Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 37

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

payment of judgments in traffic courts and municipal courts by installments and the suspension of operating privileges.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, if a person is found guilty of violating a traffic regulation,

the court may enter judgment against the defendant for the forfeiture and for any

applicable costs, fees, and surcharges. In addition, the court may suspend or revoke

the person's operating privilege for a period not exceeding one year. This bill requires

the court, when entering judgment, to tell the defendant, or to notify the defendant

if he or she is not present in court, that he or she should notify the court if he or she

is unable to pay the judgment because of poverty. The bill requires the court to

determine if the defendant is unable to pay the judgment because of poverty, and if

so, to give the defendant the opportunity to pay the judgment in installments, based

on the defendant's income, before suspending the defendant's operating privilege for

failure to pay the judgment.

Under current law, if a defendant is found guilty in municipal court of an

ordinance violation, the court orders the defendant to pay a forfeiture, restitution,

and applicable surcharges and informs the defendant of the date on which the

judgment must be paid and of the penalties of failure to pay the judgment, including

imprisonment and operating privilege suspension. The bill requires the municipal

court to also notify the defendant at the time the judgment is rendered that, if the

defendant cannot pay the judgment because of poverty, he or she should notify the

court. If a judgment is not paid, current law allows the municipal court to defer

payments, provide for installment payments of the judgment, allow the defendant

to perform community service in lieu of paying the judgment, suspend the

defendant's operating privilege, or imprison the defendant for up to 90 days. This

bill prohibits the judge from ordering the defendant imprisoned or the suspension of

the defendant's operating privilege if the defendant has notified the municipal court

of his or her poverty unless the defendant fails to comply with the court order to pay

the judgment in installments or to perform community service work.

Currently, a person found guilty of violating a traffic regulation or ordinance

who fails to pay the ordered judgment may be imprisoned for up to 90 days or may

have his or her operating privilege suspended for 30 days or until the judgment is

paid, but not to exceed two years. Under this bill, if a court has suspended a person's

operating privilege for failure to pay a judgment, the court may terminate the

ordered operating privilege suspension and substitute an installment plan for the

payment of the judgment. The bill requires the court to terminate the ordered

operating privilege suspension and substitute an installment plan for the payment

of the judgment if the defendant is unable to pay the judgment because of poverty

and the defendant has not previously failed to comply with a court-ordered

installment plan.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Lehman (D) , Plale (D) , Taylor (D)

13 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Colon (D) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Roys (D) , Sinicki (D) , Toles (D) , Turner (D) , Young (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 12, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 2

Passed 31–2 Feb 24, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 3

Passed 6–3 Mar 13, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 53, Noes 45

Passed 53–45 Mar 24, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 3, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Taylor, Lehman and Plale;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Kessler, Berceau, Colon, Fields, Mason, Roys, Sinicki, Toles, Turner, A. Williams, Young and A. Ott

  2. Feb 3, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Feb 5, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 11, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Feb 12, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  6. Feb 12, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Feb 16, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Feb 18, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-24-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  9. Feb 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor

  10. Feb 23, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Taylor

  11. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  14. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  15. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 2

  18. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  21. Mar 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  22. Mar 11, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  23. Mar 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  24. Mar 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  25. Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-24-2009 by committee on Rules

  26. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  27. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Grigsby and Seidel

  28. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  29. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  31. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 53, Noes 45

  32. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Mar 25, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  34. Mar 25, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  35. Apr 20, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-23-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  36. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Assembly amendment 1 concurred in

  37. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  38. Apr 27, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-27-2009

  39. May 28, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-28-2009

  40. May 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-29-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 17

  41. Jun 5, 2009 · Senate

    Published 6-12-2009.