Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 407

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

eligibility for academic excellence higher education scholarships.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB) administers

the Academic Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program under which

HEAB awards scholarships to certain designated scholars who enroll, on a full-time

basis, in a public or private institution of higher education in this state that is

participating in the program. Currently, those scholarships may be awarded to the

senior with the highest grade point average from each high school in this state

enrolling at least 80 but less than 500 pupils, to the two seniors with the two highest

grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 500 but less

than 1,000 pupils, to the three seniors with the three highest grade point averages

from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,000 but less than 1,500 pupils,

to the four seniors with the four highest grade point averages from each high school

in this state enrolling at least 1,500 but less than 2,000 pupils, to the five seniors with

the five highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at

least 2,000 but less than 2,500 pupils, and to the six seniors with the six highest grade

point averages from each high school in this state enrolling 2,500 or more pupils. In

addition, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade

point average from the school operated by the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and

Visually Impaired and the school operated by the Wisconsin Educational Services

Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing and not more than ten scholarships

statewide may be awarded to seniors with the highest grade point averages from

high schools enrolling less than 80 pupils.

Currently, if two or more seniors from a high school have the same grade point

average and are otherwise eligible for a scholarship, the applicable number of seniors

are designated as scholars according to written tie-breaking criteria as required by

HEAB by rule and the remaining seniors with the same grade point average are

certified as alternates, who may be awarded a scholarship if a designated scholar

does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education. In the case of a high

school that weights different courses differently to determine a pupil's grade point

average, a senior with the next highest grade point average may also be certified as

a scholar if the senior who is designated as a scholar does not enroll in a participating

institution of higher education and there is no other senior with the same grade point

average as the designated scholar.

This bill permits those seniors with the next highest grade point average, but

not less than 3.800 or the equivalent, to be certified as alternates and permits such

an alternate to receive a scholarship if a senior who is designated as a scholar or an

alternate with the same grade point average does not enroll in a participating

institution of higher education in all cases, regardless of how the high school weights

its courses. The bill also changes the date by which a school must designate a scholar

from February 15 to February 25 of a school year.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Hansen (D) , Miller (D) , Taylor (D)

9 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Hebl (D) , LeMahieu (R) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Smith (D) , Townsend (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 24, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

Passed 16–0 Mar 17, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 9

Passed 24–9 Apr 13, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 20, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Miller, Taylor and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Smith, Pope-Roberts, Hebl, A. Ott, Townsend, Bies, Brooks and LeMahieu

  2. Nov 20, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture and Higher Education

  3. Dec 1, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  9. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  11. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  12. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  13. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  14. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  15. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  16. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Decker

  17. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  18. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 adopted

  20. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  21. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  22. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 9

  25. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  27. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  28. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 by committee on Rules

  29. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  30. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  31. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  32. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  33. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  34. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  35. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  36. May 7, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-7-2010

  37. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  38. May 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 306

  39. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-26-2010