Senate Bill 383
Municipal court elections, judges, and procedure, and providing penalties
Topics: Court: Clerk, Court: Fee, Court: Municipal, Court: Procedure, Judge, Municipality: Ordinance, Supreme Court
Became law
The governor signed it on May 18, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 3, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 28, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 402
Latest entry in the official record, May 20, 2010: “Published 6-1-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes numerous changes regarding municipal court administration, judges, and procedures. Municipal courts operate in the cities, villages, and towns of this state to enforce municipal ordinances. Generally, the procedures in municipal court are less stringent than in circuit court, and violations of ordinances may result in a civil forfeiture. The bill makes all of the following changes:
1. Makes municipal courts subject to the authority of the supreme court, through the chief judge of the judicial administrative district.
Read the full summary Show less
2. Requires, in addition to current law that requires only the adoption of an ordinance for a court to exist, that the court must submit written notice of the ordinance to the director of state courts and receive certification from the chief judge of the judicial administrative district.
3. Provides that the municipal court budget or line item be separate from the budget of all other municipal departments.
4. Allows a municipal court to appoint a social worker to assist the court in determining if a defendant lacks substantial mental capacity to understand the proceeding or to assist in his or her defense. Currently, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem in those situations. The new provision gives the court an alternative choice of whom to appoint, and further clarifies that a determination of incompetency results in the suspension of the proceedings.
5. Requires municipal judges to be elected for four-year terms, rather than the two- to four-year terms as provided by ordinance under current law.
6. Gives municipal judges statewide jurisdiction.
7. Requires the municipality to provide the judge with an office or appropriate work space and removes the restriction on a municipal judge from having an office with a law partner.
8. Requires the municipality to authorize at least one clerk position for the municipal court and gives the municipal judge authority over the hiring, work responsibilities, and firing of court personnel. The bill provides that the judge's supervisory authority is a prohibited subject of collective bargaining for court personnel who are not employed by a city of the first class and requires the clerk to attend continuing education programs approved by the supreme court.
9. Requires the municipal judge to store all municipal court records in an appropriate facility designated by the municipality.
10. Requires a municipal judge to wear a black robe while presiding in a municipal court and prohibits the clerk from wearing anything that implies or indicates he or she is a law enforcement employee.
11. Prohibits the municipality from locating the municipal court or the court personnel within the municipal police department and gives the judge the authority to establish court hours, while requiring the municipality to provide an adequate courtroom for the municipal court.
12. Requires each municipal court to have a telephone number or extension separate from any other governmental department.
13. Allows service of the summons and complaint by first class mail, in addition to the current methods of service that are identical to those permitted in circuit court, but does not allow the suspension of a person's operating privilege or issuance of a warrant if the defendant was served by mail.
14. Requires the law enforcement officer or municipal employee who serves a summons and complaint to indicate the method of service on the documents filed with the court.
15. Clarifies that a citation or complaint may be used to start the municipal court action, and the action is commenced when the citation or complaint is filed with the court.
16. Includes in the citation or complaint a statement as to whether the judge mandates that the person make a personal appearance.
17. Includes in the citation or complaint the identification of a permit issued to the defendant or the license number of the defendant, if appropriate.
18. Allows a citation or complaint to be amended after the initial appearance of the defendant only at the discretion of the court after a hearing or at the trial by the court to conform to the evidence.
19. Requires the service of a copy of an amended complaint when amendment is made before an initial appearance.
20. Clarifies that a defendant may appear in municipal court in person or by submitting a written response to the citation or complaint, except when the court requires the defendant to appear in person.
21. Limits the time that a defendant may be detained in jail to 48 hours if the defendant failed to make an initial appearance or make a deposit, if the court issued a warrant to bring the defendant before the court.
22. Provides that the municipal court may schedule a pretrial conference in those cases where a trial has been requested, and if the parties come to an agreement at the conference, the court may approve the agreement or disapprove the agreement and proceed to trial.
23. Clarifies that when a transfer of a case is made because of a request for the substitution of a judge, the parties, including the prosecutor, remain the same, and the amount of the judgment, if any, is paid to the original municipal court from which the case was transferred.
24. Provides that if a municipal judge disqualifies himself or herself, the case shall be transferred to another judge in the same manner as a judge substitution transfer.
25. Allows a municipal judge who is to be temporarily absent, sick, or disabled, subject to the order of the chief judge of the judicial administrative district, to designate another municipal judge within the state to perform his or her duties. This provision replaces language that allowed the municipal judge to deliver the case to the circuit court for disposition. If the municipal judge was in the first judicial administrative district, currently the municipal judge could also designate, for a period of not more than 30 days, a municipal judge from within the state to perform his or her duties. If the municipal judge was from another judicial administrative district, current law allows the municipal judge to designate, for a period of not more than 30 days, a municipal judge from within that district to perform his or her duties.
26. Allows a chief judge of the judicial administrative district to designate any municipal judge within the state temporarily to perform the duties of municipal judge when there is a permanent vacancy in the office of municipal judge.
27. Requires the municipality to provide a prosecutor for municipal court cases and allows telephonic or audiovisual testimony at any proceeding.
28. Allows a municipal court to order community service work in lieu of restitution without needing the defendant's agreement but still needing the agreement of the person to whom the restitution is owed and the agreement of the organization where the community service work would occur.
29. Allows the municipal court to order a defendant to pay restitution for any nontraffic ordinance violation or for any drunk driving ordinance violation.
30. Clarifies that the municipal court may order the suspension of a defendant's operating privilege if the violation was related to the operation of a motor vehicle, which includes nonmoving traffic offenses, or if the judgment is ordered under the juvenile justice code. The bill gives a credit of not less than $50 for each day of imprisonment.
31. Provides that a municipal court may order that a defendant be imprisoned for up to 90 days for failure to pay the amount of the judgment only if the defendant has the ability to pay the judgment, has failed to perform community service, has failed to attend a hearing to determine if he or she is indigent, or has failed to complete a drug assessment of treatment program.
32. Allows the municipal court to order the assignment of up to 25 percent of the defendant's income, including lottery winning, for the payment of the judgment and provides procedural safeguards.
33. Changes the time frame for the court to pay any money the court receives to the municipal treasurer from 7 days to 30 days.
34. Removes the requirement that the transcript of a municipal court judgment include the vocation of the defendant.
35. Allows the reopening of a judgment at any time by either party under some of the specified conditions used in circuit court, rather than by only the defendant, and allows reopening a judgment within six months in certain situations.
36. Requires the court to reopen a default judgment on the motion of the defendant if the judgment was based on service by mail, while prohibiting any appeal of a default judgment.
37. Specifies that contempt of court involves intentional acts in the presence of the court that interfere with the proceedings or administration of justice or that impair the respect due to the court, or refusal of a witness to appear without reasonable excuse.
38. Increases the maximum penalty for contempt of court from a $50 forfeiture to a $200 forfeiture, allows imprisonment of up to 7 days, and provides that the penalty be imposed immediately after the contempt occurs only to preserve order in the court or protect the authority of the court and only after the person who committed the contempt is allowed to address the court.
39. Allows the municipal court to issue a warrant to bring a witness before the court for the contempt of court for failing to appear, to order the witness to testify, and to order the witness to pay the cost of apprehending him or her, plus any ordered forfeiture for the contempt.
Who's behind it
4 senators are its . All 4 are Democrats.
12 more lawmakers .
See all 16 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (12)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Thomas Lothian · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Joe Parisi · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Donna Seidel · Democrat, Assembly
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts vote on an amendment
Passed, 12 to 0 · Mar 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 20, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 18, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 402.
-
May 13, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 20, 2010
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Apr 16, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Mar 16, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 16, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 1.
-
Feb 24, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 1, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts.
-
Feb 1, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate passed it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Jan 13, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Dec 1, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 17, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 3, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Nov 3, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor, Risser, Erpenbach and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Seidel, Parisi, Pope-Roberts, Turner, Tauchen, Pasch, Staskunas, Lothian, Berceau, Danou and Townsend
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Nov 17, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 1, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 12, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 13, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Jan 13, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 13, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senator Miller added as a coauthor
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Seidel
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Kessler
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Parisi
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 11, Noes 1
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 11, Noes 1
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 12:01 P.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendments 1 and 3 adopted
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Assembly amendment 1 concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Assembly amendment 3 concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-28-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 18, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 402
- May 20, 2010 · Senate
Published 6-1-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote