Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 218

Penalties and private actions for violations of restrictions on telephone solicitations

Topics: Damage (personal injury), Telephone

Passed both chambers, then stopped

The Senate and the Assembly both voted to pass it, but it never went to the governor. A bill goes to the governor only after both chambers ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 26, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Sep 15, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 22, 2010

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Stopped here. It never went to the governor.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law regulates telephone solicitation, defined as the unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation for the purpose of encouraging the recipient of the telephone call to purchase property, goods, or services. Generally, under current law, a telephone solicitor may not make a telephone solicitation to a residential customer if the customer's telephone number is included in a directory, maintained by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP), listing residential customers who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations. Violations of current provisions regulating telephone solicitation are subject to a forfeiture of $100.

This bill increases the penalty for a violation to a forfeiture of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000. The bill also permits a person who suffers damages as a result of a violation to bring an action for injunctive relief and for actual damages or $500 per violation, whichever is greater.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. All 5 are Democrats.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Small Business vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Aug 14, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 2 · Mar 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 7, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 2 · Mar 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 7, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 23, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  3. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  5. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 2.

  7. Nov 4, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Sep 16, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  9. Sep 16, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Sep 15, 2009

    The Senate passed it.

  11. Sep 4, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  12. Aug 14, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  13. Aug 14, 2009

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection” (the official wording)

  14. Jul 22, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jun 18, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. May 26, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection.

  17. May 26, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 26, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Taylor, Coggs, Hansen and Vinehout;Cosponsored by Representatives Roys, Schneider, Berceau, Black, A. Ott, Jorgensen, Pope-Roberts, Zepnick, Gunderson and Hintz

  2. May 26, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection

  3. Jun 18, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 22, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Aug 13, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Aug 14, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection

  7. Aug 14, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Aug 14, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Sep 4, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  10. Sep 8, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 9-15-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  11. Sep 15, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Sep 15, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Sep 15, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Sep 15, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Sep 15, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  18. Nov 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  19. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roys

  20. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  21. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  22. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  23. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  24. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:21 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  25. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  26. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  27. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  29. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  30. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  32. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote