Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
notice of firearm prohibition when served with notice of an injunction hearing and process for surrendering firearms following the granting of certain injunctions.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a person is prohibited from possessing a firearm and must
surrender any firearm he or she currently possesses if he or she is subject to a
domestic abuse injunction, a child abuse injunction, or, if the court determines that
he or she may use a firearm to harm another or endanger public safety, a harassment
injunction (injunction). A person who is subject to an injunction may surrender his
or her firearm to a sheriff or to a third party approved by the court and is guilty of
a Class G felony if convicted of possessing a firearm while subject to the injunction.
This bill creates a procedure for notifying a person of the prohibition against
possessing a firearm and of the requirement to surrender any firearm when the
person is served with a petition for an injunction hearing.
The bill also creates a procedure for surrendering firearms if the court grants
an injunction. If the person who is subject to the injunction (respondent) is present
at the injunction hearing, he or she may provide the court with a completed firearm
possession form, which is a form that requests information such as the quantity and
the make and model of any firearms he or she owns or possesses or has owned or
possessed in the previous six months. If the respondent is not present at the
injunctive hearing, the court must provide the petitioner with the opportunity to
state if the respondent possesses a firearm and, if so, the quantity and make and
model of any firearm. If the court is not satisfied that the respondent does not possess
a firearm, a firearm surrender hearing must take place within one week of the
injunction hearing. If, subject to certain conditions, the respondent surrenders all
firearms to the sheriff or to a third party within 48 hours, the court must dismiss the
firearm surrender hearing unless the court has a reason related to the surrender of
firearms not to dismiss the hearing.
If the court does not dismiss the hearing, a respondent must attend a firearm
surrender hearing if the respondent did not appear at the injunction hearing and the
court is not satisfied that the respondent does not possess a firearm or the respondent
wants to surrender a firearm to a third party that did not appear at the injunction
hearing. If a respondent is required to attend the hearing but does not, the court
must issue an arrest warrant for the respondent.
At a firearm surrender hearing, if the respondent wants to surrender a firearm
to a third party who attends the firearm surrender hearing, the court shall, subject
to certain conditions, permit the surrender. If the third party is not at the firearm
surrender hearing or the conditions are not met, or the respondent does not want to
surrender a firearm to a third party, the court must order the respondent to
surrender his or her firearm to the sheriff within 48 hours of the order. If the
respondent fails to comply with the order, the court must issue an arrest warrant for
the respondent.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Coggs (D) , Jauch (D) , Lassa (D) , Risser (D) , Robson (D) , Taylor (D)
21 cosponsors
A. Ott (R) , Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hebl (D) , Hraychuck (D) , Kestell (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Milroy (D) , Newcomer (R) , Parisi (D) , Pasch (D) , Richards (D) , Roys (D) , Seidel (D) , Sinicki (D) , Staskunas (D) , Toles (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)
Full history
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor, Robson, Lassa, Jauch, Risser and Coggs;Cosponsored by Representatives Bernard Schaber, Staskunas, Parisi, Berceau, Roys, Turner, Fields, Pasch, Milroy, A. Ott, Hraychuck, Richards, Sinicki, Kestell, Hebl, Zepnick, Seidel, Grigsby, Toles, LeMahieu and Newcomer
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Nov 17, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 18, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 19, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 2, 2009 · Senate
Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes
- Jan 5, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor
- Feb 3, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Taylor
- Feb 4, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 5, 2010 · Senate
Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1