Senate Bill 331
Prohibiting a person who has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent for committing certain serious crimes or who is the subject of a pending criminal charge or delinquency petition for committing a serious crime from being licensed, certified, or contracted with to provide child care, from being employed or contracted as a caregiver of a child care provider, or from being permitted to reside at a premises where child care is provided and making an appropriation
Topics: Children and Families, Department of, Children: Protection and services, County: Human services, Crime and criminals, Crime and criminals: Felony, Criminal identification and investigation, Day care, Fraud, Juvenile delinquency, Milwaukee County, School: Board, Sex crimes, Wisconsin Works
Became law
The governor signed it on Nov 13, 2009. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 2, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Nov 5, 2009
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 93 to 0
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 76
Latest entry in the official record, Nov 17, 2009: “Published 11-25-2009.”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) may not license a person to operate a day care center; DCF in a county having a population of 500,000 or more, a county department of human services or social services (county department), or an agency contracted by DCF to certify day care providers for purposes of reimbursement under the Wisconsin Works Program (contracted agency) may not certify a day care provider for those purposes; and a school board may not contract with a person to provide a day care program (collectively "child care provider") if the person has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent on or after his or her 12th birthday for committing a serious crime, as defined under current law, unless the person shows that he or she has been rehabilitated.
Similarly, a child care provider may not employ or contract with a caregiver or permit a nonclient resident to reside at a premises where child care is provided if the caregiver or nonclient resident has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent on or after his or her 12th birthday for committing a serious crime, as defined under current law, unless the caregiver or nonclient resident shows that he or she has been rehabilitated. Currently, "serious crime" is defined to include certain crimes against life or bodily security and certain crimes against children that are felonies.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill prohibits any person who has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent on or after his or her 12th birthday for committing any of the following serious crimes or who is the subject of a pending criminal charge or delinquency petition alleging that the person has committed any of the following serious crimes on or after his or her 12th birthday from being licensed, certified, or contracted with to provide child care, from being employed or contracted as a caregiver of a child care provider, or from being permitted to be a nonclient resident of a premises where child care is provided and prohibits such a person from showing that he or she has been rehabilitated:
1. Any crime against children that is a felony, other than felony failure to pay child, spousal, or grandchild support or felony hazing.
2. Felony battery, if the victim is the spouse of the person.
3. First-degree or second-degree intentional or reckless homicide, felony murder, mayhem, felony sexual assault, reckless injury, taking hostages, kidnapping, felony endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon, disarming a police officer, armed burglary, or armed robbery.
4. A violation of the background check law, if the violation involves the provision of false information to DCF, a county department, a contracted agency, a school board, or a child care provider.
5. An offense involving fraudulent activity as a participant in the Wisconsin Works Program, including as a recipient of a child care subsidy under that program, or as a recipient of aid to families with dependent children, medical assistance, food stamp benefits, supplemental security payments, payments for the support of children of supplemental security income recipients, or health care benefits under the Badger Care program.
6. Any drug or alcohol-related felony, felony battery, carjacking, or felony hazing, if committed not more than five years before the date of the background investigation.
7. Felony failure to pay child, spousal, or grandchild support, if committed not more than five years before the date of the background investigation, unless the person has paid all arrearages and is meeting his or her current support obligation.
Current law requires DCF, a county department, a contracting agency, or a school board, prior to licensing, certifying, or contracting with a child care provider and every four years after that, to conduct a criminal history search of the child care provider, of all nonclient residents of the premises where the child care is provided, and of all persons under 18 years of age who are caregivers of the child care provider and to obtain certain other information with respect to those individuals, specifically: 1) information from the client abuse registry maintained by the Department of Health Services (DHS); 2) information maintained by the Department of Regulation and Licensing regarding the individual's credentials; 3) information maintained by DCF regarding any substantiated reports of child abuse or neglect against the individual; and 4) information maintained by DHS regarding any denial of a license, certification, or contract to provide child care, of employment as a caregiver of a child care provider, or of permission to reside at a premises where child care is provided. Similarly, current law also requires a child care provider to conduct such a criminal history search and to obtain that information with respect to a caregiver 18 years of age or over prior to employing or contracting with the caregiver and every four years after that.
This bill requires DCF, a county department, a contracting agency, or a school board to conduct that criminal history search and to obtain that information with respect to a child care provider every three months after the child care provider is licensed, certified, or contracted with and to conduct that search and obtain that information with respect to a nonclient resident or caregiver under 18 years of age every year after the nonclient resident is permitted to reside at the premises or the caregiver is employed or contracted with. The bill also requires a child care provider to conduct that criminal history search and to obtain that information every year after a caregiver 18 years of age or over is employed or contracted with. In addition to conducting that criminal history search and obtaining that information, the bill requires DCF, a county department, a contracting agency, a school board, or an entity to obtain on those timetables information that is contained in the sex offender registry maintained by the Department of Corrections regarding whether the person has committed a sex offense that is a serious crime.
Under current law, DCF may revoke the license of a person to operate a day care center if the licensee or a person under the supervision of the licensee commits certain actions, including a repeated or substantial violation of a rule or order of DCF or of a condition of licensure or an action that directly threatens the health, safety, or welfare of any child under the care of the licensee. Similarly, under current law, DCF or a county department may refuse to pay a child care provider for child care provided under the Wisconsin Works Program if the child care provider, an employee of the child care provider, or a person living on the premises where child care is provided is convicted of a felony or misdemeanor that substantially relates to the care of children, is the subject of a pending charge that substantiality relates to the care of children, or has been determined to have abused or neglected a child.
This bill requires all of the following:
1. DCF to revoke the license of a day care center; DCF in a county having a population of 500,000 or more, a county department, or a contracted agency to revoke the certification of a day care provider for purposes of reimbursement under the Wisconsin Works Program; and a school board to rescind the contract of the person to operate a day care program; if the person licensed to operate the day care center, the person certified as a child care provider, or the person contracting to provide the day care program is convicted of a serious crime or if a caregiver or nonclient resident of the day care center, child care provider, or day care program is convicted or adjudicated delinquent for committing a serious crime on or after his or her 12th birthday. The bill also requires DCF or a county department to refuse to pay a child care provider in those circumstances beginning on the date of the conviction or delinquency adjudication.
2. DCF to immediately suspend the license of a day care center; DCF in a county having a population of 500,000 or more, a county department, or a contracted agency to immediately suspend the certification of a day care provider for purposes of reimbursement under the Wisconsin Works Program; and a school board to immediately suspend the contract of a person to operate a day care program; if the person licensed to operate the day care center, the person certified as a child care provider, or the person contracting to provide the day care program is the subject of a pending criminal charge alleging that the person has committed a serious crime or if a caregiver or nonclient resident of the day care center, child care provider, or day care program is the subject of a pending charge or delinquency petition alleging that the person has committed a serious crime on or after his or her 12th birthday.
The bill also requires DCF or a county department to immediately suspend payment to a child care provider for any child care provided under the Wisconsin Works Program in those circumstances until DCF or the county department obtains information regarding the final disposition of the charge or delinquency proceeding indicating that the person is not ineligible to receive such a payment.
Who's behind it
12 senators are its . 10 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.
29 more lawmakers .
See all 41 names Hide the names
Authors (12)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (29)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Annette Williams · Democrat, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- David Cullen · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Randy Hopper · Republican, Senate
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Margaret Krusick · Democrat, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Molepske Jr. and Garthwaite
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Pocan · Democrat, Assembly
- Donna Seidel · Democrat, Assembly
- Shilling
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Toles · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
- Amendment AA1-SB331
- Amendment AA2-SB331
- Amendment AA3-SB331
- Amendment AA4-SB331
- Amendment AA5-SB331
- Amendment AA6-SB331
- Amendment AA7-SB331
- Amendment AA8-SB331
- Amendment AA9-SB331
- Amendment AA10-SB331
- Amendment AA11-SB331
- Amendment SA1-SB331
- Amendment SA2-SB331
- Amendment SA3-SB331
- Amendment SA1-SA3-SB331
- Amendment SA4-SB331
- Amendment SA5-SB331
- Amendment SA6-SB331
- Amendment SA7-SB331
- Amendment SA8-SB331
- LC Amendment Memo
How lawmakers voted
There were 19 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 15, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 0 · Nov 4, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Passed, 49 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 49, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 93 to 0 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 93, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 49 to 41 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 48 to 45 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 48, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 32 to 0 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Nov 17, 2009
The new law was published.
-
Nov 13, 2009
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 76.
-
Nov 12, 2009
Sent to the governor.
-
Nov 12, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 5, 2009
The Assembly passed it too, 93 to 0.
-
Nov 5, 2009
3 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Nov 5, 2009
“Point of order that Assembly amendment 4 not germane pursuant to Assembly Rule 54 well taken” (the official wording)
-
Nov 5, 2009
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Nov 5, 2009
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Nov 5, 2009
The Assembly received it.
-
Nov 5, 2009
The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.
-
Nov 5, 2009
The Senate adopted it.
-
Nov 4, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.
-
Nov 4, 2009
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Nov 4, 2009
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Nov 4, 2009
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)
-
Nov 4, 2009
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)
-
Oct 22, 2009
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Oct 19, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 19, 2009
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Oct 15, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 15, 2009
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 14, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 8, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 7, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 2, 2009
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Oct 2, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development.
-
Oct 2, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 2, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Jauch, Vinehout, Taylor, Darling, Lehman, Holperin, Hansen, Cowles, Plale, Carpenter, Lassa and Sullivan;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Barca, Pasch, Fields, Toles, Young, Sinicki, Kessler, Cullen, Mason, Turner, Kestell, Shilling, Berceau, Ballweg, Vruwink, Hilgenberg, A. Ott, Pocan, Kaufert, Seidel, Jorgensen, Krusick and A. Williams
- Oct 2, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development
- Oct 2, 2009 · Senate
Senator Coggs added as a coauthor
- Oct 6, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Jauch
- Oct 7, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 8, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 14, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 14, 2009 · Senate
LRB correction
- Oct 14, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 15, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 15, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development
- Oct 15, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 15, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 19, 2009 · Senate
Senator Hopper added as a coauthor
- Oct 19, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 22, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 adopted
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 3 adopted
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 withdrawn and returned to author
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 6 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 7 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman, Leibham and Cowles
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 8 offered by Senators Darling, Lazich, Schultz, Hopper, Kanavas, Kapanke, Grothman and Leibham
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Representative Spanbauer added as a cosponsor
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kleefisch
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly amendment 4 not germane pursuant to Assembly Rule 54 well taken
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair appealed
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 49, Noes 43
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 41
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 9 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 48, Noes 45
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 10 offered by Representative Vos
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 11 offered by Representative Kerkman
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Representative Smith added as a cosponsor
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Representatives Molepske Jr. and Garthwaite added as cosponsors
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 93, Noes 0
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 6, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Nov 9, 2009 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 11-9-2009
- Nov 12, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 12, 2009 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 11-12-2009
- Nov 13, 2009 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 11-13-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 76
- Nov 17, 2009 · Senate
Published 11-25-2009.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote