Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
changes in the regulation of boxing contests, regulating mixed martial arts fighting contests, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Regulation and Licensing (department)
regulates boxing contests conducted in the state. No club may conduct a professional
boxing contest without a license from the department. Currently, only clubs that are
incorporated under the laws of this state and whose members have been residents
of this state for at least one year are eligible for licensure. An applicant for licensure
must pay an annual fee from $25 to $300, depending on the size of the city, village,
or town in which the contest is held and the price of admission.
Current law also authorizes the department to license matchmakers,
managers, referees, examining physicians, and boxers in professional boxing
contests. A department-appointed inspector must be present at all professional
boxing contests to see that the rules are strictly observed. A licensee authorized to
conduct a professional boxing contest must insure each contestant for hospital,
nursing, and medication expenses and physician's services according to an equitable
fee schedule. The department is required to ban a contestant who participates in a
sham or fake professional boxing contest or violates any department rule, and is
authorized to require the contestant to forfeit the purse for the contest.
Also under current law, an amateur boxing contest (defined as a contest in
which none of the contestants are compensated for participating) may be conducted
in this state only if the contest is sanctioned by, and conducted under the rules of, the
national governing body for amateur boxing.
This bill generally authorizes the department to regulate amateur and
professional mixed martial arts fighting contests on the same terms as professional
boxing contests, and to license promoters of boxing and mixed martial arts fighting
contests on the same terms as clubs. The bill deletes the requirements that
applicants for licensure be incorporated under the laws of this state and comprise
only members who are residents of this state. The bill changes the license
application fee to $200, or $500 in a city of more than 150,000 inhabitants, and
changes the penalty for sham or fake contests to a forfeiture not to exceed $500. Fifty
percent of forfeitures collected by the department are appropriated to the
department for enforcement.
The bill also imposes a number of requirements on mixed martial arts fighting
contests, including the following: A contestant in an amateur mixed martial arts
fighting contest must be able to provide evidence that he or she is covered by
adequate health insurance. No mixed martial arts fighting contest may be conducted
without at least one licensed referee and at least four licensed judges. Contestants
must be examined by a physician immediately before and after each match, and a
physician and ambulance must be present during each match. The bill requires the
department to promulgate rules for mixed martial arts fighting contests
establishing: 1) qualifications for licensure of referees and judges; 2) requirements
for regular health examinations for contestants; and 3) policies prohibiting the use
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 3 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 29, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
Passed 32–0 Nov 5, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Jan 12, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Assembly substitute amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 1
Passed 32–1 Jan 21, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 16, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Hansen, Lehman, Plale, Cowles, Lassa, Taylor and Sullivan;Cosponsored by Representatives Colon, Pocan, Zepnick, Hintz, Zigmunt, Kleefisch, Vruwink, Richards, Cullen, Staskunas, Honadel and Seidel
- Sep 16, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Oct 1, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 13, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 13, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 27, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Hansen
- Oct 28, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Hansen
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 3 offered by Senator Hansen
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 3 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 3 adopted
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection
- Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Colon
- Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 13, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Rules
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 20, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-21-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Assembly substitute amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 1
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 1-26-2010
- Feb 2, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 2-2-2010
- Feb 5, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 2-4-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 111
- Feb 9, 2010 · Senate
Published 2-18-2010.