Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
psychological evaluations for law enforcement officers, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Law Enforcement Standards Board (board) establishes
minimum qualification standards for law enforcement officers. The board may
establish, in addition to education and training standards, qualification standards
relating to the competence and reliability of a person to assume and discharge the
responsibilities of a law enforcement officer.
This bill provides that a candidate for a full-time law enforcement or tribal law
enforcement officer position must submit to a psychological evaluation before being
appointed as a full-time law enforcement or tribal law enforcement officer. This
evaluation requirement applies to law enforcement or tribal law enforcement officers
appointed on or after January 1, 2010. The bill also requires local law enforcement
agencies, and state agencies that employ law enforcement officers, to review the
psychological evaluation of a candidate for a law enforcement officer position before
appointing the individual as a full-time law enforcement officer.
Current law permits closure of access to public records concerning
psychological evaluations under some circumstances. This bill specifies that all of
the psychological evaluations provided for under the bill are confidential and not
subject to inspection or copying under the public records access law.
The bill requires the board to promulgate rules for the content of a required
psychological evaluation for full-time law enforcement and tribal law enforcement
officers. The bill also requires the board to submit a report to the legislature by April
1, 2011, that evaluates the effect of the requirement for psychological evaluations for
law enforcement officers, makes a recommendation as to whether psychological
evaluations should be required for part-time or limited term law enforcement and
tribal law enforcement officers, and makes a recommendation as to whether
psychological evaluations should be required for officers appointed to serve on a
special weapons and tactics unit. Finally, the bill makes the requirement for
psychological evaluations for law enforcement officers a prohibited subject of
bargaining under the State Employment Labor Relations Act.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Jan 19, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 18, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Hansen, Holperin, A. Lasee, Coggs, Schultz and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Hraychuck, Bies, Danou, Gunderson, Young, Zepnick, Sinicki, Vruwink, Brooks, Cullen, Toles, Benedict, Berceau, Townsend, Ripp and Ziegelbauer
- Nov 18, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Dec 4, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 10, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 10, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 16, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 12, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 12, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Jan 20, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Hansen
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Hansen
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1