Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
reckless homicide of a child by a parent or caregiver and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if an individual is convicted of a crime, the court has
discretion in determining the length of any sentence that it imposes and, if the person
is sentenced to prison, how much of the sentence is to be served in prison (the term
of confinement) and how much is to be served in the community (the term of extended
supervision). The court's discretion, however, is limited by statutes that set
maximum penalties for crimes. For instance, for the crime of first-degree reckless
homicide, the maximum term of confinement is either 40 years, for causing a death
under circumstances that show utter disregard for human life, or 25 years, for
causing a death by manufacturing, distributing, delivering, or administering a
controlled substance and, for the crime of second-degree reckless homicide, the
maximum term of confinement is 15 years.
Under this bill, an individual who is convicted of first-degree or second-degree
reckless homicide is subject to a penalty enhancer if the victim of the reckless
homicide is a child who is not older than five years of age and the convicted individual
is a parent or caregiver of that child. The penalty enhancer varies based on the age
of the victim: if the victim is under the age of one year, the maximum term of
confinement is increased by 20 years; if the victim is at least one year old but younger
than three years old, the maximum term of confinement is increased by ten years;
and if the victim is at least three years old but not older than five years old, the
maximum term of confinement is increased by five years.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Erpenbach (D) , Lori Farrell of Waunakee , by request of Mike , death of their grandson Aaron Michael , in honor , remembrance of the life
Full history
- Jan 30, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Erpenbach, by request of Mike and Lori Farrell of Waunakee, in honor and remembrance of the life and death of their grandson Aaron Michael
- Jan 30, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Feb 11, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 12, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 13, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 14, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1