Senate Bill 409
A postsecondary education tax credit for businesses; increasing annual limits on angel investment tax credits; awarding grants to the WiSys Technology Foundation, Inc.; business plan competitions and an emerging technology center in the University of Wisconsin System; rural outsourcing grants; requiring the Department of Commerce to award grants to a high-technology business development corporation and grants for converting manufacturing facilities; increasing funding for certain economic development programs; a pilot program providing microloans for the creation of new businesses; increasing funding for certain technical college training program grants; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making appropriations
Topics: Business, Children and Families, Department of, Commerce, Department of, Corporation, Corporation: Taxation, Energy conservation, Federal aid, Franchise: Taxation, Hospitals, Income tax: Credit, Industrial development, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Medical education, Ombudsman, Organization, Miscellaneous, Parochial and private educational institutions, Poor, Public assistance, Regional planning, Reorganization of state government, Reports, Rural planning, Small loan, Technical College System Board, Technical college, Trades and occupations, University of Wisconsin: La Crosse, University of Wisconsin: Regents, University of Wisconsin: School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin: Tuition, Veterinary medicine
Became law
The governor signed it on May 10, 2010. It's . Before signing, the governor struck some parts using Wisconsin's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 20, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 21, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 265
Latest entry in the official record, May 26, 2010: “Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Partial veto
Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill creates an income tax and franchise tax credit for businesses that pay tuition for an individual to attend a university, college, or technical college. Sole proprietorships, corporations, and insurers may claim the credit. Partnerships, limited liability companies, and tax-option corporations compute the credit but pass it on to the partners, members, and shareholders in proportion to their ownership interests. The credit is an amount equal to: 1) 25 percent of the tuition paid by a business for an individual to attend school, if the individual is enrolled in a course of instruction and is eligible for a grant from the Federal Pell Grant Program; and 2) 30 percent of the tuition paid by a business for an individual to attend school, if the individual is enrolled in a course of instruction that relates to a projected worker shortage in this state and is eligible for a grant from the Federal Pell Grant Program.
The taxpayer claims the total amount of the tuition paid for the individual for the taxable year in which the individual graduates from the course of instruction. If the credit claimed by a business exceeds the business's tax liability, the state will not issue a refund check, but the business may carry forward any remaining credit to subsequent taxable years.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, an individual may claim an income tax credit in each taxable year for two years, beginning with the taxable year certified by the Department of Commerce (Commerce), in an amount equal to 12.5 percent of the individual's bona fide angel investment in a new business venture. The total amount of all bona fide angel investment credits that may be claimed in a calendar year beginning after 2007 but before 2011 is $5,500,000 and the total amount that may be claimed in any calendar year beginning after 2010 is $18,000,000. Under the bill, the total amount of all bona fide angel investment credits that may be claimed in 2010 is $6,500,000, and the total amount that may be claimed in a calendar year beginning after 2010 is $20,000,000.
Under current law, a taxpayer may claim an early stage seed investment tax credit for 25 percent of the amount that the taxpayer pays to a fund manager that the fund manager invests with certain businesses that are certified by Commerce to receive investments. The total amount of all early stage seed investment credits that may be claimed in a calendar year beginning after 2007 but before 2011 is $6,000,000 and the total amount that may be claimed in any calendar year beginning after 2010 is $18,500,000. Under the bill, the total amount of all early stage seed investment credits that may be claimed in 2010 is $8,000,000, and the total amount that may be claimed in any calendar year beginning after 2010 is $20,500,000 The bill directs the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin (UW) System to award to the WiSys Technology Foundation, Inc. (foundation), grants for the Wisconsin Small Company Advancement program to provide intellectual property management services to UW System two-year and four-year schools, other than the UW-Madison and the UW-Milwaukee. Each grant must be for $250,000, but the Board of Regents may award a grant only if the foundation shows that it has secured matching funds for the program from sources other than the state. The bill provides for a maximum number of eight grants.
The bill appropriates $125,000 annually to the Board of Regents of the UW System to support a business plan competition program existing on the effective date of bill at two-year and four-year schools, except for the UW-Madison, that makes entrepreneurial expertise available to students and that has ties to campus-based business plan contests and national organizations that foster student entrepreneurism. The bill also appropriates $400,000 during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium to the Board of Regents to develop an emerging technology center at the UW-La Crosse. The bill prohibits the Board of Regents from spending moneys under either appropriation unless it receives matching funds from private contributions.
Beginning in the 2010-11 school year, the bill requires the Technical College System Board (system board) to award at least $1,500,000 annually to technical college district boards for advanced manufacturing skills training. Under current law, the system board must award at least $1,000,000 annually for such training, with the same priority. The bill authorizes Commerce to award grants in the 2009-11 fiscal biennium to businesses for outsourcing work to rural municipalities in this state. Grants under the bill are funded by repayments of grants and loans under a number of economic development programs. Under the bill, Commerce must require grantees to obtain funding from sources other than the state in an amount at least equal to the amount of the grant. The total amount of grants awarded under the bill may not exceed $500,000.
Under current law, Commerce assists in maintaining a high-technology business development corporation, for promoting and supporting the creation, development, and retention of science-based and technology-based businesses in the state.
The bill requires Commerce to award to the corporation an annual grant of $100,000 for employing a grant writer to assist businesses to apply for certain federal small business grants, beginning in fiscal year 2010-11. The bill also requires Commerce to award the corporation a one-time grant of $100,000 in fiscal year 2010-11 for an economic modeling database for use by regional economic development entities. The bill increases a current appropriation of general purpose revenue to Commerce by $200,000 in fiscal year 2010-11 to fund the grants.
The Wisconsin Development Fund (development fund) is a biennial appropriation of general purpose revenues to Commerce. Currently, the development fund provides moneys for grants to Center for Advanced Technology and Innovation; for technology commercialization grants and loans; for grants and loans to support capital financing, worker training, entrepreneurial development, and other economic development projects; and for reimbursements under the Wisconsin trade project program.
The bill increases the appropriation by $3,000,000 for the 2009-11 fiscal biennium. The bill also requires Commerce to award grants from the development fund in fiscal year 2010-11 to businesses for converting existing unutilized or underutilized manufacturing facilities to the production of renewable energy or the manufacturing of equipment used in the production of renewable energy. The total amount of grants awarded may not exceed $2,000,000.
This bill also establishes a technology transfer grant and loan program in Commerce. Under the program, Commerce may award a grant or loan of up to $100,000 to a research institution to pay for research and development activities that will result in the creation or retention of jobs in this state or that will improve the competitive position of a business in this state by improving the innovativeness of the business. The bill defines a "research institution" as any of the following located in this state: an accredited college; university; school of medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, medicine and public health, public health, or health professionals; a center for health sciences; or a hospital in which research is conducted. Grants and loans under the program are funded from existing economic development programs, including the Forward Innovation Fund and the development fund.
The bill directs Commerce to establish a pilot program of making loans of not more than $25,000 at nominal interest rates for the creation of new businesses.
Under the bill, Commerce must designate two areas of the state, one urban and one rural, that are affected by high unemployment and must make the loans only to residents of the areas. Commerce must partner with federal, state, regional, and local economic development entities to provide business training for applicants and borrowers. The bill appropriates $500,000 to Commerce in fiscal 2010-11 for the loans. Commerce may not make loans under the program after July 31, 2013.
Current law requires Commerce to award a $70,000 grant to Pleasant Prairie Technology Incubator Center no later than July 31, 2011. The bill requires Commerce to award the grant no later than 30 days after the effective date of the bill.
In addition, the bill increases funding for Commerce by $75,000 in fiscal 2010-11 in order to fund a position for Commerce's Regulatory Ombudsman Center.
Who's behind it
18 senators are its . All 18 are Democrats.
10 more lawmakers .
See all 28 names Hide the names
Authors (18)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Russell Decker · Democrat, Senate
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (10)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- David Cullen · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristen Dexter · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Marlin Schneider · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 7 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic Development vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Dec 17, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 4, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 13 to 0 · Jan 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 32 to 1 · Jan 21, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Jobs vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 5 · Apr 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 6 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 7, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 88 to 9 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 88, Noes 9”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 15 · Apr 20, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 26, 2010
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
May 24, 2010
“Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)” (the official wording)
-
May 11, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 10, 2010
The governor signed it after striking some parts with a partial veto. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 265.
-
May 6, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 20, 2010
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Apr 16, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it too, 88 to 9.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-15-2010” (the official wording)
-
Apr 13, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 2.
-
Feb 3, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 26, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business.
-
Jan 25, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 21, 2010
The Senate passed it, 32 to 1.
-
Jan 21, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jan 15, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 0.
-
Jan 15, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 15, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 15, 2010
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)
-
Jan 4, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Dec 18, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 17, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Dec 17, 2009
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Dec 17, 2009
“Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development” (the official wording)
-
Dec 10, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 10, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 20, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development.
-
Nov 20, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 20, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lassa, Kreitlow, Sullivan, Lehman, Vinehout, Jauch, Hansen, Holperin, Miller, Robson, Erpenbach, Risser, Plale, Decker, Taylor, Wirch, Carpenter and Coggs;Cosponsored by Representatives Molepske Jr., Cullen, Zigmunt, Smith, Turner, Berceau, Zepnick, Vruwink, Dexter and Schneider
- Nov 20, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development
- Dec 10, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Dec 10, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 10, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 15, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Dec 17, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development
- Dec 17, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Dec 17, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Dec 17, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Dec 18, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 4, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 14, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-21-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 8, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 6 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 7, Noes 5
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 10, Noes 2
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 12:04 P.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-15-2010
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representative Vruwink
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 withdrawn and returned to author
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 88, Noes 9
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 6 adopted
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Assembly amendment 6 concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- May 3, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 6)
- May 3, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-3-2010
- May 6, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-6-2010
- May 10, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor with partial veto on 5-10-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 265
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-24-2010
- May 24, 2010 · Senate
Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)
- May 26, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Partial veto
Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Partial veto
Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote