Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 324

Providing instruction in human growth and development

Topics: Family, Guardian and ward, Nurses, Physician, School: Board, School: Health program, State Superintendent of Public Instruction

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 30, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a school board may provide an instructional program in human growth and development in grades kindergarten to 12 that may include instruction in the following areas: 1) self-esteem, responsible decision making, and personal responsibility; 2) interpersonal relationships; 3) discouragement of adolescent sexual activity; and 4) family life and skills required of a parent. The school board may also provide instruction in human sexuality, reproduction, family planning, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), prenatal development, childbirth, adoption, available prenatal and postnatal support, and male and female responsibility. If a school board offers instruction in any of these areas, it must also provide instruction in marriage and parental responsibility.

If a school district offers a human growth and development curriculum, the school board must appoint an advisory committee composed of parents, teachers, school administrators, pupils, health care professionals, members of the clergy, and other residents of the school district to assist the school board with the development, review, and implementation of the human growth and development curriculum. The advisory committee must also review the school district's curriculum at least every three years. Upon the written request of the pupil's parent or guardian, a pupil shall be exempted from the requirement to complete instruction in human growth and development.

Read the full summary

Under current law, a volunteer health care provider (provider) may apply to the Department of Administration to be permitted to provide health care services without charge in a school or nonprofit agency. If the provider wishes to provide services at a school, the provider must file the application jointly with the school board or, if the school is a charter school, the governing body of the school. "Volunteer health care provider" is defined under current law as a physician, dentist or dental hygienist, registered nurse, practical nurse, nurse-midwife, nurse practitioner, optometrist, physician assistant, or dietitian who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession or who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession when providing services at the school. Under current law, the provider may provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program complies with the requirements above, but may not provide instruction in human sexuality; reproduction; family planning, including natural family planning; HIV and AIDS; prenatal development; childbirth; adoption;

available prenatal and postnatal support; and male and female responsibility.

This bill provides that a school board may offer an instructional program in human growth and development. If the school board offers an instructional program in human growth and development, the bill requires that the program provide medically accurate information and, when age appropriate, address all of the following: 1) communication between the pupil and the pupil's parents or guardians about sexuality; 2) reproductive and sexual anatomy and physiology; 3) puberty, pregnancy, parenting, body image, and gender stereotypes; 4) skills to make responsible decisions about sexuality and sexual behavior throughout the pupil's life span; 5) the benefits of and reasons for abstaining from sexual activity; 6) the health benefits, side effects, and proper use of contraceptives and barrier methods approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections; 7) methods for developing healthy life skills, including setting goals, responsible decision making, communication, and stress management; 8) how alcohol or drug use affects responsible decision making; and 9) the impact of media and peer messages on thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to sexuality. In addition, the program must do all of the following: 1) use instructional methods and materials that do not promote bias against pupils of any race, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnic or cultural background or against sexually active pupils or children with disabilities; 2) promote self-esteem and positive interpersonal skills, with an emphasis on healthy relationships; and 3) identify counseling, medical, and legal resources for survivors of sexual abuse and assault, including resources for escaping violent relationships.

The bill defines medically accurate information as information that satisfies all of the following: 1) the information is supported by the weight of research conducted in compliance with accepted scientific methods; 2) where appropriate, the information is published in peer-reviewed journals; and 3) the information is recognized as accurate by relevant leading professional organizations or agencies, such as the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association, or the American Academy of Pediatrics. The bill defines "age appropriate" as suitable to a particular age group of pupils based on the developing cognitive and emotional capacity of and behaviors typical for the age group.

The bill permits a school district to eliminate from the human sexuality and development curriculum information that is not age appropriate. The bill requires each school board that elects not to offer human growth and development instruction to notify each pupil's parent or guardian of this fact. The bill also requires the state superintendent to apply for federal funds to implement an evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention program.

Finally, the bill permits a provider to provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program complies with the instructional program established in this bill.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. All 8 are Democrats.

25 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 33 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (25)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 27, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 27, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.

  3. Jan 27, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  4. Oct 29, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Oct 26, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Oct 6, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Sep 30, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  8. Sep 30, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Taylor, Lehman, Sullivan, Plale, Miller, Risser, Robson and Erpenbach;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Roys, Shilling, Berceau, Black, Kessler, Pasch, Fields, Vruwink, Turner, Soletski, Benedict, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Seidel, Danou, Pocan, Sinicki, Hintz, Smith, Bernard Schaber, Dexter, Hraychuck, Molepske Jr. and Zepnick

  2. Sep 30, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Oct 6, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 26, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor

  6. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Taylor

  7. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  8. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor

  9. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Olsen, Hopper and Grothman

  10. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Hopper

  11. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Hopper

  12. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman

  13. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman

  14. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman

  15. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  16. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  17. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  18. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote