Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
authorizing the designation of a tax incremental district as distressed and expanding the use of donor tax incremental districts.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns also have a limited ability to create a TID under
certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and
plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed
TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning
commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project
plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city
or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR
authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,
20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID
and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID
and the allocation period may be extended.
Under certain limited circumstances, a TID that has paid off all of its project
costs but has not reached its mandatory termination date may become a donor TID,
continue to receive tax increments, and forward those increments to a recipient TID
created by the same city or village.
Under current law, a planning commission may adopt an amendment to a
project plan, which requires the approval of the common council or village board and
the same findings that current law requires for the creation of a TID. Current law
also authorizes the amendment of a project plan up to four times during a TID's
existence to change the district's boundaries by adding or subtracting territory.
This bill authorizes a city or village to designate a TID that was created before
October 1, 2008, as a distressed TID if a number of steps occur. The city or village
must adopt a resolution finding that its project costs incurred on the TID exceed the
revenues the city or village expects the TID to generate during its lifetime. If DOR
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 26, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
Passed 32–0 Mar 4, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 97, Noes 1
Passed 97–1 Apr 13, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 98, Noes 0
Passed 98–0 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
Passed 33–0 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 16, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Sullivan, Schultz, Holperin, Kreitlow and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Molepske Jr., Ripp, Radcliffe, Davis, Staskunas, Brooks, Townsend, Soletski, Clark, Zepnick, Hintz and Petersen
- Sep 16, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development
- Sep 21, 2009 · Senate
Representative Petersen added as a cosponsor
- Oct 12, 2009 · Senate
Representative Hixson added as a cosponsor
- Oct 19, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 20, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Sullivan
- Oct 22, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senators Vinehout, Sullivan and Decker
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 97, Noes 1
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Recalled from enrolling pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 75
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Decker
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 98, Noes 0
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 3, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-3-2010
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 310
- May 14, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-26-2010