Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 448

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

a utility terrain vehicle pilot program and making an appropriation.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill establishes a pilot program for the operation of utility terrain vehicles

(UTVs) that is similar to a pilot program for the operation of lightweight utility

vehicles (LUVs) under prior law that expired on September 30, 2009. The bill

requires that the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administer the UTV pilot

program in consultation with the Department of Transportation to investigate the

effects of using UTVs on all-terrain vehicle routes and trails.

Under the bill, a UTV is defined as a motor driven device, other than a golf cart

or low-speed vehicle, that is designed to be used primarily off of a highway and that

has, and was originally manufactured with, certain features, including a gross

weight of more than 900 pounds but not more than 1,999 pounds, a cargo or dump

box, four or more low-pressure tires, non-straddling seats for at least two occupants,

and certain safety systems.

As with the LUV program under prior law, which allowed counties and

municipalities to designate all-terrain vehicle (ATV) routes and trails that may be

used by LUVs, the UTV pilot program allows counties and municipalities to make

such a designation, except that unlike the LUV pilot program, which was limited to

eight specified counties and the municipalities within those counties, the UTV pilot

program is open to any county and the municipalities within those counties. The

program also allows DNR and any federal agency that receives state funds for ATV

projects to designate ATV routes and trails that may be used by UTVs. The UTV pilot

program provides that if a county adopts a resolution electing to participate in the

pilot program, then the resolution applies to all of the municipalities within the

county unless a municipality adopts a resolution to opt out of the program.

Unlike the LUV pilot program, the UTV pilot program prohibits a person from

operating a UTV on a designated ATV route or trail unless the UTV is registered by

DNR. The bill authorizes DNR to register and charge registration fees for UTVs in

the same manner as it registers and charges registration fees for ATVs that are

registered for public use under current law. The bill provides that certain laws that

apply to ATVs under current law apply to UTVs under the pilot program, including

traffic citation laws, rules of operation, prohibitions on operation while intoxicated,

noise limits, and certain equipment requirements. Unlike the LUV pilot program

under prior law, the bill does not require a person who operates a UTV under the UTV

pilot program to have a motor vehicle operator's license but instead prohibits a

person who is younger than 16 from operating a UTV. The bill also requires a person

who is born on or after January 1, 1988, and who operates a UTV to hold a valid

all-terrain vehicle safety certificate.

The bill provides that the UTV pilot program does not apply after June 30, 2012.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Holperin (D) , Jauch (D) , Lassa (D) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D)

10 cosponsors

Hilgenberg (D) , Hubler (D) , Mursau (R) , Ripp (R) , Steinbrink (D) , Suder (R) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D) , Ziegelbauer (I) , Zigmunt (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 0

Passed 6–0 Feb 5, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

Passed 32–0 Feb 23, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 0

Passed 11–0 Mar 4, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 7, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Holperin, Lassa, Taylor, Schultz and Jauch;Cosponsored by Representatives Hubler, Zepnick, Zigmunt, Ziegelbauer, Suder, Mursau, Steinbrink, Ripp and Turner

  2. Jan 7, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 1, 2010 · Senate

    Representative Hilgenberg added as a cosponsor

  6. Feb 4, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 5, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  8. Feb 5, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  11. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  12. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  16. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  19. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  20. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  21. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  22. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  23. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  24. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  28. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-11-2010

  31. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  32. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  33. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 175

  34. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2010