Senate Bill 389
Licensing sign language interpreters, creating an evidentiary privilege for communications with those interpreters, creating a Sign Language Interpreter Council, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty
Topics: Deaf and hearing impaired, Privacy, Regulation and Licensing, Department of, Reorganization of state government
Became law
The governor signed it on May 14, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 9, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 23, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 72 to 26
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 360
Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2010: “Published 5-27-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under this bill, no person may provide, for compensation, sign language interpretation services for a deaf or hard of hearing client unless the person holds a license granted by the Department of Regulation and Licensing (DRL). The bill exempts all of the following from the licensure requirement: 1) a person interpreting in a court proceeding, if the person is certified by the Wisconsin Supreme Court; 2) a person interpreting at a school or school-sponsored event, if the person is certified by the Department of Public Instruction; 3) a person interpreting at a religious service or religious function; 4) a support service provider facilitating communication between an interpreter and an individual who is deaf or hard of hearing; and 5) a person interpreting in the course of employment during an emergency, for up to 24 hours.
The bill creates two types of licenses, renewable and restricted. An applicant for a renewable license must have received an associate degree in sign language interpretation or completed an education and training program in such interpretation and must have a certification from a private body specified in the bill, except that the bill does not require the degree or completion of the training program if the applicant is deaf or hard of hearing. An applicant for a restricted license, which may be renewed only twice, must have received an associate degree or completed an education and training program, must have received a specified score on an examination administered by the Department of Health Services, must have passed a written examination administered by a specified private body, and must be a student or associate member of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, Inc. An applicant for a restricted license who is deaf or hard of hearing must have completed a lesser level of training, including at least 40 hours of mentoring under a nationally certified interpreter, must be a student or associate member of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, Inc., and must have a high school diploma or an equivalent, but such an applicant, once licensed, may provide interpretation services only under the supervision of an interpreter who holds a renewable license.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill also creates a nine-member Sign Language Interpreter Council (council), which generally advises DRL regarding the practice of sign language interpreters. The council may grant a temporary exemption from the licensure requirement, and must make recommendations to DRL regarding a code of ethics for interpreters. The bill requires DRL to promulgate rules establishing a code of ethics for interpreters and authorizes DRL to conduct disciplinary proceedings against interpreters.
Under the bill, a licensed interpreter may not disclose any aspect of confidential communication facilitated by the interpreter, unless all parties to the communication consent and a court determines that disclosure is necessary for the proper administration of justice.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 6 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- Mary Lazich · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (3)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Thomas Lothian · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 27, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 27 to 5 · Feb 23, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 27, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote to recommend it
Passed, 10 to 2 · Apr 2, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 72 to 26 · Apr 20, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 26”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 17, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 14, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 360.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The Assembly passed it too, 72 to 26.
-
Apr 2, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 2, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 2.
-
Mar 11, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 3, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 24, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.
-
Feb 24, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 23, 2010
The Senate passed it.
-
Jan 27, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Jan 20, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 13, 2010
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Dec 4, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 19, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 9, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.
-
Nov 9, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 9, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kedzie, Lazich and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Lothian and Townsend
- Nov 9, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Nov 19, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 4, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 13, 2010 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor
- Jan 20, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 22, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Olsen
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 27, Noes 5
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Nygren
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2
- Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 26
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 4, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction
- May 4, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-4-2010
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 14, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 360
- May 17, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-27-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote