Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
municipal court elections, judges, and procedure, and providing penalties.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes numerous changes regarding municipal court administration,
judges, and procedures. Municipal courts operate in the cities, villages, and towns
of this state to enforce municipal ordinances. Generally, the procedures in municipal
court are less stringent than in circuit court, and violations of ordinances may result
in a civil forfeiture. The bill makes all of the following changes:
1. Makes municipal courts subject to the authority of the supreme court,
through the chief judge of the judicial administrative district.
2. Requires, in addition to current law that requires only the adoption of an
ordinance for a court to exist, that the court must submit written notice of the
ordinance to the director of state courts and receive certification from the chief judge
of the judicial administrative district.
3. Provides that the municipal court budget or line item be separate from the
budget of all other municipal departments.
4. Allows a municipal court to appoint a social worker to assist the court in
determining if a defendant lacks substantial mental capacity to understand the
proceeding or to assist in his or her defense. Currently, the court may appoint a
guardian ad litem in those situations. The new provision gives the court an
alternative choice of whom to appoint, and further clarifies that a determination of
incompetency results in the suspension of the proceedings.
5. Requires municipal judges to be elected for four-year terms, rather than the
two- to four-year terms as provided by ordinance under current law.
6. Gives municipal judges statewide jurisdiction.
7. Requires the municipality to provide the judge with an office or appropriate
work space and removes the restriction on a municipal judge from having an office
with a law partner.
8. Requires the municipality to authorize at least one clerk position for the
municipal court and gives the municipal judge authority over the hiring, work
responsibilities, and firing of court personnel. The bill provides that the judge's
supervisory authority is a prohibited subject of collective bargaining for court
personnel who are not employed by a city of the first class and requires the clerk to
attend continuing education programs approved by the supreme court.
9. Requires the municipal judge to store all municipal court records in an
appropriate facility designated by the municipality.
10. Requires a municipal judge to wear a black robe while presiding in a
municipal court and prohibits the clerk from wearing anything that implies or
indicates he or she is a law enforcement employee.
11. Prohibits the municipality from locating the municipal court or the court
personnel within the municipal police department and gives the judge the authority
to establish court hours, while requiring the municipality to provide an adequate
courtroom for the municipal court.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
Passed 5–0 Jan 13, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 13, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0
Passed 12–0 Mar 16, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor, Risser, Erpenbach and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Seidel, Parisi, Pope-Roberts, Turner, Tauchen, Pasch, Staskunas, Lothian, Berceau, Danou and Townsend
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Nov 17, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 1, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 12, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 13, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Jan 13, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 13, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senator Miller added as a coauthor
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Seidel
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Kessler
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Parisi
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 11, Noes 1
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 11, Noes 1
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 12:01 P.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendments 1 and 3 adopted
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Assembly amendment 1 concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Assembly amendment 3 concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-28-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 18, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 402
- May 20, 2010 · Senate
Published 6-1-2010