Senate Bill 463
Extending the expenditure period of Tax Incremental District Number 6 in the city of Sheboygan and requiring the Department of Revenue to certify the tax base of Tax Incremental Financing District Number 18 in the city of Waukesha
Topics: Property tax, Revenue, Department of, Sheboygan, City of, Waukesha, City of
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 16, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 22, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 32 to 0
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 4, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 176
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 19, 2010: “Published 3-29-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use development. Currently, towns also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID and the allocation period may be extended. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. Generally, project expenditures may not be made later than five years prior to the termination date of the TID.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, a specific provision allows TID Number 6 in the city of Sheboygan, which was created on January 1, 1992, to make expenditures up to 15 years after the TID was created, or through December 31, 2006. DOR is also authorized by a specific provision to allocate tax increments to this TID for 16 years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made.
Under this bill, the expenditure period for TID Number 6 in the city of Sheboygan is extended to 26 years after the TID was created, or through December 31, 2017. The bill also allows DOR to allocate tax increments to this TID for 31 years after the TID was created, which is the same as current law.
Currently, before a TID may be created, the city or village's application must contain findings that at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use development. The findings, in effect, determine the type of TID that is being created.
With regard to TID Number 18, which the city of Waukesha created, or attempted to create on January 1, 2008, based on action taken by the common council on July 16, 2008, this bill requires that DOR proceed as if the TID was created on January 1, 2008, notwithstanding the fact that the city's findings did not specify the type of TID that was being created. Also under the bill, DOR may not certify a value increment before 2010.
Who's behind it
Mark Miller, a Democrat, is its .
2 more lawmakers .
See all 3 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (2)
- Joe Leibham · Republican, Senate
- Terry Van Akkeren · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 18, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 32 to 0 · Feb 25, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 19, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Mar 16, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 176.
-
Mar 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 4, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 4, 2010
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Feb 26, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 25, 2010
The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.
-
Feb 23, 2010
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)
-
Feb 23, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 23, 2010
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Feb 18, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Feb 11, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 5, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 22, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Miller;Cosponsored by Representative Van Akkeren
- Jan 22, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Feb 5, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 11, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 17, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Senator Leibham added as a coauthor
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 9, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-9-2010
- Mar 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 176
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Published 3-29-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote