Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 365

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

the Uniform Unsworn Foreign Declarations Act and providing a penalty.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a person may be required to swear to or affirm the truth of

a statement he or she has given or will give. A sworn or affirmed statement may be

required in court proceedings, administrative proceedings, real estate or probate

matters, and other legal matters.

Under current law, a person who gives a sworn or affirmed statement that the

person does not believe to be true is guilty of false swearing and is subject to a fine

not to exceed $10,000 and, depending on the circumstances, imprisonment not to

exceed nine months or imprisonment not to exceed six years, or both the fine and a

period of imprisonment. A person who gives a sworn or affirmed statement that is

inconsistent with another statement he or she gave under oath or affirmation is also

guilty of false swearing and is subject to a fine not to exceed $10,000, imprisonment

not to exceed six years, or both.

Under this bill, a statement that is unsworn and not affirmed may be given the

same effect as a sworn or affirmed statement if the person making the statement is

outside the geographic boundaries of the United States and if he or she signs a

statement declaring, under penalty of false swearing, that his or her statement is

true and correct. Under the bill, a statement that is unsworn and not affirmed may

not be used in place of a sworn or affirmed statement in a deposition, an oath of office,

an oath that is required to be given before a specific official (except a notary public),

a document required to record a real estate transfer, or an oath or affirmation

required for certain wills.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,

the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a

report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to

result if the bill is enacted.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Miller (D) , Risser (D) , Taylor (D)

2 cosponsors

Cullen (D) , Molepske Jr. (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 19, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 24, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Risser, Miller and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Cullen and Molepske Jr.

  2. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Dec 15, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 12, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Jan 25, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-26-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  9. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  10. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  11. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  13. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  14. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  17. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  18. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  19. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules

  20. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-11-2010

  27. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  28. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 166

  29. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2010