Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 263

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

criteria for determining indigency for purposes of representation by the State Public Defender and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the State Public Defender (SPD) provides counsel to

represent people in various legal proceedings, including criminal proceedings that

may result in imprisonment, and proceedings concerning emergency detention,

involuntary civil commitment, protective placement, paternity determination, and

juvenile delinquency. The SPD provides counsel to children and juveniles in

protective services and delinquency proceedings regardless of the child's or juvenile's

income or assets. The SPD provides counsel to adults in proceedings concerning

involuntary commitment for mental health or alcoholism treatment, protective

placement or services, or involuntary administration of psychotropic medication

regardless of the adult's income or assets. In other types of proceedings, the SPD may

provide counsel only to people who are indigent.

Current law provides that a person is indigent for purposes of SPD

representation if the person's income and assets, after deduction for reasonable and

necessary living expenses, are insufficient to cover the cost of effective legal

representation. Current law equates reasonable and necessary living expenses with

benefit amounts under the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children

program. However, in determining whether a person can afford counsel, courts are

not limited by the SPD indigency criteria. If a person is the subject of a legal

proceeding for which he or she has the right to appointed counsel if he or she cannot

afford counsel, and the person offers proof that he or she cannot afford counsel, the

court must independently review the person's circumstances. If the court finds that

the person cannot afford counsel and does not meet the criteria for SPD appointment,

the court must appoint counsel and the county in which the court sits must pay the

appointed counsel.

This bill changes the criteria for determining indigency for the purpose of SPD

representation. Under the bill, the SPD must adopt rules regarding indigency

determinations that require the SPD, when assessing a person's eligibility, to

consider the anticipated costs of effective representation for the type of case in which

the person is involved. The rules must also require that assets and income be treated

as available to the person to pay the costs of legal representation if they exceed the

asset and income ceilings for eligibility for the Wisconsin Works (W-2) program,

except that the asset exclusion for a person's home is limited to $30,000. (To be

eligible for the W-2 program, a person's household assets, after excluding up to

$10,000 for a vehicle and the value of the person's home, cannot exceed $2,500, and

his or her household income cannot exceed 115 percent of the federal poverty line.)

Additionally, under the rules, the SPD must treat assets or income of the person's

spouse as the person's assets or income, unless the spouse was the victim of a crime

the person allegedly committed. The bill provides the Public Defender Board

authority for 49.25 new full-time equivalent general purpose revenue positions.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Coggs (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Lassa (D) , Lehman (D) , Miller (D) , Olsen (R) , Plale (D) , Risser (D) , Robson (D) , Schultz (R) , Sullivan (D) , Taylor (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)

32 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Bies (R) , Colon (D) , Dexter (D) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Parisi (D) , Pasch (D) , Petrowski (R) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Roys (D) , Seidel (D) , Sherman , Shilling , Smith (D) , Soletski (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Tauchen (R) , Turner (D) , Van Akkeren (D) , Van Roy (R) , Young (D)

Votes

Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

Passed 5–0 Oct 29, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0

Passed 14–0 Jan 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1

Passed 13–1 Jan 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

Passed 21–12 Jan 28, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 11, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Coggs, Risser, Sullivan, Miller, Olsen, Vinehout, Wirch, Robson, Lassa, Erpenbach, Lehman, Plale, Hansen, Taylor and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Sherman, Hebl, Grigsby, Hintz, Bies, Berceau, Colon, Dexter, Fields, Jorgensen, Kessler, Mason, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Parisi, Pasch, Petrowski, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Tauchen, Turner, Van Akkeren, Van Roy, A. Williams and Young

  2. Aug 11, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Sep 3, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 6, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  7. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  8. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  10. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  11. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  12. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  13. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  14. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  15. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  17. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  18. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  19. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  20. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  23. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  25. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  26. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Radcliffe, Ziegelbauer, Van Roy, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink and Hraychuck

  27. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  28. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  29. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly amendment 1 not germane well taken

  30. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  35. Mar 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-9-2010

  36. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  37. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 164

  38. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2010