Senate Bill 358
Creating new grounds for discipline of hearing instrument specialists, audiologists, and speech-language pathologists, changing licensing requirements for audiologists, and granting rule-making authority
Topics: Advertisement: Fraudulent, Regulation and Licensing, Department of, Reorganization of state government, Trades and occupations
Became law
The governor signed it on May 14, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 20, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 356
Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2010: “Published 5-27-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes the following changes to the regulation of speech-language pathologists and audiologists.
Prohibited conduct .
Read the full summary Show less
1.
Deceptive advertising . Under current law, the Hearing and Speech Examining Board (board) in the Department of Regulation and Licensing (department) may reprimand the holder of a license or permit issued by the board or revoke, suspend, limit, or deny a license or permit if the holder or applicant engages in certain prohibited conduct, including false, misleading, or deceptive advertising. The bill prohibits deceptive advertising instead of false, misleading, or deceptive advertising. In addition, the bill creates a definition for "deceptive advertising," which includes creating or using promotional literature, testimonials, insignia, or other representation which is misleading, false, or untruthful.
2.
Misrepresentation . The bill prohibits the holder of a license or permit from making an intentional or negligent representation regarding a hearing aid or services. The bill also prohibits the holder of a license or permit from misusing words that imply the involvement of the medical or audiology professions when there is no such involvement. Finally, the bill prohibits a hearing instrument specialist from intentionally or negligently misrepresenting the cause of a hearing impairment, or the cure of a hearing impairment by the use of a hearing aid.
Audiologist license . Under current law, a person seeking an audiologist license must have received a master's degree in audiology or completed education or training that the board determines is substantially equivalent. The person must also complete a postgraduate clinical fellowship in audiology approved by the board or substantially equivalent education or training. The person must also pass an examination required for certification by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association or a substantially equivalent exam, as well as practical techniques tests administered by the board. The board may grant a license to practice audiology to a person who holds a current audiologist license in another state or United States territory if the board determines that the requirements for licensure are substantially equivalent to the requirements in this state.
With certain exceptions, the bill changes the requirements for audiologist licensure effective January 1, 2010. Beginning on that date, to obtain an audiologist license a person must do all of the following:
1. Either possess a doctoral degree in audiology or submit evidence of substantially equivalent education or training. The doctoral degree program must consist of not less than three years of educational course work and not less than 12 months of clinical rotation or externship.
2. Pass an exam selected or approved by the board as well as practical techniques tests administered by the board. The bill requires the board to select and approve examinations for audiology by rule. The bill authorizes the board to grant a license to practice audiology to a person who holds a current audiologist license in another state or United States territory if the applicant received a masters degree in audiology or completed education or training that the board determines is substantially equivalent and the board determines that the requirements for licensure are substantially equivalent to the requirements in this state.
Temporary license to practice audiology . Under current law, the board may grant a temporary license to practice audiology to a person who is completing a postgraduate fellowship if the person practices under the supervision of a licensed audiologist and satisfies other requirements. The bill eliminates temporary licensure for a person completing a postgraduate fellowship effective January 1, 2010. The bill permits the board to grant a temporary license to practice audiology to a person who satisfies all the requirements for licensure but who has not completed the practical techniques tests administered by the board.
Other changes . Under current law, a corporation or mercantile establishment that sells or offers to sell hearing aids must employ a person licensed by the department as a hearing aid specialist or licensed or permitted by the board to practice audiology. The corporation or mercantile establishment must annually file with the board a list of persons employed to sell or fit hearing aids. This bill eliminates the annual filing requirement.
Under current law, persons who use audiometric equipment to evaluate hearing sensitivity for the fitting and sale of hearing aids must periodically calibrate the equipment and send certification of the calibration to the board. This bill eliminates the requirement that a certificate of calibration be sent to the board.
Under current law, a Council on Speech Language Pathology and Audiology (council) in the department serves the board in an advisory capacity. This bill eliminates the council.
Who's behind it
4 senators are its . 2 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 11 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (7)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Newcomer · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Health vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 19, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 17, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 14, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 356.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Apr 13, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate passed it.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 19, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Mar 19, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 3, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 27, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 20, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.
-
Oct 20, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 20, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lehman, Taylor, Olsen and Kedzie;Cosponsored by Representatives Zepnick, Turner, Kerkman, Danou, A. Ott, Newcomer and Townsend
- Oct 20, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Oct 27, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 6, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 1, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lehman
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:12 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Apr 23, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-23-2010
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 14, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 356
- May 17, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-27-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote