Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
payment of judgments in traffic courts and municipal courts by installments and the suspension of operating privileges.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a person is found guilty of violating a traffic regulation,
the court may enter judgment against the defendant for the forfeiture and for any
applicable costs, fees, and surcharges. In addition, the court may suspend or revoke
the person's operating privilege for a period not exceeding one year. This bill requires
the court, when entering judgment, to tell the defendant, or to notify the defendant
if he or she is not present in court, that he or she should notify the court if he or she
is unable to pay the judgment because of poverty. The bill requires the court to
determine if the defendant is unable to pay the judgment because of poverty, and if
so, to give the defendant the opportunity to pay the judgment in installments, based
on the defendant's income, before suspending the defendant's operating privilege for
failure to pay the judgment.
Under current law, if a defendant is found guilty in municipal court of an
ordinance violation, the court orders the defendant to pay a forfeiture, restitution,
and applicable surcharges and informs the defendant of the date on which the
judgment must be paid and of the penalties of failure to pay the judgment, including
imprisonment and operating privilege suspension. The bill requires the municipal
court to also notify the defendant at the time the judgment is rendered that, if the
defendant cannot pay the judgment because of poverty, he or she should notify the
court. If a judgment is not paid, current law allows the municipal court to defer
payments, provide for installment payments of the judgment, allow the defendant
to perform community service in lieu of paying the judgment, suspend the
defendant's operating privilege, or imprison the defendant for up to 90 days. This
bill prohibits the judge from ordering the defendant imprisoned or the suspension of
the defendant's operating privilege if the defendant has notified the municipal court
of his or her poverty unless the defendant fails to comply with the court order to pay
the judgment in installments or to perform community service work.
Currently, a person found guilty of violating a traffic regulation or ordinance
who fails to pay the ordered judgment may be imprisoned for up to 90 days or may
have his or her operating privilege suspended for 30 days or until the judgment is
paid, but not to exceed two years. Under this bill, if a court has suspended a person's
operating privilege for failure to pay a judgment, the court may terminate the
ordered operating privilege suspension and substitute an installment plan for the
payment of the judgment. The bill requires the court to terminate the ordered
operating privilege suspension and substitute an installment plan for the payment
of the judgment if the defendant is unable to pay the judgment because of poverty
and the defendant has not previously failed to comply with a court-ordered
installment plan.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 12, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 2
Passed 31–2 Feb 24, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 3
Passed 6–3 Mar 13, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 53, Noes 45
Passed 53–45 Mar 24, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 3, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor, Lehman and Plale;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Kessler, Berceau, Colon, Fields, Mason, Roys, Sinicki, Toles, Turner, A. Williams, Young and A. Ott
- Feb 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Feb 5, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 11, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 12, 2009 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 16, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 18, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-24-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 20, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor
- Feb 23, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Taylor
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 2
- Feb 24, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Mar 10, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 11, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 13, 2009 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 3
- Mar 13, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-24-2009 by committee on Rules
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Grigsby and Seidel
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 53, Noes 45
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 25, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 25, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 20, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-23-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Assembly amendment 1 concurred in
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 27, 2009 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-27-2009
- May 28, 2009 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-28-2009
- May 29, 2009 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-29-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 17
- Jun 5, 2009 · Senate
Published 6-12-2009.