Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 389

Licensing sign language interpreters, creating an evidentiary privilege for communications with those interpreters, creating a Sign Language Interpreter Council, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty

Topics: Deaf and hearing impaired, Privacy, Regulation and Licensing, Department of, Reorganization of state government

Became law

The governor signed it on May 14, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 9, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 72 to 26

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 360

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2010: “Published 5-27-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under this bill, no person may provide, for compensation, sign language interpretation services for a deaf or hard of hearing client unless the person holds a license granted by the Department of Regulation and Licensing (DRL). The bill exempts all of the following from the licensure requirement: 1) a person interpreting in a court proceeding, if the person is certified by the Wisconsin Supreme Court; 2) a person interpreting at a school or school-sponsored event, if the person is certified by the Department of Public Instruction; 3) a person interpreting at a religious service or religious function; 4) a support service provider facilitating communication between an interpreter and an individual who is deaf or hard of hearing; and 5) a person interpreting in the course of employment during an emergency, for up to 24 hours.

The bill creates two types of licenses, renewable and restricted. An applicant for a renewable license must have received an associate degree in sign language interpretation or completed an education and training program in such interpretation and must have a certification from a private body specified in the bill, except that the bill does not require the degree or completion of the training program if the applicant is deaf or hard of hearing. An applicant for a restricted license, which may be renewed only twice, must have received an associate degree or completed an education and training program, must have received a specified score on an examination administered by the Department of Health Services, must have passed a written examination administered by a specified private body, and must be a student or associate member of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, Inc. An applicant for a restricted license who is deaf or hard of hearing must have completed a lesser level of training, including at least 40 hours of mentoring under a nationally certified interpreter, must be a student or associate member of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, Inc., and must have a high school diploma or an equivalent, but such an applicant, once licensed, may provide interpretation services only under the supervision of an interpreter who holds a renewable license.

Read the full summary

The bill also creates a nine-member Sign Language Interpreter Council (council), which generally advises DRL regarding the practice of sign language interpreters. The council may grant a temporary exemption from the licensure requirement, and must make recommendations to DRL regarding a code of ethics for interpreters. The bill requires DRL to promulgate rules establishing a code of ethics for interpreters and authorizes DRL to conduct disciplinary proceedings against interpreters.

Under the bill, a licensed interpreter may not disclose any aspect of confidential communication facilitated by the interpreter, unless all parties to the communication consent and a court determines that disclosure is necessary for the proper administration of justice.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 27, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 27 to 5 · Feb 23, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 27, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 2 · Apr 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 72 to 26 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 26”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 14, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 360.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too, 72 to 26.

  5. Apr 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 2.

  7. Mar 11, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Mar 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Feb 24, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.

  10. Feb 24, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  11. Feb 23, 2010

    The Senate passed it.

  12. Jan 27, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  13. Jan 20, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jan 13, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  15. Dec 4, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Nov 19, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Nov 9, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  18. Nov 9, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kedzie, Lazich and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Lothian and Townsend

  2. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Nov 19, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 4, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 22, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Olsen

  12. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 27, Noes 5

  14. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform

  20. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  21. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  22. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren

  23. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Nygren

  24. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  25. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2

  26. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  27. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 by committee on Rules

  28. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  29. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  31. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 26

  32. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  34. May 4, 2010 · Senate

    LRB correction

  35. May 4, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-4-2010

  36. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  37. May 14, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 360

  38. May 17, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-27-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote