Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
powersports vehicle manufacturers, distributors, and dealers and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill creates provisions governing the relationship between powersports
vehicle manufacturers and distributors, including their agents, officers, factory
representatives, and affiliates (collectively referred to as franchisors), and
powersports vehicle dealers (dealers). Under the bill, a powersports vehicle is an
all-terrain vehicle, snowmobile, lightweight utility vehicle, personal watercraft, or
off-road motorcycle. The bill imposes numerous restrictions on franchisors,
including prohibiting franchisors from doing any of the following:
1. Discriminating between dealers in certain ways, including: not offering the
same wholesale order programs to all powersports vehicle dealers; tying dealer
incentives for retail customers to placement of dealer orders; and providing for an
unfair, unreasonable, or inequitable method for the allocation, scheduling, or
delivery of new powersports vehicles, parts, or accessories to dealers.
2. Making secret payments or providing other secret compensation to dealers
if certain consequences result.
3. Giving preferential treatment to some powersports vehicle dealers over
others in the delivery of new powersports vehicles, parts, or accessories.
4. Competing with a dealer by, for more than one year, acting as a dealer or
owning, operating, or controlling a dealership in this state.
5. Taking certain actions related to the capital structure, financing, or location
of dealerships.
6. Failing to hold harmless and indemnify dealers in certain circumstances.
7. Preventing a dealer from receiving reasonable compensation for a
powersports vehicle or from freely associating with other dealers.
8. Charging dealers increased prices without specified prior notice.
9. Reimbursing anyone other than an authorized dealer for warranty service.
10. Paying less than the amount of the franchisor's suggested retail price for
parts used by dealers to perform warranty work.
11. Paying dealers an amount for labor that is less than the amount dealers
charge their retail customers for labor.
12. Requiring or coercing dealers to grant rights of first refusal or other
preferences related to purchasing dealer franchises.
13. Requiring that arbitration or legal proceedings take place outside this
state.
The bill also specifies that a franchisor may, without violating the restrictions
identified above, offer by auction powersports vehicles to all dealers and provide
certain programs to dealers.
Under the bill, a franchisor may be required to forfeit not less than $100 nor
more than $1,000 for each violation of these restrictions. The Department of
Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) has jurisdiction to investigate
and enforce these restrictions, and DATCP, represented by the Department of
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1
Passed 6–1 Apr 5, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 25, Noes 8
Passed 25–8 Apr 13, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up, Ayes 21, Noes 73
Failed 21–73 Apr 22, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 23, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Hansen, Holperin, Taylor, Ellis, Cowles and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Vruwink, Kaufert, Ripp, Townsend, A. Ott, Zepnick and Kestell
- Sep 23, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
- Sep 30, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 8, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 8, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 9, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 31, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Hansen
- Apr 1, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 1, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 5, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Apr 5, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 5, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Hansen
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 25, Noes 8
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up, Ayes 21, Noes 73
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1