Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 391

Expenditure of $30,000 from moneys appropriated to the Department of Natural Resources in payment of a claim against the state made by Stillmunkes, Inc

Topics: Claims, Natural Resources, Department of: Administration, Stillmunkes, Inc.

Became law

The governor signed it on May 14, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 9, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 22 to 11

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 22, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 353

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2010: “Published 5-27-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill directs expenditure of $30,000 from moneys appropriated to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for the current fiscal biennium for wild turkey population development, management, preservation, restoration, and maintenance in payment of a claim against DNR made by Stillmunkes, Inc. The claimant contracted to perform brush removal and forestry services at the Yellowstone Wildlife Area in 2008. DNR issued the claimant a purchase order in the amount of $20,800 for work to be completed by May 31, 2008. The purchase order stated that this amount was an estimate and the actual amount to be paid to the claimant would be based upon the actual amount of authorized services delivered.

The claimant states that it encountered unforeseen weather conditions and was forced to remove larger brush and logs than DNR represented and that it obtained oral approval of DNR to work beyond the completion date and to perform additional work. DNR recommended denial of the claim. DNR states that it approved the claimant's request to work beyond the completion date but did not approve any work in an amount exceeding the amount estimated in the purchase order and the claimant did not submit proof that additional work beyond the amount estimated in the purchase order was performed. The claimant claimed $76,050, representing the difference between the value of the amount of work it states was performed and the amount paid by DNR ($20,800). The claims board recommended payment of this claim in the reduced amount of $30,000 based upon equitable principles (see Senate Journal , p. 325).

Who's behind it

Dave Hansen, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

  • Sherman

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 0 · Feb 5, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 4 · Mar 17, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 22 to 11 · Apr 13, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 22, Noes 11”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 14, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 353.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 22 to 11.

  8. Mar 17, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 4.

  9. Feb 10, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  10. Feb 5, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.

  11. Jan 20, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Nov 23, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Nov 9, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  14. Nov 9, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Hansen;Cosponsored by Representative Sherman

  2. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Nov 23, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 4, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 5, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  7. Feb 5, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  9. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4

  11. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 22, Noes 11

  17. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:31 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  21. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Apr 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-27-2010

  28. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  29. May 14, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 353

  30. May 17, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-27-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote