Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 274

Requiring landlords to change locks

Topics: Children: Abuse and neglect, Court: Procedure, Landlord and tenant, Women

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 26, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a tenant may terminate his or her tenancy and remove from the premises if the tenant or a child of the tenant faces an imminent threat of serious physical harm from another person if the tenant remains on the premises. The tenant must provide notice to the landlord and a certified copy of: 1) an injunction order protecting the tenant or the child from the person; 2) a condition of release ordering the person not to contact the tenant; 3) a criminal complaint alleging that the person sexually assaulted or stalked the tenant or the child; or 4) a criminal complaint filed against the person as a result of an arrest for committing a domestic abuse offense against the tenant.

This bill requires a landlord to change the locks to a tenant's premises, or to give a tenant permission to do so, regardless of whether the tenant is terminating his or her tenancy, if the tenant requests it and provides the landlord with a certified copy of one of the documents that the tenant must provide under current law to terminate his or her tenancy because the tenant faces an imminent threat of serious physical harm from another person if the tenant remains on the premises. The landlord must change the locks, or give the tenant permission to do so, within 48 hours after receiving the request and certified copy of the document. The tenant is responsible for the cost of having the locks changed.

Read the full summary

The bill provides an exception from the requirement to change the locks. If the person who is the subject of the document that the tenant provides a certified copy of to the landlord is also a tenant of the premises for which the locks are to be changed, the landlord is not required to change the locks unless the document is: 1) an injunction directing that other tenant to avoid the residence of the tenant requesting that the locks be changed; or 2) a condition of release ordering that other tenant not to contact the tenant requesting that the locks be changed.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

19 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (19)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 29, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  3. Oct 29, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  4. Oct 29, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  5. Oct 7, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Sep 24, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  7. Aug 26, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  8. Aug 26, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 26, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Holperin, Hansen, Kreitlow, Schultz and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Dexter, Parisi, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Clark, Grigsby, Hebl, Milroy, A. Ott, Pasch, Pocan, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Smith, Suder, A. Williams and Wood

  2. Aug 26, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Sep 24, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  4. Oct 1, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Holperin

  5. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 13, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Holperin

  7. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  13. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Laid on the table

  15. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote