Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 252

The duty to stop at the scene of, and to report, a motor vehicle accident

Topics: Motor vehicle: Accident, Motor vehicle: Parking, Motor vehicle: Regulation, Road

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 12, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 5, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 32 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 29, 2009

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 62

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 17, 2009: “Published 11-25-2009.”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if an operator of a vehicle has an accident resulting in personal injury or vehicle damage, the operator must immediately stop the vehicle at or near the scene of the accident, provide certain information, and render reasonable assistance to any injured person. If an operator of a vehicle has an accident with an unattended vehicle or with property on or adjacent to a highway, the operator must immediately stop and fulfill certain obligations to provide notice of the vehicle operator's identity. The operator of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury or death to a person or damage to property in specified amounts must report the accident to law enforcement as soon as possible. These requirements are applicable not only on highways but also on premises, whether publicly or privately owned, that are held out for public vehicle use, provided by employers to employees for vehicle use, or provided to tenants of certain rental housing for vehicle use. However, these requirements do not apply to private parking areas at farms or single-family residences or to accidents involving only snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, or nonmotorized vehicles. A person who commits a failure-to-stop violation or who fails to report an accident for which a report is required is subject to varying penalties, and the owner of a vehicle involved in a failure-to-stop violation may also be subject to penalty as well.

This bill specifies that these failure-to-stop requirements apply to the operator of a vehicle that, whether by operator intention or lack of control, departs a highway or any premises described above immediately prior to an accident if the accident does not occur on real property owned or leased by the operator. The bill also specifies that the accident reporting requirement and owner liability apply with respect to such an accident.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

25 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 33 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (25)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Oct 20, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 17, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 12, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 62.

  3. Nov 10, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Oct 29, 2009

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Oct 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Oct 22, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Oct 20, 2009

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.

  8. Oct 5, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  9. Sep 17, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Sep 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Aug 5, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  12. Aug 5, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 5, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Carpenter, Risser, Kedzie, Darling, Grothman, A. Lasee and Lassa;Cosponsored by Representatives Davis, Staskunas, Ballweg, Berceau, Brooks, Kerkman, Knodl, LeMahieu, Lothian, Murtha, Nerison, A. Ott, Pasch, Petersen, Pocan, Ripp, Smith, Spanbauer, Strachota, Townsend, Vos, Gunderson, A. Williams, Kaufert and Suder

  2. Aug 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Sep 3, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 5, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Oct 5, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Oct 13, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-20-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  9. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  13. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Oct 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  16. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules

  17. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  21. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  23. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-3-2009

  24. Nov 10, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2009

  25. Nov 12, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-12-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 62

  26. Nov 17, 2009 · Senate

    Published 11-25-2009.

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote