Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 296

Extensions of managed forest land orders

Topics: Forestry, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 16, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers the managed forest land program that exempts a landowner from payment of municipal property taxes on land in the program in exchange for the landowner's payment of an acreage share, which is lower than the municipal property tax, and for the landowner's compliance with approved forestry and other conservation practices. The duration of a managed forest land order may be either 25 or 50 years.

This bill allows the owner of managed forest land to apply to DNR for an extension of a managed forest land order by an additional ten years from the date of the expiration of the original order under certain circumstances. An owner may apply for an extension of the order if 30 percent or more of the merchantable timber on five or more contiguous acres of the managed forest land was adversely affected by fire, ice, snow, insects, disease, wind, or flooding. The bill requires that the cause of the adverse effect on the managed forest land must have occurred within 15 years before the date of the expiration of the original order and must have resulted in a reduction of 30 percent or more in stumpage value to the owner. "Stumpage value" is the value of timber before it is cut as established in rules promulgated by DNR.

Read the full summary

The application must be signed by the owner of the managed forest land and the owner's eligibility for the extension must be certified by a DNR field forester. The bill provides that, if the owner meets the requirements for the extension, DNR may deny the application only if the owner has failed to comply with the management plan for the managed forest land or if there are delinquent taxes on the land.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 14, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 19, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  3. Jan 14, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  4. Jan 14, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  5. Nov 9, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Sep 30, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Sep 16, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  8. Sep 16, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 16, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lassa, Holperin, Schultz, Taylor and Lehman;Cosponsored by Representatives Schneider, Brooks, Nerison and Ripp

  2. Sep 16, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Lassa

  6. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  8. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  9. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  11. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote