Senate Bill 407
Eligibility for academic excellence higher education scholarships
Topics: Higher Educational Aids Board, Scholarships and loans, School
Became law
The governor signed it on May 12, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 20, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 20, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 306
Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB) administers the Academic Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program under which HEAB awards scholarships to certain designated scholars who enroll, on a full-time basis, in a public or private institution of higher education in this state that is participating in the program. Currently, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade point average from each high school in this state enrolling at least 80 but less than 500 pupils, to the two seniors with the two highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 500 but less than 1,000 pupils, to the three seniors with the three highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,000 but less than 1,500 pupils, to the four seniors with the four highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,500 but less than 2,000 pupils, to the five seniors with the five highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 2,000 but less than 2,500 pupils, and to the six seniors with the six highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling 2,500 or more pupils. In addition, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade point average from the school operated by the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the school operated by the Wisconsin Educational Services Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing and not more than ten scholarships statewide may be awarded to seniors with the highest grade point averages from high schools enrolling less than 80 pupils.
Currently, if two or more seniors from a high school have the same grade point average and are otherwise eligible for a scholarship, the applicable number of seniors are designated as scholars according to written tie-breaking criteria as required by HEAB by rule and the remaining seniors with the same grade point average are certified as alternates, who may be awarded a scholarship if a designated scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education. In the case of a high school that weights different courses differently to determine a pupil's grade point average, a senior with the next highest grade point average may also be certified as a scholar if the senior who is designated as a scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education and there is no other senior with the same grade point average as the designated scholar.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill permits those seniors with the next highest grade point average, but not less than 3.800 or the equivalent, to be certified as alternates and permits such an alternate to receive a scholarship if a senior who is designated as a scholar or an alternate with the same grade point average does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education in all cases, regardless of how the high school weights its courses. The bill also changes the date by which a school must designate a scholar from February 15 to February 25 of a school year.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Democrats.
9 more lawmakers .
See all 12 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (9)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 24, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 16 to 0 · Mar 17, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 24 to 9 · Apr 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 9”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 13, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 12, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 306.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Apr 14, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 14, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate passed it, 24 to 9.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 17, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.
-
Mar 17, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 17, 2010
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)
-
Mar 17, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 17, 2010
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)
-
Mar 3, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 24, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 10, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 1, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 20, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education.
-
Nov 20, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 20, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Miller, Taylor and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Smith, Pope-Roberts, Hebl, A. Ott, Townsend, Bies, Brooks and LeMahieu
- Nov 20, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture and Higher Education
- Dec 1, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 10, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Decker
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 9
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 7, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-7-2010
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 12, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 306
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-26-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote