Senate Bill 263
Criteria for determining indigency for purposes of representation by the State Public Defender and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority
Topics: Public defender, Public employee
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 16, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Aug 11, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 28, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 4, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 164
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 19, 2010: “Published 3-29-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the State Public Defender (SPD) provides counsel to represent people in various legal proceedings, including criminal proceedings that may result in imprisonment, and proceedings concerning emergency detention, involuntary civil commitment, protective placement, paternity determination, and juvenile delinquency. The SPD provides counsel to children and juveniles in protective services and delinquency proceedings regardless of the child's or juvenile's income or assets. The SPD provides counsel to adults in proceedings concerning involuntary commitment for mental health or alcoholism treatment, protective placement or services, or involuntary administration of psychotropic medication regardless of the adult's income or assets. In other types of proceedings, the SPD may provide counsel only to people who are indigent.
Current law provides that a person is indigent for purposes of SPD representation if the person's income and assets, after deduction for reasonable and necessary living expenses, are insufficient to cover the cost of effective legal representation. Current law equates reasonable and necessary living expenses with benefit amounts under the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. However, in determining whether a person can afford counsel, courts are not limited by the SPD indigency criteria. If a person is the subject of a legal proceeding for which he or she has the right to appointed counsel if he or she cannot afford counsel, and the person offers proof that he or she cannot afford counsel, the court must independently review the person's circumstances. If the court finds that the person cannot afford counsel and does not meet the criteria for SPD appointment, the court must appoint counsel and the county in which the court sits must pay the appointed counsel.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill changes the criteria for determining indigency for the purpose of SPD representation. Under the bill, the SPD must adopt rules regarding indigency determinations that require the SPD, when assessing a person's eligibility, to consider the anticipated costs of effective representation for the type of case in which the person is involved. The rules must also require that assets and income be treated as available to the person to pay the costs of legal representation if they exceed the asset and income ceilings for eligibility for the Wisconsin Works (W-2) program, except that the asset exclusion for a person's home is limited to $30,000. (To be eligible for the W-2 program, a person's household assets, after excluding up to $10,000 for a vehicle and the value of the person's home, cannot exceed $2,500, and his or her household income cannot exceed 115 percent of the federal poverty line.)
Additionally, under the rules, the SPD must treat assets or income of the person's spouse as the person's assets or income, unless the spouse was the victim of a crime the person allegedly committed. The bill provides the Public Defender Board authority for 49.25 new full-time equivalent general purpose revenue positions.
Who's behind it
15 senators are its . 13 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.
32 more lawmakers .
See all 47 names Hide the names
Authors (15)
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (32)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Annette Williams · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Pedro Colon · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristen Dexter · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Joe Parisi · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Donna Seidel · Democrat, Assembly
- Sherman
- Shilling
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- James Soletski · Democrat, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Terry Van Akkeren · Democrat, Assembly
- Karl Van Roy · Republican, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 14 to 0 · Jan 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 13 to 1 · Jan 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 21 to 12 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 19, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Mar 16, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 164.
-
Mar 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 4, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 4, 2010
“Point of order that Assembly amendment 1 not germane well taken” (the official wording)
-
Feb 1, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 1, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jan 15, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 1.
-
Jan 15, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 15, 2010
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)
-
Jan 15, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Nov 4, 2009
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
Oct 6, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 3, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 11, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Aug 11, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Aug 11, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Coggs, Risser, Sullivan, Miller, Olsen, Vinehout, Wirch, Robson, Lassa, Erpenbach, Lehman, Plale, Hansen, Taylor and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Sherman, Hebl, Grigsby, Hintz, Bies, Berceau, Colon, Dexter, Fields, Jorgensen, Kessler, Mason, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Parisi, Pasch, Petrowski, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Tauchen, Turner, Van Akkeren, Van Roy, A. Williams and Young
- Aug 11, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Sep 3, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 6, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Jan 14, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Radcliffe, Ziegelbauer, Van Roy, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink and Hraychuck
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly amendment 1 not germane well taken
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 9, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-9-2010
- Mar 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 164
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Published 3-29-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote