Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 321

Operation of neighborhood electric vehicles

Topics: Motor vehicle, Motor vehicle: Driver's license, Municipality, Municipality: Ordinance, Road, Transportation, Department of: Roads, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 30, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 19, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 311

Latest entry in the official record, May 14, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a "neighborhood electric vehicle" (NEV) is a motor vehicle that is propelled by electric power and that meets certain standards for low-speed vehicles under federal law, but does not include a golf cart. A municipality may, by ordinance, allow the use of NEVs on roadways under its jurisdiction that have a speed limit of 35 miles per hour or less. However, a municipal ordinance may not allow the use of NEVs on connecting highways within the municipality, or where the municipality's roadways cross state trunk highways, unless all of the following apply: 1) the municipality provides written notice to the Department of Transportation (DOT) of the ordinance, including identification of any connecting highway or state trunk highway intersection to which the ordinance will apply; and 2) within 21 days of receiving this notice, DOT consents or fails to object to the use of NEVs on the connecting highway or through the intersection crossing the state trunk highway.

This bill expands municipal authority to allow operation of NEVs on roadways within the municipality. Under the bill, a municipal ordinance may allow the use of NEVs on any roadway within the municipality that has a speed limit of 35 miles per hour or less, regardless of whether the municipality has jurisdiction over the roadway.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 15, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 14, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 13, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 311.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Apr 21, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  6. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  7. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Apr 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Apr 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  10. Feb 11, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Jan 25, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  12. Jan 20, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  13. Jan 19, 2010

    The Senate passed it.

  14. Oct 15, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  15. Oct 15, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Sep 30, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  17. Sep 30, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Vinehout, Holperin, Lazich, Erpenbach, Cowles, Ellis, Schultz and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Danou, Jorgensen, Radcliffe, Wood, Zigmunt, Ballweg, Van Akkeren, Berceau, Kaufert, Pope-Roberts and Zepnick

  2. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  6. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  8. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  9. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  11. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  12. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  14. Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  15. Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  16. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Steinbrink

  17. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  18. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  19. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  20. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  21. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:39 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  22. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  24. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  27. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  29. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  30. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  31. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 concurred in

  32. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  33. Apr 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-26-2010

  34. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  35. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 311

  36. May 14, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-26-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote