Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 263

Criteria for determining indigency for purposes of representation by the State Public Defender and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority

Topics: Public defender, Public employee

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 16, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 11, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 28, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 4, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 164

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 19, 2010: “Published 3-29-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the State Public Defender (SPD) provides counsel to represent people in various legal proceedings, including criminal proceedings that may result in imprisonment, and proceedings concerning emergency detention, involuntary civil commitment, protective placement, paternity determination, and juvenile delinquency. The SPD provides counsel to children and juveniles in protective services and delinquency proceedings regardless of the child's or juvenile's income or assets. The SPD provides counsel to adults in proceedings concerning involuntary commitment for mental health or alcoholism treatment, protective placement or services, or involuntary administration of psychotropic medication regardless of the adult's income or assets. In other types of proceedings, the SPD may provide counsel only to people who are indigent.

Current law provides that a person is indigent for purposes of SPD representation if the person's income and assets, after deduction for reasonable and necessary living expenses, are insufficient to cover the cost of effective legal representation. Current law equates reasonable and necessary living expenses with benefit amounts under the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. However, in determining whether a person can afford counsel, courts are not limited by the SPD indigency criteria. If a person is the subject of a legal proceeding for which he or she has the right to appointed counsel if he or she cannot afford counsel, and the person offers proof that he or she cannot afford counsel, the court must independently review the person's circumstances. If the court finds that the person cannot afford counsel and does not meet the criteria for SPD appointment, the court must appoint counsel and the county in which the court sits must pay the appointed counsel.

Read the full summary

This bill changes the criteria for determining indigency for the purpose of SPD representation. Under the bill, the SPD must adopt rules regarding indigency determinations that require the SPD, when assessing a person's eligibility, to consider the anticipated costs of effective representation for the type of case in which the person is involved. The rules must also require that assets and income be treated as available to the person to pay the costs of legal representation if they exceed the asset and income ceilings for eligibility for the Wisconsin Works (W-2) program, except that the asset exclusion for a person's home is limited to $30,000. (To be eligible for the W-2 program, a person's household assets, after excluding up to $10,000 for a vehicle and the value of the person's home, cannot exceed $2,500, and his or her household income cannot exceed 115 percent of the federal poverty line.)

Additionally, under the rules, the SPD must treat assets or income of the person's spouse as the person's assets or income, unless the spouse was the victim of a crime the person allegedly committed. The bill provides the Public Defender Board authority for 49.25 new full-time equivalent general purpose revenue positions.

Who's behind it

15 senators are its ⁠. 13 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

32 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 47 names

Authors (15)

Signed on in support (32)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 14 to 0 · Jan 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 1 · Jan 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 21 to 12 · Jan 28, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 19, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 16, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 164.

  3. Mar 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 4, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Mar 4, 2010

    “Point of order that Assembly amendment 1 not germane well taken” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 1, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 1, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Jan 28, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.

  9. Jan 28, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Jan 15, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 1.

  11. Jan 15, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Jan 15, 2010

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)

  13. Jan 15, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  14. Nov 4, 2009

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  15. Oct 29, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  16. Oct 6, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Sep 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Aug 11, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  19. Aug 11, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 11, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Coggs, Risser, Sullivan, Miller, Olsen, Vinehout, Wirch, Robson, Lassa, Erpenbach, Lehman, Plale, Hansen, Taylor and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Sherman, Hebl, Grigsby, Hintz, Bies, Berceau, Colon, Dexter, Fields, Jorgensen, Kessler, Mason, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Parisi, Pasch, Petrowski, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Tauchen, Turner, Van Akkeren, Van Roy, A. Williams and Young

  2. Aug 11, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Sep 3, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 6, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  7. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  8. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  10. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  11. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  12. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  13. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  14. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  15. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  17. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  18. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  19. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  20. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  23. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  25. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  26. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Radcliffe, Ziegelbauer, Van Roy, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink and Hraychuck

  27. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  28. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  29. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly amendment 1 not germane well taken

  30. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  35. Mar 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-9-2010

  36. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  37. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 164

  38. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote