Senate Bill 440
Waiving certain federal bond limitations allocated to cities and counties and requiring the Department of Commerce to develop a system for reallocating the bond limitations to other state and local units of government
Topics: Bonds: County, Bonds: Municipal, Commerce, Department of, County, Federal aid, Housing, Intrastate relations, Municipality
Became law
The governor signed it on Feb 5, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 23, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 28, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 90 to 6
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 112
Latest entry in the official record, Feb 9, 2010: “Published 2-18-2010.”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current federal law, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, authorizes certain local governments to issue several different types of tax-exempt bonds, including recovery zone facility bonds (bonds). The amount of bonds that may be issued is limited. Federal law allocates to counties and to cities with a population of at least 100,000 (local units) the limited amount of bonds that may be issued.
Federal law also authorizes local units to waive their allocation, in which case the state in which the local units are located may reallocate the allocation to other units of government in that state.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill waives the allocation to local units in this state and requires the Department of Commerce (DOC) to develop a system to reallocate the allocation. The bill prohibits DOC from reallocating an allocation of the limitation related to bonds that have already been sold by, or that are subject to a sale by, a city or county. The bill also permits DOC to revise a reallocation made under the bill, but prohibits the revision of any reallocation under which the recipient of a reallocation has adopted a resolution authorizing the issuance of a bond. Under the bill other units of government, including a city, village, town, county; a special purpose district; a state authority, such as the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority, the Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, or the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; or a local housing, redevelopment, or community development authority, may apply to issue bonds under the reallocation of the federal bond limitation as established by DOC.
Under current law, a city, village, or town may issue industrial revenue bonds for certain specified projects. The bill adds to the definition of "project" facilities constructed using the proceeds from a recovery zone facilities bond or from a Midwestern disaster area bond (tax-exempt bonds authorized under the federal Heartland Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2008).
Under current law, the state, regional planning commissions, federally recognized Indian tribes and bands, and local units of government, including municipalities, counties, school districts, and other special purpose districts, may enter into intergovernmental cooperation agreements for the receipt or furnishing of services or joint exercise of powers. This bill adds a housing authority, a redevelopment authority, and a community development authority to the list of entities that may enter into such agreements.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Democrats.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 10 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (7)
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Donald Friske · Republican, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Marlin Schneider · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic Development vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 26, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 90 to 6 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 6”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 32 to 1 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Feb 9, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Feb 5, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 112.
-
Feb 2, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Assembly passed it too, 90 to 6.
-
Jan 28, 2010
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate passed it, 32 to 1.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 1-28-2010” (the official wording)
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
“Placed after Assembly Bill 456 on the calendar 1-28-2010” (the official wording)
-
Jan 26, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Jan 26, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 25, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 7, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 23, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development.
-
Dec 23, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 23, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lassa, Vinehout, Lehman and Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives Molepske Jr., Schneider, Barca, Zigmunt, Friske, Berceau and Zepnick
- Dec 23, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development
- Jan 6, 2010 · Senate
Senator Darling withdrawn as a coauthor
- Jan 7, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 22, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Risser
- Jan 25, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 25, 2010 · Senate
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Placed after Assembly Bill 456 on the calendar 1-28-2010
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 2 offered by Senators Lassa and Miller
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 1-28-2010
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 3 withdrawn and returned to author
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 withdrawn and returned to author
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 adopted
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Read
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 6
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 29, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 1, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Amendment 2)
- Feb 1, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 2)
- Feb 1, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 2-1-2010
- Feb 2, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 2-2-2010
- Feb 5, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 2-5-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 112
- Feb 9, 2010 · Senate
Published 2-18-2010.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote