Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 409

A postsecondary education tax credit for businesses; increasing annual limits on angel investment tax credits; awarding grants to the WiSys Technology Foundation, Inc.; business plan competitions and an emerging technology center in the University of Wisconsin System; rural outsourcing grants; requiring the Department of Commerce to award grants to a high-technology business development corporation and grants for converting manufacturing facilities; increasing funding for certain economic development programs; a pilot program providing microloans for the creation of new businesses; increasing funding for certain technical college training program grants; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making appropriations

Topics: Business, Children and Families, Department of, Commerce, Department of, Corporation, Corporation: Taxation, Energy conservation, Federal aid, Franchise: Taxation, Hospitals, Income tax: Credit, Industrial development, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Medical education, Ombudsman, Organization, Miscellaneous, Parochial and private educational institutions, Poor, Public assistance, Regional planning, Reorganization of state government, Reports, Rural planning, Small loan, Technical College System Board, Technical college, Trades and occupations, University of Wisconsin: La Crosse, University of Wisconsin: Regents, University of Wisconsin: School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin: Tuition, Veterinary medicine

Became law

The governor signed it on May 10, 2010. It's ⁠. Before signing, the governor struck some parts using Wisconsin's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 20, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 21, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 265

Latest entry in the official record, May 26, 2010: “Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

How the partial veto works

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates an income tax and franchise tax credit for businesses that pay tuition for an individual to attend a university, college, or technical college. Sole proprietorships, corporations, and insurers may claim the credit. Partnerships, limited liability companies, and tax-option corporations compute the credit but pass it on to the partners, members, and shareholders in proportion to their ownership interests. The credit is an amount equal to: 1) 25 percent of the tuition paid by a business for an individual to attend school, if the individual is enrolled in a course of instruction and is eligible for a grant from the Federal Pell Grant Program; and 2) 30 percent of the tuition paid by a business for an individual to attend school, if the individual is enrolled in a course of instruction that relates to a projected worker shortage in this state and is eligible for a grant from the Federal Pell Grant Program.

The taxpayer claims the total amount of the tuition paid for the individual for the taxable year in which the individual graduates from the course of instruction. If the credit claimed by a business exceeds the business's tax liability, the state will not issue a refund check, but the business may carry forward any remaining credit to subsequent taxable years.

Read the full summary

Under current law, an individual may claim an income tax credit in each taxable year for two years, beginning with the taxable year certified by the Department of Commerce (Commerce), in an amount equal to 12.5 percent of the individual's bona fide angel investment in a new business venture. The total amount of all bona fide angel investment credits that may be claimed in a calendar year beginning after 2007 but before 2011 is $5,500,000 and the total amount that may be claimed in any calendar year beginning after 2010 is $18,000,000. Under the bill, the total amount of all bona fide angel investment credits that may be claimed in 2010 is $6,500,000, and the total amount that may be claimed in a calendar year beginning after 2010 is $20,000,000.

Under current law, a taxpayer may claim an early stage seed investment tax credit for 25 percent of the amount that the taxpayer pays to a fund manager that the fund manager invests with certain businesses that are certified by Commerce to receive investments. The total amount of all early stage seed investment credits that may be claimed in a calendar year beginning after 2007 but before 2011 is $6,000,000 and the total amount that may be claimed in any calendar year beginning after 2010 is $18,500,000. Under the bill, the total amount of all early stage seed investment credits that may be claimed in 2010 is $8,000,000, and the total amount that may be claimed in any calendar year beginning after 2010 is $20,500,000 The bill directs the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin (UW) System to award to the WiSys Technology Foundation, Inc. (foundation), grants for the Wisconsin Small Company Advancement program to provide intellectual property management services to UW System two-year and four-year schools, other than the UW-Madison and the UW-Milwaukee. Each grant must be for $250,000, but the Board of Regents may award a grant only if the foundation shows that it has secured matching funds for the program from sources other than the state. The bill provides for a maximum number of eight grants.

The bill appropriates $125,000 annually to the Board of Regents of the UW System to support a business plan competition program existing on the effective date of bill at two-year and four-year schools, except for the UW-Madison, that makes entrepreneurial expertise available to students and that has ties to campus-based business plan contests and national organizations that foster student entrepreneurism. The bill also appropriates $400,000 during the 2009-11 fiscal biennium to the Board of Regents to develop an emerging technology center at the UW-La Crosse. The bill prohibits the Board of Regents from spending moneys under either appropriation unless it receives matching funds from private contributions.

Beginning in the 2010-11 school year, the bill requires the Technical College System Board (system board) to award at least $1,500,000 annually to technical college district boards for advanced manufacturing skills training. Under current law, the system board must award at least $1,000,000 annually for such training, with the same priority. The bill authorizes Commerce to award grants in the 2009-11 fiscal biennium to businesses for outsourcing work to rural municipalities in this state. Grants under the bill are funded by repayments of grants and loans under a number of economic development programs. Under the bill, Commerce must require grantees to obtain funding from sources other than the state in an amount at least equal to the amount of the grant. The total amount of grants awarded under the bill may not exceed $500,000.

Under current law, Commerce assists in maintaining a high-technology business development corporation, for promoting and supporting the creation, development, and retention of science-based and technology-based businesses in the state.

The bill requires Commerce to award to the corporation an annual grant of $100,000 for employing a grant writer to assist businesses to apply for certain federal small business grants, beginning in fiscal year 2010-11. The bill also requires Commerce to award the corporation a one-time grant of $100,000 in fiscal year 2010-11 for an economic modeling database for use by regional economic development entities. The bill increases a current appropriation of general purpose revenue to Commerce by $200,000 in fiscal year 2010-11 to fund the grants.

The Wisconsin Development Fund (development fund) is a biennial appropriation of general purpose revenues to Commerce. Currently, the development fund provides moneys for grants to Center for Advanced Technology and Innovation; for technology commercialization grants and loans; for grants and loans to support capital financing, worker training, entrepreneurial development, and other economic development projects; and for reimbursements under the Wisconsin trade project program.

The bill increases the appropriation by $3,000,000 for the 2009-11 fiscal biennium. The bill also requires Commerce to award grants from the development fund in fiscal year 2010-11 to businesses for converting existing unutilized or underutilized manufacturing facilities to the production of renewable energy or the manufacturing of equipment used in the production of renewable energy. The total amount of grants awarded may not exceed $2,000,000.

This bill also establishes a technology transfer grant and loan program in Commerce. Under the program, Commerce may award a grant or loan of up to $100,000 to a research institution to pay for research and development activities that will result in the creation or retention of jobs in this state or that will improve the competitive position of a business in this state by improving the innovativeness of the business. The bill defines a "research institution" as any of the following located in this state: an accredited college; university; school of medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, medicine and public health, public health, or health professionals; a center for health sciences; or a hospital in which research is conducted. Grants and loans under the program are funded from existing economic development programs, including the Forward Innovation Fund and the development fund.

The bill directs Commerce to establish a pilot program of making loans of not more than $25,000 at nominal interest rates for the creation of new businesses.

Under the bill, Commerce must designate two areas of the state, one urban and one rural, that are affected by high unemployment and must make the loans only to residents of the areas. Commerce must partner with federal, state, regional, and local economic development entities to provide business training for applicants and borrowers. The bill appropriates $500,000 to Commerce in fiscal 2010-11 for the loans. Commerce may not make loans under the program after July 31, 2013.

Current law requires Commerce to award a $70,000 grant to Pleasant Prairie Technology Incubator Center no later than July 31, 2011. The bill requires Commerce to award the grant no later than 30 days after the effective date of the bill.

In addition, the bill increases funding for Commerce by $75,000 in fiscal 2010-11 in order to fund a position for Commerce's Regulatory Ombudsman Center.

Who's behind it

18 senators are its ⁠. All 18 are Democrats.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 28 names

Authors (18)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Economic Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Dec 17, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 4, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Jan 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 1 · Jan 21, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Jobs vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 5 · Apr 13, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 6 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 7, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 88 to 9 · Apr 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 88, Noes 9”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 15 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 26, 2010

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. May 24, 2010

    “Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)” (the official wording)

  3. May 11, 2010

    The new law was published.

  4. May 10, 2010

    The governor signed it after striking some parts with a partial veto. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 265.

  5. May 6, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  6. Apr 20, 2010

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  7. Apr 16, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too, 88 to 9.

  9. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Apr 15, 2010

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-15-2010” (the official wording)

  11. Apr 13, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Apr 13, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 2.

  13. Feb 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jan 26, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business.

  15. Jan 25, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  16. Jan 21, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 1.

  17. Jan 21, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  18. Jan 15, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 0.

  19. Jan 15, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  20. Jan 15, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  21. Jan 15, 2010

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)

  22. Jan 4, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  23. Dec 18, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  24. Dec 17, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  25. Dec 17, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  26. Dec 17, 2009

    “Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development” (the official wording)

  27. Dec 10, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  28. Dec 10, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  29. Nov 20, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development.

  30. Nov 20, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 20, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lassa, Kreitlow, Sullivan, Lehman, Vinehout, Jauch, Hansen, Holperin, Miller, Robson, Erpenbach, Risser, Plale, Decker, Taylor, Wirch, Carpenter and Coggs;Cosponsored by Representatives Molepske Jr., Cullen, Zigmunt, Smith, Turner, Berceau, Zepnick, Vruwink, Dexter and Schneider

  2. Nov 20, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development

  3. Dec 10, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Dec 10, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 10, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Dec 15, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Dec 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development

  8. Dec 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Dec 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Dec 17, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Dec 18, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Jan 4, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  14. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  15. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  16. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  17. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  18. Jan 15, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  20. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  22. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  23. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  25. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1

  26. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  28. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business

  29. Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  30. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  31. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  32. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  33. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  34. Apr 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  35. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  36. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 6 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 7, Noes 5

  37. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 10, Noes 2

  38. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  39. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:04 P.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  40. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-15-2010

  41. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  42. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 adopted

  43. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representative Vruwink

  44. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 withdrawn and returned to author

  45. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  46. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  47. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 88, Noes 9

  48. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  49. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 6 adopted

  50. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  51. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  52. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Assembly amendment 6 concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  53. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  54. May 3, 2010 · Senate

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 6)

  55. May 3, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-3-2010

  56. May 6, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-6-2010

  57. May 10, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor with partial veto on 5-10-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 265

  58. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-24-2010

  59. May 24, 2010 · Senate

    Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)

  60. May 26, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote