Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 206

Recording and filing documents with the register of deeds

Topics: Data processing, Financial Institutions, Department of, Mineral rights, Register of deeds

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 18, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the register of deeds may not record any document unless it complies with certain formatting requirements. Among these is a requirement that the bottom and side margins of the first page of a document to be recorded are at least 0.25 inches.

This bill requires that the bottom and side margins of every page of the document to be recorded are at least 0.25 inches. This bill also permits the register of deeds to return without recording an entire group of related documents representing one transaction when any single document within the group is improperly formatted.

Read the full summary

Current law requires a register of deeds to record conveyances of mineral interests in a register of mineral rights. The bill requires that a register of deeds record conveyances of mineral interests in the index in which the register of deeds records real estate transactions.

Current law provides that a register of deeds may accept electronic documents for recording. The bill provides that any electronic document that is properly indexed in a public index maintained by the register of deeds shall be considered recorded even if the electronic document does not satisfy all of the requirements set forth in the statutes for recording. A similar provision applies under current law to paper documents.

Under current law, a common law trust must meet certain requirements in order to lawfully transact business in the state. Among these are requirements that a declaration of trust be filed with the register of deeds and that a certificate be provided to the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) stating the time when the declaration was filed. The register of deeds is required to charge 25 cents for providing a certificate to DFI. Under this bill, the register of deeds must charge $1 for providing a certificate to DFI.

Who's behind it

7 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

13 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (13)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 21, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 21, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  3. Sep 30, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Sep 17, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Jun 12, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. May 18, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations.

  7. May 18, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 18, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Hansen, Risser, Kedzie, Lehman, Schultz, Taylor and Cowles;Cosponsored by Representatives Soletski, Zigmunt, Berceau, Danou, Huebsch, Petrowski, Steinbrink, Strachota, Townsend, Turner, Van Roy, Vos and Vruwink

  2. May 18, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations

  3. Jun 12, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 21, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 21, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Oct 21, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote