Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 222

Group deer hunting requirements and restrictions on placing, possessing, or transporting a firearm, bow, or crossbow in or on a vehicle

Topics: Firearms and dangerous weapons, Game: Hunting, Motor vehicle

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Feb 23, 2010, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 26, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill changes to the current law regulating hunting by persons in a group.

Current law provides that, if two or more persons are hunting in a group and each of those persons holds a deer hunting license and is hunting with a firearm, then one of the members of the group deer hunting party may kill a deer for another member of the group deer hunting party under certain circumstances. Those circumstances require that the person for whom the deer is killed must possess a current unused deer carcass tag authorized for use on that deer and also require that the person who kills the deer must be in contact with the person for whom the deer is killed. This bill eliminates the requirement that the member of the group deer hunting party who kills the deer must be in contact with the person for whom the deer is killed.

Read the full summary

This bill also extends certain hunting privileges to persons who hunt in a group and who all use a bow and arrow. The bill provides that a member of such a group may kill a deer for another member of the group if that deer is an antlerless deer and if the person for whom the antlerless deer is killed possesses a current unused deer carcass tag authorized for use on that deer.

Current law also requires a person who kills a deer for another member of a qualifying group deer hunting party to ensure that a member of the group deer hunting party attaches a current deer carcass tag to the deer without delay. This bill requires a person who kills a deer for another member of any qualifying group deer hunting party to inform another member of his or her group deer hunting party of the kill and to ensure that the informed member attaches his or her deer carcass tag to the deer within one hour after the deer is killed.

This bill also expands the exceptions to general restrictions on possessing or transporting a firearm, bow, or crossbow in or on a vehicle. Under current law, with certain exceptions, no person may place, possess, or transport (place) a firearm, bow, or crossbow in or on a vehicle unless: 1) for a firearm, the firearm is unloaded and completely enclosed in a case that is made for the purpose of containing a firearm;

or 2) for a bow or crossbow, the bow or crossbow is either unstrung or enclosed in a carrying case. This bill eliminates the requirement that an unloaded firearm placed in a vehicle be in a case. The bill also provides that the prohibitions against the placement of a firearm, bow, or crossbow in a vehicle do not apply if the vehicle is stationary. The bill does not change the current law prohibition against shooting a firearm, bolt, or arrow from a vehicle.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (6)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 12, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 53 to 45 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Fish and Wildlife and take up, Ayes 53, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 31, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Mar 11, 2010

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  4. Feb 24, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Fish and Wildlife.

  5. Feb 24, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  6. Feb 23, 2010

    The Senate passed it.

  7. Feb 23, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Feb 12, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  9. Feb 12, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  10. Feb 4, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. May 28, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. May 27, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  13. May 26, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  14. May 26, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 26, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Decker, Holperin, Hansen, Hopper and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Jorgensen, Petrowski, Spanbauer and Zigmunt

  2. May 26, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. May 27, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Grothman added as a coauthor

  4. May 28, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 3, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Decker

  6. Feb 4, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Decker

  8. Feb 11, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Feb 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  11. Feb 12, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted

  15. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Fish and Wildlife

  21. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Suder added as a cosponsor

  22. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  23. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Fish and Wildlife and take up, Ayes 53, Noes 45

  24. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote