Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 43

The scope of regulated activity under the campaign finance law

Topics: Elections: Campaign expense, Newspaper and magazine, Political parties, Television

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Jan 19, 2010, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 5, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 19, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, individuals who accept contributions, organizations that make or accept contributions, and individuals who or organizations that incur obligations or make disbursements for the purpose of influencing an election for state or local office are generally required to register with the appropriate filing officer and to file financial reports with that officer, regardless of whether they act in conjunction with or independently of any candidate who is supported or opposed.

With certain exceptions, this bill imposes registration and reporting requirements, in addition, upon any individual who and organization that, within 60 days of an election and by means of communications media, makes any communication that includes a reference to a candidate at that election, an office to be filled at that election, or a political party. The bill also requires an individual who or organization that becomes subject to a registration requirement by making such a communication to report, upon registration, the information that would have been required to be reported if the individual or organization had been registered with respect to any obligation incurred or disbursement made for the purpose of making such a communication prior to registration. The bill, however, does not require registration and reporting if the communication is made by a corporation, cooperative, or nonpolitical voluntary association and is limited to the corporation's, cooperative's, or association's members, shareholders, or subscribers. In addition, the bill exempts from registration and reporting the cost of making a communication that 1) does not mention an election, candidacy, opposing candidate, political party, or voting by the general public; and 2) does not take a position on a candidate's or officeholder's character, qualifications, or fitness for office, and either a) focuses on a legislative or executive matter or issue and urges a candidate to take a particular position or action with respect to the matter or issue or urges the public to contact a candidate with respect to the matter or issue, or b) proposes a commercial transaction, such as the purchase of a book, video, or other product or service, unless the communication is susceptible of no reasonable interpretation other than as an appeal to vote for or against a candidate for state or local office whose name is certified to appear on the ballot at the election.

Read the full summary

The change in the scope of reportable activity under the bill also applies to contribution and disbursement (spending) limitations and restrictions by causing reportable "contributions," "obligations," and "disbursements" to include the cost of all reportable communications.

Violators of registration and reporting requirements are subject to a forfeiture (civil penalty) of not more than $500 for each violation. In addition, any person who is delinquent in filing a report is subject to a forfeiture of not more than $50 or 1 percent of the annual salary of the office for which a candidate is being supported or opposed, whichever is greater, for each day of delinquency. Intentional violators of the registration requirements and persons who intentionally file false reports or statements may be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both, if the violation does not exceed $100 in amount or value, and may be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than three years and six months, or both, if the violation exceeds $100 in amount or value.

Who's behind it

12 senators are its ⁠. 9 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

19 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 31 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (19)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 1 · Sep 17, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 26 to 7 · Jan 19, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 26, Noes 7”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 15, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Jan 20, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  4. Jan 19, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Jan 19, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 26 to 7.

  6. Jan 19, 2010

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  7. Jan 19, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Sep 17, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  9. Sep 17, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1” (the official wording)

  10. May 27, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Feb 5, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  12. Feb 5, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 5, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Kreitlow, Ellis, Vinehout, Hansen, Risser, Lehman, Holperin, Harsdorf, Carpenter, Cowles and Robson;Cosponsored by Representatives Dexter, Hebl, Cullen, Zigmunt, Sherman, Barca, Hintz, Black, Hilgenberg, Mason, Toles, Hixson, Pope-Roberts, Pocan, Kaufert and Berceau

  2. Feb 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. May 22, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Erpenbach

  4. May 27, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 15, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  7. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  10. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  12. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Miller added as a coauthor

  15. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Sullivan added as a coauthor

  16. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 26, Noes 7

  17. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a coauthor

  18. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  21. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:34 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  22. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote