Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 208

Regulation of persons who sell dogs or operate animal shelters or animal control facilities, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Animal: Treatment, Dogs, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 18, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Licensing of dog sellers, animal shelters, and animal control facilities This bill requires certain persons who sell dogs or operate animal shelters or animal control facilities to be licensed by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP), beginning 18 months after the bill is enacted into law.

The bill requires all of the following to obtain licenses, with limited exceptions:

Read the full summary

1. A person who sells 25 or more dogs in a year (including a nonresident who brings dogs into this state for sale).

2. A person who operates a dog breeding facility (a place at which dogs are bred and raised) from which 25 or more dogs are sold in a year.

3. A person who operates an auction at which 50 or more dogs are sold or offered for sale in a year.

4. A person who operates an animal shelter that is used to shelter at least 25 dogs in a year.

5. A person who operates an animal control facility under a contract with a city, village, town, or county.

The bill requires DATCP to inspect each location in this state at which a person who applies for a license operates before issuing an initial license and at least once every two years thereafter, except that during the first 12 months in which licenses are required DATCP may issue a temporary initial license before conducting the required inspection. The bill allows DATCP to make additional inspections during regular business hours to ensure compliance with requirements established in the bill.

The bill specifies fees for licenses, generally based on the number of dogs sold, and authorizes DATCP to set higher fees by rule if necessary to cover the costs of administering the program.

Sale of dogs This bill prohibits a licensee from transferring a dog to a buyer before the dog is seven weeks old. The bill requires a licensee to provide the purchaser of a dog with a copy of the dog's vaccination records and with a statement from a veterinarian who examined the dog stating that the dog had no infectious or contagious diseases at the time of examination.

The bill prohibits any person from selling at auction a dog that is not spayed or neutered unless the dog has tested negative for brucellosis.

The bill also requires a person who sells or offers to sell a dog at a temporary dog market, such as a flea market, to provide information about the dog to the operator of the temporary dog market. It requires the operator of a temporary dog market to register with DATCP, review and keep the information provided by sellers, and, if dogs are sold or offered for sale on two or more consecutive days, have a veterinarian examine the dogs.

Standards of care The bill requires licensees to provide dogs with adequate food, water, veterinary care, shelter, and opportunity for exercise. The bill requires enclosures for dogs to be of appropriate size and structurally sound. It requires licensees to keep enclosures clean and to follow restrictions on the use of wire flooring. Under the bill, a licensee must ensure that each dog is observed every day in order to monitor the health and temperament of the dog and provide care as needed.

Enforcement and administration A person who fails to obtain a license required under this bill may be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than nine months or both. Violations of other requirements in the bill are punishable by forfeitures (civil monetary penalties). The bill authorizes the use of a citation, which is similar to a traffic ticket, in case of a violation that is punishable by a forfeiture.

The bill provides DATCP with authority to deny, revoke, or refuse to renew a license for cause. It also authorizes DATCP to summarily suspend a license if an inspection reveals a condition that imminently threatens an animal or there is evidence that an animal has been criminally mistreated.

The bill authorizes DATCP to seize a dog from a person required to be licensed if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the dog is being criminally mistreated.

The bill requires DATCP to promulgate rules for the administration of the program. It also requires DATCP to appoint an advisory committee for the rule making.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

19 senators are its ⁠. 11 are Democrats and 8 are Republicans.

54 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 73 names

Authors (19)

Signed on in support (54)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Small Business vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 16 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 5, 2009

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  3. Oct 29, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.

  4. Oct 29, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  5. Oct 29, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Oct 22, 2009

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  7. Oct 14, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  8. Oct 14, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  9. Oct 14, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  10. Sep 23, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Jun 18, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  12. Jun 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. May 18, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection.

  14. May 18, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 18, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Darling, Taylor, Plale, Carpenter, Sullivan, Holperin, S. Fitzgerald, Risser, Lehman, Cowles, Olsen, A. Lasee, Kanavas, Hansen, Wirch, Kapanke, Coggs and Leibham;Cosponsored by Representatives Smith, Sinicki, Richards, Jorgensen, Dexter, Wood, Bernard Schaber, Pope-Roberts, Berceau, Barca, Pocan, Colon, Mason, Shilling, Sherman, Grigsby, Cullen, Seidel, Staskunas, Molepske Jr., Soletski, Honadel, Steinbrink, Van Roy, Van Akkeren, Pasch, Benedict, Turner, Black, Spanbauer, Zepnick, Schneider, Fields, J. Ott, A. Ott, Hilgenberg, Zigmunt, Young, Parisi, Gottlieb, Hebl, Roys, A. Williams, Montgomery, Hixson, Stone, Bies, Zipperer, Kestell, Davis and Pridemore

  2. May 18, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection

  3. Jun 3, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 18, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Schultz added as a coauthor

  5. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Kreitlow

  6. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Kreitlow

  8. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  13. Oct 22, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  14. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  15. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  16. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  17. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  18. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  20. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Hopper added as a coauthor

  21. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a coauthor

  22. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Laid on the table

  24. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote