Senate Bill 31
The Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act, as approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
Topics: Fiduciaries, Uniform legislation
Became law
The governor signed it on Jul 20, 2009. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 3, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed May 13, 2009
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jun 18, 2009
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 33
Latest entry in the official record, Jul 23, 2009: “Published 8-3-2009.”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Currently, the management and investment of assets in funds held by institutions that are organized and operated exclusively for educational, religious, charitable, or other eleemosynary purposes, or a governmental organization to the extent that it holds funds exclusively for any of these purposes, is governed by the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA). This act, approved and recommended by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), was enacted into Wisconsin law in 1976.
This bill replaces UMIFA with the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA), as approved and recommended by NCCUSL in 2006. Significantly, UPMIFA updates the prudence standard established in UMIFA to govern the management and investment of the above-mentioned funds, providing that one of the enumerated prudence factors is the preservation of the funds, a factor not contained in UMIFA. UPMIFA applies to funds held by institutions exclusively for charitable purposes. A charitable purpose under UPMIFA specifically means the relief of poverty, the advancement of education or religion, the promotion of health, the promotion of a governmental purpose, or any other purpose, the achievement of which is beneficial to the community.
Read the full summary Show less
With respect to the management and investment of assets in these funds, UPMIFA requires those who manage and invest assets to do all of the following:
1. Consider the charitable purposes of the institution and the purposes of the institutional fund.
2. Manage and invest the fund in good faith and with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances.
3. Incur only costs that are appropriate and reasonable in relation to the assets, the purposes of the institution, and the skills available to the institution.
4. Make a reasonable effort to verify facts relevant to the management and investment of the fund.
5. Generally consider general economic conditions; the possible effect of inflation or deflation; the expected tax consequences, if any, of investment decisions or strategies; the role that each investment or course of action plays within the overall investment portfolio of the fund; the expected total return from income and the appreciation of investments; other resources of the institution; the needs of the institution and the fund to make distributions and to preserve capital; and an asset's special relationship or special value, if any, to the charitable purposes of the institution.
Further, with respect to endowment funds held by these institutions, UPMIFA authorizes an institution to appropriate for expenditure or accumulate so much of an endowment fund as the institution determines is prudent for the uses, benefits, purposes, and duration for which the endowment fund is established. In making a determination to appropriate or accumulate, an institution must act in good faith, with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances, and must consider, if relevant, the duration and preservation of the endowment fund; the purposes of the institution and the endowment fund; general economic conditions; the possible effect of inflation or deflation; the expected total return from income and the appreciation of investments;
other resources of the institution; and the investment policy of the institution.
Who's behind it
9 senators are its . 8 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.
14 more lawmakers .
See all 23 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (14)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Benedict · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- David Cullen · Democrat, Assembly
- Brett Davis · Republican, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Shilling
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Stone · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · May 11, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions vote to recommend it
Passed, 11 to 0 · Jun 16, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Jul 23, 2009
The new law was published.
-
Jul 20, 2009
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 33.
-
Jul 20, 2009
Sent to the governor.
-
Jun 18, 2009
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jun 16, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jun 16, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 0.
-
Jun 3, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 14, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.
-
May 14, 2009
The Assembly received it.
-
May 13, 2009
The Senate passed it.
-
May 13, 2009
The Senate adopted it.
-
May 11, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
May 11, 2009
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
May 11, 2009
“Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions” (the official wording)
-
Apr 1, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 3, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions.
-
Feb 3, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 3, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Risser, Lehman, Cowles, Plale, Lassa, Miller, Robson, Taylor and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Cullen, Fields, Stone, Davis, Smith, Zepnick, Turner, Berceau, A. Ott, Kaufert, Kestell, Benedict, Townsend and Shilling
- Feb 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions
- Apr 1, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- May 6, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- May 11, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions
- May 11, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- May 11, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- May 11, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- May 12, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-13-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- May 14, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- May 14, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions
- Jun 3, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jun 10, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-18-2009 by committee on Rules
- Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 18, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Jun 22, 2009 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 6-22-2009
- Jul 20, 2009 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 7-20-2009
- Jul 20, 2009 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 7-20-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 33
- Jul 23, 2009 · Senate
Published 8-3-2009.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote