Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 463

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

extending the expenditure period of Tax Incremental District Number 6 in the city of Sheboygan and requiring the Department of Revenue to certify the tax base of Tax Incremental Financing District Number 18 in the city of Waukesha.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Currently, towns also have a limited ability to create a TID under

certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and

plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed

TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning

commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project

plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's

proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the

overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or

village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID

terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created,

depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Under certain

circumstances, the life of the TID and the allocation period may be extended. The

costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include

public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site

preparation costs; and professional service costs. Generally, project expenditures

may not be made later than five years prior to the termination date of the TID.

Under current law, a specific provision allows TID Number 6 in the city of

Sheboygan, which was created on January 1, 1992, to make expenditures up to 15

years after the TID was created, or through December 31, 2006. DOR is also

authorized by a specific provision to allocate tax increments to this TID for 16 years

after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made.

Under this bill, the expenditure period for TID Number 6 in the city of

Sheboygan is extended to 26 years after the TID was created, or through December

31, 2017. The bill also allows DOR to allocate tax increments to this TID for 31 years

after the TID was created, which is the same as current law.

Currently, before a TID may be created, the city or village's application must

contain findings that at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is

blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Miller (D)

2 cosponsors

Leibham (R) , Van Akkeren (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Feb 18, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

Passed 32–0 Feb 25, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Miller;Cosponsored by Representative Van Akkeren

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Feb 5, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 11, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Leibham added as a coauthor

  10. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  11. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  12. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  16. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read

  19. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  20. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Mar 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-9-2010

  27. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  28. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 176

  29. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2010