Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 300

Certain areas of land subject to managed forest land orders that were part of a parcel of land under single ownership that exceeded 8,000 acres in size

Topics: Forestry, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Oct 27, 2009, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 23, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Oct 27, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the Managed Forest Land (MFL) Program administered by the Department of Natural Resources, the owner of a parcel of land designated as MFL makes an annual acreage share payment that is lower than, and in lieu of, the property taxes that normally would be payable on the land. In exchange, the owner must comply with certain forestry practices. The owner may keep a specific area closed to public access and the remainder of the MFL must be kept open for recreational activities, such as hunting, fishing, and cross-country skiing. For MFL that is closed to the public, the MFL owner must make an additional payment.

Current law imposes size limits on the area that may be closed and one of these limits is a maximum of 160 acres in a single town, city, or village.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, an MFL owner may not close a specific area even if it is less than 160 acres in a single town, city, or village if the specific area of land was, on January 1, 2009, part of a parcel under single ownership that exceeded 8,000 acres in size.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. All 5 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 7 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 15, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 23 to 9 · Oct 27, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 23, Noes 9”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 18, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Oct 29, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Forestry.

  4. Oct 29, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  5. Oct 27, 2009

    The Senate passed it, 23 to 9.

  6. Oct 27, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  7. Oct 15, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  8. Oct 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Sep 30, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Sep 23, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  11. Sep 23, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Holperin, Decker, Lassa, Taylor and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Brooks and Nass

  2. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Oct 2, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  7. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  8. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Oct 22, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-27-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  10. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  12. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 23, Noes 9

  15. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Forestry

  18. Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  19. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote