Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 407

Eligibility for academic excellence higher education scholarships

Topics: Higher Educational Aids Board, Scholarships and loans, School

Became law

The governor signed it on May 12, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 20, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 306

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB) administers the Academic Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program under which HEAB awards scholarships to certain designated scholars who enroll, on a full-time basis, in a public or private institution of higher education in this state that is participating in the program. Currently, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade point average from each high school in this state enrolling at least 80 but less than 500 pupils, to the two seniors with the two highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 500 but less than 1,000 pupils, to the three seniors with the three highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,000 but less than 1,500 pupils, to the four seniors with the four highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,500 but less than 2,000 pupils, to the five seniors with the five highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 2,000 but less than 2,500 pupils, and to the six seniors with the six highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling 2,500 or more pupils. In addition, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade point average from the school operated by the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the school operated by the Wisconsin Educational Services Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing and not more than ten scholarships statewide may be awarded to seniors with the highest grade point averages from high schools enrolling less than 80 pupils.

Currently, if two or more seniors from a high school have the same grade point average and are otherwise eligible for a scholarship, the applicable number of seniors are designated as scholars according to written tie-breaking criteria as required by HEAB by rule and the remaining seniors with the same grade point average are certified as alternates, who may be awarded a scholarship if a designated scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education. In the case of a high school that weights different courses differently to determine a pupil's grade point average, a senior with the next highest grade point average may also be certified as a scholar if the senior who is designated as a scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education and there is no other senior with the same grade point average as the designated scholar.

Read the full summary

This bill permits those seniors with the next highest grade point average, but not less than 3.800 or the equivalent, to be certified as alternates and permits such an alternate to receive a scholarship if a senior who is designated as a scholar or an alternate with the same grade point average does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education in all cases, regardless of how the high school weights its courses. The bill also changes the date by which a school must designate a scholar from February 15 to February 25 of a school year.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 24, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 16 to 0 · Mar 17, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 24 to 9 · Apr 13, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 9”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 12, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 306.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Apr 14, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 14, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 24 to 9.

  8. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Mar 17, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.

  10. Mar 17, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Mar 17, 2010

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)

  12. Mar 17, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Mar 17, 2010

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)

  14. Mar 3, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  15. Feb 24, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  16. Feb 10, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Dec 1, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Nov 20, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education.

  19. Nov 20, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 20, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Miller, Taylor and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Smith, Pope-Roberts, Hebl, A. Ott, Townsend, Bies, Brooks and LeMahieu

  2. Nov 20, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture and Higher Education

  3. Dec 1, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  9. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  11. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  12. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  13. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  14. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  15. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Decker

  17. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  18. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 adopted

  20. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  21. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  22. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 9

  25. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  27. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  28. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 by committee on Rules

  29. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  30. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  31. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  32. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  33. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  34. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  35. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  36. May 7, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-7-2010

  37. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  38. May 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 306

  39. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-26-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote