Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 399

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

authorizing two or more cities, villages, towns, or counties, or a combination of such political subdivisions, to create a commission to issue conduit revenue bonds and exercise eminent domain authority and exempting from taxation interest on such bonds.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill authorizes two or more political subdivisions to enter into an

agreement to create a commission to issue a type of municipal bonds referred to as

conduit bonds. A commission is created using the current law procedures for

intergovernmental or interstate cooperation agreements. Generally, conduit bonds

(bonds) are bonds issued by a unit of government under which the proceeds of the

bond sale are transferred to a private entity (the borrower), who must be "qualified"

under federal law. The borrower uses the proceeds to finance a project that has a

public benefit as authorized under state or federal law. In effect, the unit of

government serves as a conduit between the borrower and the bond purchaser.

Generally, the borrower pays a lower interest rate on the bond proceeds than it would

have paid if it had borrowed the money on the open market because the bonds issued

by a unit of government may be exempt from federal or state taxation.

Under this arrangement, the borrower is solely responsible to repay the bonds

and interest on the bonds from revenue generated by the project financed by the bond

sale. Security for the bonds is supported by collateral or revenues of the borrower

who receives the proceeds from the bond sale. Collateral for the bonds may be a

building, equipment, or a revenue stream generated by the borrower's construction

or remodeling of a project. The borrower, not the unit of government that issues the

bonds, is responsible for all debt service payments to the bondholders. And the

borrower, not the unit of government that issues the bonds, is liable to the

bondholders if the bonds are not paid off.

A commission created as authorized under the bill is a unit of government and

a body corporate and politic that is completely separate from the creating political

subdivisions and from the state. The bill defines political subdivision to mean any

city, village, town, or county in this state or any city, village, town, county, district,

authority, agency, commission, or similar governmental entity in another state. A

political subdivision that is a party to an agreement is considered to be a member of

a commission. Before an agreement may take effect, it must be approved by the

attorney general.

A commission is governed, under the bill, by a board and the board members

are appointed under the terms of the agreement creating the commission. The

agreement may also provide for an additional political subdivision to become a

member of a commission, or for a member to withdraw from a commission. At all

times, however, at least one member of a commission must be a political subdivision

that is located in this state.

Under the bill, a commission is granted all of the powers that are necessary or

convenient to carry out the purposes described in the bill. Primarily, a commission

is authorized to issue bonds or refunding bonds to finance or refinance a project,

including funding a reserve fund or capitalized interest, payment of costs of issuance

and other costs related to the financing or refinancing, and to enter into agreements

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Darling (R) , Hansen (D) , Hopper (R) , Kreitlow (D) , Olsen (R) , Plale (D) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D)

13 cosponsors

Benedict (D) , Berceau (D) , Dexter (D) , Fields (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hintz (D) , Hraychuck (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Petrowski (R) , Seidel (D) , Smith (D) , Staskunas (D) , Vinehout (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Feb 26, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

Passed 32–0 Mar 4, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Mar 29, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 98, Noes 0

Passed 98–0 Apr 13, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Assembly amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

Passed 32–0 Apr 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 18, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Plale, Hopper, Darling, Taylor, Schultz, Hansen and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Seidel, Hilgenberg, Dexter, Fields, Berceau, Jorgensen, Petrowski, Smith, Staskunas, Benedict, Hintz and Hraychuck

  2. Nov 18, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions

  3. Dec 10, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 14, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 25, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions and rereferred to committee on Economic Development, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)

  7. Feb 8, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Kreitlow

  8. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  10. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor

  11. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Kreitlow

  12. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  13. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  14. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  15. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  17. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  18. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  19. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  21. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  24. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  26. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  27. Mar 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Seidel

  28. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  29. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  30. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  31. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  32. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 by committee on Rules

  33. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  34. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  35. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  36. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  37. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 98, Noes 0

  38. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  39. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  40. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  41. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  42. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Assembly amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  43. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  44. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)

  45. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-20-2010

  46. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-21-2010

  47. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 205

  48. Apr 26, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-5-2010