Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 331

Prohibiting a person who has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent for committing certain serious crimes or who is the subject of a pending criminal charge or delinquency petition for committing a serious crime from being licensed, certified, or contracted with to provide child care, from being employed or contracted as a caregiver of a child care provider, or from being permitted to reside at a premises where child care is provided and making an appropriation

Topics: Children and Families, Department of, Children: Protection and services, County: Human services, Crime and criminals, Crime and criminals: Felony, Criminal identification and investigation, Day care, Fraud, Juvenile delinquency, Milwaukee County, School: Board, Sex crimes, Wisconsin Works

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 13, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 2, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 93 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 76

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 17, 2009: “Published 11-25-2009.”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) may not license a person to operate a day care center; DCF in a county having a population of 500,000 or more, a county department of human services or social services (county department), or an agency contracted by DCF to certify day care providers for purposes of reimbursement under the Wisconsin Works Program (contracted agency) may not certify a day care provider for those purposes; and a school board may not contract with a person to provide a day care program (collectively "child care provider") if the person has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent on or after his or her 12th birthday for committing a serious crime, as defined under current law, unless the person shows that he or she has been rehabilitated.

Similarly, a child care provider may not employ or contract with a caregiver or permit a nonclient resident to reside at a premises where child care is provided if the caregiver or nonclient resident has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent on or after his or her 12th birthday for committing a serious crime, as defined under current law, unless the caregiver or nonclient resident shows that he or she has been rehabilitated. Currently, "serious crime" is defined to include certain crimes against life or bodily security and certain crimes against children that are felonies.

Read the full summary

This bill prohibits any person who has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent on or after his or her 12th birthday for committing any of the following serious crimes or who is the subject of a pending criminal charge or delinquency petition alleging that the person has committed any of the following serious crimes on or after his or her 12th birthday from being licensed, certified, or contracted with to provide child care, from being employed or contracted as a caregiver of a child care provider, or from being permitted to be a nonclient resident of a premises where child care is provided and prohibits such a person from showing that he or she has been rehabilitated:

1. Any crime against children that is a felony, other than felony failure to pay child, spousal, or grandchild support or felony hazing.

2. Felony battery, if the victim is the spouse of the person.

3. First-degree or second-degree intentional or reckless homicide, felony murder, mayhem, felony sexual assault, reckless injury, taking hostages, kidnapping, felony endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon, disarming a police officer, armed burglary, or armed robbery.

4. A violation of the background check law, if the violation involves the provision of false information to DCF, a county department, a contracted agency, a school board, or a child care provider.

5. An offense involving fraudulent activity as a participant in the Wisconsin Works Program, including as a recipient of a child care subsidy under that program, or as a recipient of aid to families with dependent children, medical assistance, food stamp benefits, supplemental security payments, payments for the support of children of supplemental security income recipients, or health care benefits under the Badger Care program.

6. Any drug or alcohol-related felony, felony battery, carjacking, or felony hazing, if committed not more than five years before the date of the background investigation.

7. Felony failure to pay child, spousal, or grandchild support, if committed not more than five years before the date of the background investigation, unless the person has paid all arrearages and is meeting his or her current support obligation.

Current law requires DCF, a county department, a contracting agency, or a school board, prior to licensing, certifying, or contracting with a child care provider and every four years after that, to conduct a criminal history search of the child care provider, of all nonclient residents of the premises where the child care is provided, and of all persons under 18 years of age who are caregivers of the child care provider and to obtain certain other information with respect to those individuals, specifically: 1) information from the client abuse registry maintained by the Department of Health Services (DHS); 2) information maintained by the Department of Regulation and Licensing regarding the individual's credentials; 3) information maintained by DCF regarding any substantiated reports of child abuse or neglect against the individual; and 4) information maintained by DHS regarding any denial of a license, certification, or contract to provide child care, of employment as a caregiver of a child care provider, or of permission to reside at a premises where child care is provided. Similarly, current law also requires a child care provider to conduct such a criminal history search and to obtain that information with respect to a caregiver 18 years of age or over prior to employing or contracting with the caregiver and every four years after that.

This bill requires DCF, a county department, a contracting agency, or a school board to conduct that criminal history search and to obtain that information with respect to a child care provider every three months after the child care provider is licensed, certified, or contracted with and to conduct that search and obtain that information with respect to a nonclient resident or caregiver under 18 years of age every year after the nonclient resident is permitted to reside at the premises or the caregiver is employed or contracted with. The bill also requires a child care provider to conduct that criminal history search and to obtain that information every year after a caregiver 18 years of age or over is employed or contracted with. In addition to conducting that criminal history search and obtaining that information, the bill requires DCF, a county department, a contracting agency, a school board, or an entity to obtain on those timetables information that is contained in the sex offender registry maintained by the Department of Corrections regarding whether the person has committed a sex offense that is a serious crime.

Under current law, DCF may revoke the license of a person to operate a day care center if the licensee or a person under the supervision of the licensee commits certain actions, including a repeated or substantial violation of a rule or order of DCF or of a condition of licensure or an action that directly threatens the health, safety, or welfare of any child under the care of the licensee. Similarly, under current law, DCF or a county department may refuse to pay a child care provider for child care provided under the Wisconsin Works Program if the child care provider, an employee of the child care provider, or a person living on the premises where child care is provided is convicted of a felony or misdemeanor that substantially relates to the care of children, is the subject of a pending charge that substantiality relates to the care of children, or has been determined to have abused or neglected a child.

This bill requires all of the following:

1. DCF to revoke the license of a day care center; DCF in a county having a population of 500,000 or more, a county department, or a contracted agency to revoke the certification of a day care provider for purposes of reimbursement under the Wisconsin Works Program; and a school board to rescind the contract of the person to operate a day care program; if the person licensed to operate the day care center, the person certified as a child care provider, or the person contracting to provide the day care program is convicted of a serious crime or if a caregiver or nonclient resident of the day care center, child care provider, or day care program is convicted or adjudicated delinquent for committing a serious crime on or after his or her 12th birthday. The bill also requires DCF or a county department to refuse to pay a child care provider in those circumstances beginning on the date of the conviction or delinquency adjudication.

2. DCF to immediately suspend the license of a day care center; DCF in a county having a population of 500,000 or more, a county department, or a contracted agency to immediately suspend the certification of a day care provider for purposes of reimbursement under the Wisconsin Works Program; and a school board to immediately suspend the contract of a person to operate a day care program; if the person licensed to operate the day care center, the person certified as a child care provider, or the person contracting to provide the day care program is the subject of a pending criminal charge alleging that the person has committed a serious crime or if a caregiver or nonclient resident of the day care center, child care provider, or day care program is the subject of a pending charge or delinquency petition alleging that the person has committed a serious crime on or after his or her 12th birthday.

The bill also requires DCF or a county department to immediately suspend payment to a child care provider for any child care provided under the Wisconsin Works Program in those circumstances until DCF or the county department obtains information regarding the final disposition of the charge or delinquency proceeding indicating that the person is not ineligible to receive such a payment.

Who's behind it

12 senators are its ⁠. 10 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

29 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 41 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (29)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 19 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 15, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Nov 4, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 49 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 49, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 93 to 0 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 93, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 49 to 41 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 48 to 45 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 48, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 17, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 13, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 76.

  3. Nov 12, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 12, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Nov 5, 2009

    The Assembly passed it too, 93 to 0.

  6. Nov 5, 2009

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  7. Nov 5, 2009

    “Point of order that Assembly amendment 4 not germane pursuant to Assembly Rule 54 well taken” (the official wording)

  8. Nov 5, 2009

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Nov 5, 2009

    “Read” (the official wording)

  10. Nov 5, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  11. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.

  12. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  13. Nov 4, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  14. Nov 4, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  15. Nov 4, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  16. Nov 4, 2009

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)

  17. Nov 4, 2009

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)

  18. Oct 22, 2009

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  19. Oct 19, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Oct 19, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  21. Oct 15, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  22. Oct 15, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  23. Oct 14, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  24. Oct 8, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  25. Oct 7, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  26. Oct 2, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  27. Oct 2, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development.

  28. Oct 2, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 2, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Jauch, Vinehout, Taylor, Darling, Lehman, Holperin, Hansen, Cowles, Plale, Carpenter, Lassa and Sullivan;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Barca, Pasch, Fields, Toles, Young, Sinicki, Kessler, Cullen, Mason, Turner, Kestell, Shilling, Berceau, Ballweg, Vruwink, Hilgenberg, A. Ott, Pocan, Kaufert, Seidel, Jorgensen, Krusick and A. Williams

  2. Oct 2, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development

  3. Oct 2, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Coggs added as a coauthor

  4. Oct 6, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Jauch

  5. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 8, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    LRB correction

  9. Oct 14, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development

  12. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Oct 15, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Oct 19, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Hopper added as a coauthor

  15. Oct 19, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Oct 22, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  17. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  18. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  19. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  20. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  21. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  22. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  23. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  25. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 adopted

  27. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 adopted

  28. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles

  29. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15

  30. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles

  31. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 withdrawn and returned to author

  32. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles

  33. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15

  34. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 7 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles

  35. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15

  36. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 8 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman and Leibham

  37. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15

  38. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  39. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  40. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  41. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  42. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  43. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read

  44. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  45. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  46. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Spanbauer added as a cosponsor

  47. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kleefisch

  48. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43

  49. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Vos

  50. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44

  51. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Vos

  52. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44

  53. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Vos

  54. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly amendment 4 not germane pursuant to Assembly Rule 54 well taken

  55. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  56. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 49, Noes 43

  57. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Vos

  58. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 41

  59. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Vos

  60. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44

  61. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representative Vos

  62. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43

  63. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representative Vos

  64. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44

  65. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 offered by Representative Vos

  66. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 48, Noes 45

  67. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 offered by Representative Vos

  68. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44

  69. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 offered by Representative Kerkman

  70. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43

  71. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Smith added as a cosponsor

  72. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Representatives Molepske Jr. and Garthwaite added as cosponsors

  73. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  74. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  75. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 93, Noes 0

  76. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  77. Nov 6, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  78. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-9-2009

  79. Nov 12, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  80. Nov 12, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-12-2009

  81. Nov 13, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-13-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 76

  82. Nov 17, 2009 · Senate

    Published 11-25-2009.

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote