Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 248

Penalty enhancers for committing domestic abuse in the presence of a child and providing penalties

Topics: Children: Abuse and neglect, Crime and criminals, Family, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Women

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jul 30, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person who commits a crime under specified circumstances may be subject to penalty enhancers, or penalties that are more severe than those that ordinarily apply to the crime. This bill creates a penalty enhancer for a person who commits an act of domestic abuse, as defined in current law, that is a crime while in the presence of a child. Under this bill, if the crime is a Class B misdemeanor, the maximum sentence may be increased by not more than nine months, if the crime is a Class A misdemeanor, the maximum sentence may be increased by not more than 13 months, if the crime is a Class I felony, the maximum sentence may be increased by not more than three years, and if the crime is a Class A to H felony, the maximum sentence may be increased by not more than five years.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. 3 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 14 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 13, 2010

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  3. Aug 17, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Aug 11, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Jul 30, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  6. Jul 30, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jul 30, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Hansen, Darling and A. Lasee;Cosponsored by Representatives Murtha, Ripp, Hraychuck, Gunderson, Kaufert, A. Ott, Spanbauer, Strachota, Suder and Townsend

  2. Jul 30, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Aug 11, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 11, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Aug 17, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes

  7. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate