Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 412

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

changing certain administrative procedures under the tax incremental financing program.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Currently, towns also have a limited ability to create a TID under

certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and

plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed

TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning

commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project

plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's

proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the

overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or

village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city

or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;

financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR

authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,

20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID

and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID

and the allocation period may be extended.

Under current law, a planning commission may adopt an amendment to a

project plan, which requires the approval of the common council or village board and

the same findings that current law requires for the creation of a TID. Current law

also authorizes the amendment of a project plan up to four times during a TID's

existence to change the district's boundaries by adding or subtracting territory.

Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or

village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of

taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not

exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village

(the "12 percent test"), subject to one exception. Under the exception, a city or village

may simultaneously create a new TID and subtract territory from an existing TID

without adopting a resolution containing the 12 percent test if the city or village

demonstrates to DOR that the value of the territory that is subtracted at least equals

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Erpenbach (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Holperin (D) , Miller (D) , Plale (D)

5 cosponsors

Berceau (D) , Brooks (R) , Dexter (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Jan 27, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

Passed 16–0 Mar 17, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1

Passed 32–1 Apr 13, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 2, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Holperin, Miller, Plale and Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Berceau, Brooks, Dexter and Zepnick

  2. Dec 2, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Jan 12, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Erpenbach

  4. Jan 13, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  8. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  11. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  12. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  13. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  14. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  15. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  17. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  18. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  19. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1

  22. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  24. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  25. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:18 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  26. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  27. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  29. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  30. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  32. Apr 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-26-2010

  33. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  34. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 312

  35. May 14, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-26-2010