Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 458

The local regulation of ticket selling and providing a penalty

Topics: Amusement, Athletics, Municipality, Sales, University of Wisconsin: Regents

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Mar 2, 2010, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 12, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 2, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not enact an ordinance or adopt a resolution that prohibits the resale of any ticket to an entertainment event or a sporting event if the resale price is equal to or less than the ticket's face value. Also under current law, the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (university) may not promulgate a rule or adopt a resolution prohibiting the resale of any ticket for an amount that is equal to or less than the ticket's face value.

This bill authorizes the university or a local governmental unit (a political subdivision, a professional baseball or football district, or the Bradley Center) to create a resale zone, which is defined as the only part of such an entity's property in which a ticket may be resold.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, if a person is observed violating a political subdivision's resale zone ordinance, or the university's or another local governmental unit's resale zone requirements, the person may be cited for the violation and removed from the premises and, if convicted, is subject to a forfeiture not to exceed the penalty for a Class C forfeiture, which is a civil penalty with a maximum forfeiture of $500. If a person violates a resale zone ordinance or requirement a second time, the person may be permanently prohibited from entering either, or both, of the premises where the violations occurred.

Who's behind it

11 senators are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 12, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 28 to 3 · Mar 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 28, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Failed, 21 to 73 · Mar 4, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to table Assembly amendment 1, Ayes 21, Noes 73”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 4, 2010

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 3-4-2010” (the official wording)

  3. Mar 4, 2010

    “Read” (the official wording)

  4. Mar 2, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  5. Mar 2, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 28 to 3.

  6. Mar 2, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  7. Feb 12, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  8. Feb 12, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1” (the official wording)

  9. Feb 1, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Jan 27, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Jan 14, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Jan 12, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  13. Jan 12, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 12, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Sullivan, Taylor, Wirch, Plale, Holperin, Darling, Lassa, Erpenbach, Olsen, Kanavas and Miller;Cosponsored by Representatives Zepnick, Fields, Schneider, Stone, Turner and Honadel

  2. Jan 12, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 1, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Sullivan

  7. Feb 11, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  9. Feb 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  10. Feb 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  11. Feb 12, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Sullivan

  13. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-2-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  16. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table

  17. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted

  18. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  20. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 28, Noes 3

  21. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  23. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read

  24. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  25. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 3-4-2010

  26. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  27. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  28. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Hubler, Gunderson and Barca

  29. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Refused to table Assembly amendment 1, Ayes 21, Noes 73

  30. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  31. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote