Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 297

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the immobilization or removal, impoundment, and disposal of motor vehicles for multiple nonmoving traffic violations.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, an authority that issues citations (tickets) for nonmoving

traffic (parking) violations may enforce parking violations in several ways. A person

issued a parking ticket may pay the ticket by mail as the parking ticket provides and,

if the person does so, the parking ticket is not filed with or transmitted to court. The

person may also appear in court to contest the parking ticket. If the person does not

pay the parking ticket or make a timely appearance in court, the authority that

issued the ticket may issue a summons to the person and follow a procedure to

request that the Department of Transportation (DOT) suspend the person's vehicle

registration or, in lieu of this procedure, follow a procedure for the issuance of a

warrant for the person and for the person's arrest or deposit of money or a driver's

license to secure the person's appearance in court.

Also under current law, any city, village, or town (municipality) or any county

may enact an ordinance prohibiting unregistered motor vehicles on highways and

providing for the immobilization, removal (towing), impoundment, and disposal of

these vehicles.

This bill creates an alternative method for the enforcement of multiple parking

violations. The bill allows a municipality or county to enact an ordinance providing

for the immobilization with an immobilization device (typically a "car boot") or

towing, impoundment, and disposal of vehicles owned by habitual parking violators.

The ordinance must be limited to those vehicles for which all of the following apply:

1. The municipality or county has issued tickets to the owner of the motor

vehicle for three or more parking violations that, at the time of the vehicle's

immobilization or towing, occurred more than 28 days previously and for which the

owner has neither paid each ticket nor scheduled an appearance in court in response

to each unpaid ticket.

2. The municipality or county has mailed to the last-known address of the

owner at least one notice that provides, for each parking ticket, certain information,

including the manner in which each parking ticket may be paid or contested. The

notice must also inform the owner that the owner's vehicles may be immobilized or

towed and impounded if, within 28 days after the owner has received three or more

citations and at the time the vehicle is immobilized or towed, the owner has not either

paid the ticket for each violation that occurred more than 28 days previously or

scheduled an appearance in court in response to each unpaid ticket issued more than

28 days previously. The notice may be combined with any other notice provided by

the municipality or county to the vehicle owner.

The ordinance authorizes any parking enforcer to have a vehicle to which the

ordinance applies immobilized on, or towed and impounded from, or both, any

portion of a street, highway, or publicly owned or leased parking facility, regardless

of whether the vehicle is legally or illegally parked. Upon immobilization or towing

of the vehicle, the parking enforcer must follow certain procedures for notification

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Darling (R)

12 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Gottlieb (R) , Knodl (R) , Krusick (D) , Mursau (R) , Richards (D) , Staskunas (D) , Stone (R) , Townsend (R) , Turner (D) , Vos (R) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

Passed 6–1 Jan 14, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 16, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Carpenter and Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives Krusick, Gottlieb, Richards, Staskunas, Zepnick, Mursau, A. Ott, Stone, Townsend, Vos and Knodl

  2. Sep 16, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Sep 16, 2009 · Senate

    Representative Turner added as a cosponsor

  4. Sep 24, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  8. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Apr 6, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter

  10. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Grothman

  14. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author

  15. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  21. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:28 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  22. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1