an adult who is under the caregiver's care, or by an adult against his or her former spouse, an adult with whom he or she has or has had a dating relationship, or an adult with whom he or she has a child in common.

Who's behind it

10 senators are its ⁠. All 10 are Democrats.

25 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 35 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (25)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 15, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 11, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 95.

  3. Dec 8, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 5, 2009

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Nov 5, 2009

    “Read” (the official wording)

  6. Nov 5, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Oct 29, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Oct 29, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Oct 7, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Jul 13, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Jun 5, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Jun 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. May 14, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  16. May 14, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 14, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Coggs, Taylor, Carpenter, Risser, Hansen, Holperin, Erpenbach, Plale, Sullivan and Lehman;Cosponsored by Representatives Parisi, Suder, Seidel, A. Ott, Pocan, Van Roy, Young, Tauchen, Sherman, Petrowski, Grigsby, Wood, Roys, Spanbauer, Berceau, Hebl, Nygren, Pasch, Pope-Roberts, Zepnick, Shilling, Milroy, Sinicki, Toles and Dexter

  2. May 14, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Jun 2, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 5, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jul 13, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Oct 1, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Coggs

  7. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  8. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  13. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  15. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read

  21. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  22. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Nov 6, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Nov 12, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-12-2009

  29. Dec 8, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-8-2009

  30. Dec 11, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-10-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 95

  31. Dec 15, 2009 · Senate

    Published 12-28-2009.

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote