Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 371

Authorizing the Department of Public Instruction, the University of Wisconsin System, the Technical College System, and the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities to study each other's education programs, requiring a written agreement concerning such studies, and requiring the establishment of a longitudinal data system of student data

Topics: Parochial and private educational institutions, Privacy, Public Instruction, Department of, Technical college, University of Wisconsin

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 9, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 28, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 73 to 20

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 59

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 12, 2009: “Published 11-23-2009.”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill directs the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, the Technical College System Board, the Department of Public Instruction, and the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (agencies) to enter into a written agreement that:

1. Requires the agencies to establish a longitudinal data system of student data that links such data from preschool programs through postsecondary education programs.

Read the full summary

2. Describes the process by which any of the agencies may evaluate and study education programs operated or supervised by one or more of the other agencies.

3. Requires an agency to obtain the approval of, and enter into a written agreement with, the other agency before it can study or evaluate the latter agency's education programs.

4. Requires the agencies to exchange student data to the extent necessary to perform the evaluation or study.

5. Allows the agencies to collaborate with other persons, including state agencies, to import workforce or other data into the longitudinal data system to assist with an evaluation or study.

The bill authorizes the agencies to submit student data to the longitudinal data system, to another agency, or to a public or private research organization to support an evaluation or study. If the student data contains personally identifiable information, however, an agency's disclosure must be in connection with a data-sharing agreement that:

1. Specifies the purpose, scope, and duration of the agreement.

2. Requires the recipient to use personally identifiable information only for the purpose specified.

3. Describes the specific data access, use, and security restrictions with which the recipient must comply.

4. Requires that the personally identifiable information be destroyed or returned when no longer needed or upon expiration of the data-sharing agreement, whichever occurs first.

5. If the disclosure is to a public or private research organization, prohibits the personal identification of any person by individuals other than authorized representatives of the recipient who have legitimate interests in the information.

Who's behind it

Committee on Education is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

  • Committee on Education

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 30, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 73 to 20 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 73, Noes 20”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 76 to 17 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 76, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 80 to 13 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 80, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 25 to 7 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 25, Noes 7”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 12, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 9, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 59.

  3. Nov 9, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 5, 2009

    The Assembly passed it too, 73 to 20.

  5. Nov 5, 2009

    “Read” (the official wording)

  6. Nov 5, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate passed it, 25 to 7.

  8. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Nov 5, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  10. Nov 5, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Nov 4, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Nov 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Oct 30, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  14. Oct 30, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)

  15. Oct 28, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Oct 28, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  17. Oct 28, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by committee on Education

  2. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Hansen

  4. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 30, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education

  7. Oct 30, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  8. Oct 30, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  11. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Taylor added as a coauthor

  14. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  16. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 25, Noes 7

  19. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read

  22. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  23. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Krusick

  25. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 76, Noes 17

  26. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Krusick

  27. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 80, Noes 13

  28. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  30. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 73, Noes 20

  31. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Nov 6, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  33. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-9-2009

  34. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-9-2009

  35. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-9-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 59

  36. Nov 12, 2009 · Senate

    Published 11-23-2009.

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote