Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 419

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

requiring the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to establish standards for products sold as honey, prohibiting the labeling as Wisconsin certified honey of a product that has not been determined to meet the standards, prohibiting the labeling as honey of a product that does not meet the standards, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer

Protection (DATCP) to promulgate rules that establish standards for products sold

as honey and standards for the testing by private laboratories of samples submitted

by persons who wish to sell honey produced in this state as Wisconsin certified honey.

The standards for honey must be consistent with the standard for honey under the

Codex Alimentarius of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

and the World Health Organization.

The bill prohibits labeling a product as Wisconsin certified honey or implying

that a product is Wisconsin certified honey, unless the product has been determined

by testing to meet the standards established by DATCP, DATCP has approved a

summary of the testing, and the product was produced in this state. Under the bill,

DATCP investigates violations of this prohibition and may bring an action to enjoin

violations.

The bill also prohibits labeling a product as honey or implying that a product

is honey, unless the product meets the standards established by DATCP. Any person

who suffers damages as a result of a violation of this prohibition may bring an action

against the violator to recover the amount of the person's damages or $1,000,

whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney fees.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Lehman (D) , Miller (D) , Schultz (R) , Vinehout (D)

23 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , A. Williams (D) , Ballweg (R) , Barca (D) , Brooks (R) , Clark (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Kerkman (R) , Knodl (R) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Ripp (R) , Roys (D) , Schneider (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Tauchen (R) , Turner (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wirch (D) , Young (D) , Zigmunt (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 13, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 3, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Vinehout, Lehman, Miller and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Garthwaite, Vruwink, Barca, Ballweg, Brooks, Clark, Hilgenberg, Kerkman, Knodl, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Pasch, Pope-Roberts, Ripp, Roys, Schneider, Steinbrink, Tauchen, Turner, A. Williams, Young and Zigmunt

  2. Dec 3, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture and Higher Education

  3. Dec 7, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 21, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Wirch added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 7, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 13, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 13, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture and Higher Education, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Jan 13, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Laid on the table

  11. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1