Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
authorizing two or more cities, villages, towns, or counties, or a combination of such political subdivisions, to create a commission to issue conduit revenue bonds and exercise eminent domain authority and exempting from taxation interest on such bonds.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill authorizes two or more political subdivisions to enter into an
agreement to create a commission to issue a type of municipal bonds referred to as
conduit bonds. A commission is created using the current law procedures for
intergovernmental or interstate cooperation agreements. Generally, conduit bonds
(bonds) are bonds issued by a unit of government under which the proceeds of the
bond sale are transferred to a private entity (the borrower), who must be "qualified"
under federal law. The borrower uses the proceeds to finance a project that has a
public benefit as authorized under state or federal law. In effect, the unit of
government serves as a conduit between the borrower and the bond purchaser.
Generally, the borrower pays a lower interest rate on the bond proceeds than it would
have paid if it had borrowed the money on the open market because the bonds issued
by a unit of government may be exempt from federal or state taxation.
Under this arrangement, the borrower is solely responsible to repay the bonds
and interest on the bonds from revenue generated by the project financed by the bond
sale. Security for the bonds is supported by collateral or revenues of the borrower
who receives the proceeds from the bond sale. Collateral for the bonds may be a
building, equipment, or a revenue stream generated by the borrower's construction
or remodeling of a project. The borrower, not the unit of government that issues the
bonds, is responsible for all debt service payments to the bondholders. And the
borrower, not the unit of government that issues the bonds, is liable to the
bondholders if the bonds are not paid off.
A commission created as authorized under the bill is a unit of government and
a body corporate and politic that is completely separate from the creating political
subdivisions and from the state. The bill defines political subdivision to mean any
city, village, town, or county in this state or any city, village, town, county, district,
authority, agency, commission, or similar governmental entity in another state. A
political subdivision that is a party to an agreement is considered to be a member of
a commission. Before an agreement may take effect, it must be approved by the
attorney general.
A commission is governed, under the bill, by a board and the board members
are appointed under the terms of the agreement creating the commission. The
agreement may also provide for an additional political subdivision to become a
member of a commission, or for a member to withdraw from a commission. At all
times, however, at least one member of a commission must be a political subdivision
that is located in this state.
Under the bill, a commission is granted all of the powers that are necessary or
convenient to carry out the purposes described in the bill. Primarily, a commission
is authorized to issue bonds or refunding bonds to finance or refinance a project,
including funding a reserve fund or capitalized interest, payment of costs of issuance
and other costs related to the financing or refinancing, and to enter into agreements
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 26, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
Passed 32–0 Mar 4, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Mar 29, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 98, Noes 0
Passed 98–0 Apr 13, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Assembly amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0
Passed 32–0 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 18, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Plale, Hopper, Darling, Taylor, Schultz, Hansen and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Seidel, Hilgenberg, Dexter, Fields, Berceau, Jorgensen, Petrowski, Smith, Staskunas, Benedict, Hintz and Hraychuck
- Nov 18, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions
- Dec 10, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 14, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 25, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions and rereferred to committee on Economic Development, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)
- Feb 8, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Kreitlow
- Feb 10, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 10, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Kreitlow
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Mar 22, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Seidel
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 98, Noes 0
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Assembly amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-20-2010
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-21-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 205
- Apr 26, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-5-2010