Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
criteria for determining indigency for purposes of representation by the State Public Defender and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the State Public Defender (SPD) provides counsel to
represent people in various legal proceedings, including criminal proceedings that
may result in imprisonment, and proceedings concerning emergency detention,
involuntary civil commitment, protective placement, paternity determination, and
juvenile delinquency. The SPD provides counsel to children and juveniles in
protective services and delinquency proceedings regardless of the child's or juvenile's
income or assets. The SPD provides counsel to adults in proceedings concerning
involuntary commitment for mental health or alcoholism treatment, protective
placement or services, or involuntary administration of psychotropic medication
regardless of the adult's income or assets. In other types of proceedings, the SPD may
provide counsel only to people who are indigent.
Current law provides that a person is indigent for purposes of SPD
representation if the person's income and assets, after deduction for reasonable and
necessary living expenses, are insufficient to cover the cost of effective legal
representation. Current law equates reasonable and necessary living expenses with
benefit amounts under the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children
program. However, in determining whether a person can afford counsel, courts are
not limited by the SPD indigency criteria. If a person is the subject of a legal
proceeding for which he or she has the right to appointed counsel if he or she cannot
afford counsel, and the person offers proof that he or she cannot afford counsel, the
court must independently review the person's circumstances. If the court finds that
the person cannot afford counsel and does not meet the criteria for SPD appointment,
the court must appoint counsel and the county in which the court sits must pay the
appointed counsel.
This bill changes the criteria for determining indigency for the purpose of SPD
representation. Under the bill, the SPD must adopt rules regarding indigency
determinations that require the SPD, when assessing a person's eligibility, to
consider the anticipated costs of effective representation for the type of case in which
the person is involved. The rules must also require that assets and income be treated
as available to the person to pay the costs of legal representation if they exceed the
asset and income ceilings for eligibility for the Wisconsin Works (W-2) program,
except that the asset exclusion for a person's home is limited to $30,000. (To be
eligible for the W-2 program, a person's household assets, after excluding up to
$10,000 for a vehicle and the value of the person's home, cannot exceed $2,500, and
his or her household income cannot exceed 115 percent of the federal poverty line.)
Additionally, under the rules, the SPD must treat assets or income of the person's
spouse as the person's assets or income, unless the spouse was the victim of a crime
the person allegedly committed. The bill provides the Public Defender Board
authority for 49.25 new full-time equivalent general purpose revenue positions.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Coggs (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Lassa (D) , Lehman (D) , Miller (D) , Olsen (R) , Plale (D) , Risser (D) , Robson (D) , Schultz (R) , Sullivan (D) , Taylor (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)
32 cosponsors
A. Ott (R) , A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Bies (R) , Colon (D) , Dexter (D) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Parisi (D) , Pasch (D) , Petrowski (R) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Roys (D) , Seidel (D) , Sherman , Shilling , Smith (D) , Soletski (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Tauchen (R) , Turner (D) , Van Akkeren (D) , Van Roy (R) , Young (D)
Votes
Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
Passed 5–0 Oct 29, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0
Passed 14–0 Jan 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1
Passed 13–1 Jan 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12
Passed 21–12 Jan 28, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 11, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Coggs, Risser, Sullivan, Miller, Olsen, Vinehout, Wirch, Robson, Lassa, Erpenbach, Lehman, Plale, Hansen, Taylor and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Sherman, Hebl, Grigsby, Hintz, Bies, Berceau, Colon, Dexter, Fields, Jorgensen, Kessler, Mason, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Parisi, Pasch, Petrowski, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Tauchen, Turner, Van Akkeren, Van Roy, A. Williams and Young
- Aug 11, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Sep 3, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 6, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Jan 14, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Radcliffe, Ziegelbauer, Van Roy, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink and Hraychuck
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly amendment 1 not germane well taken
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 9, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-9-2010
- Mar 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 164
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Published 3-29-2010