Senate Bill 473
Modifications to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act
Topics: Family: Support, International relations, Interstate compact, Uniform legislation
Became law
The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 22, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 25, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 22, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 321
Latest entry in the official record, May 14, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill updates the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) under current law. UIFSA sets out rules and priorities for the exercise of jurisdiction by courts in this state in actions to establish or enforce spousal or child support obligations, to modify child support obligations, or to determine paternity, when the parties reside in different states or when orders have been issued in different states.
By setting out such rules and priorities, UIFSA aims to eliminate the possibility that conflicting support orders might be issued or enforced by courts in different states.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill primarily reorganizes provisions in current law and makes various nonsubstantive terminology or technical changes and minor substantive changes.
One of the main changes the bill makes is to clarify UIFSA's application to foreign countries, in recognition of and comformity with the ratification by the United States of the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance, concluded at The Hague on November 23, 2007 (convention).
The purpose of the convention is to provide international procedures for enforcing child support orders when the person who is liable for the support and the child do not live in the same country. Whereas under current law "state" is defined to include a "foreign jurisdiction that has enacted a law or established procedures for issuance and enforcement of support orders that are substantially similar to the procedures under .... the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act ...." so that a reference to a "state" in current law includes a reference to a foreign country, this bill eliminates a foreign jurisdiction from the definition of "state" and adds "foreign country" to the statutory text wherever appropriate. For example, current law provides that a court in this state may forward proceedings to, and receive proceedings from, a court of another state, which would include a foreign jurisdiction.
The bill provides that a court in this state may forward proceedings to a court of another state and receive proceedings initiated in another state or a foreign country.
As another example, current law provides that if a proceeding related to child support is brought in this state and two or more child support orders regarding the same child and obligor have been issued by courts of this or another state, a court of this state must apply certain rules to determine which child support order to recognize for purposes of continuing jurisdiction. Under the bill, the court must use the same rules for determining which child support order controls and must be recognized, and adds that one or more of the child support orders may have been issued in a foreign country. In the bill, "foreign country" is defined as a country other than the U.S. that authorizes the issuance of support orders and that has been declared under the laws of the U.S. to be a foreign reciprocating country, that has established a reciprocal arrangement for child support with this state, that has enacted a law or established procedures for issuing and enforcing support orders that are substantially similar to UIFSA, or that is one in which the convention is in force with respect to the U.S.
Among substantive changes to current law, the bill does the following:
1. Provides that a court of this state that enforces current support or collects arrearages of support due under a support order issued in another state or a foreign country must apply the procedures and remedies of this state when doing so.
2. Provides the process and notification requirements when a party registering (filing) a support order issued in another state with a court of this state asserts that two or more support orders are in effect.
3. Provides that in a proceeding to modify a support order issued in another state, the law of the other state governs the duration of the obligation and a court of this state may not impose a further obligation of support.
4. Provides that a court in this state may assume jurisdiction to modify a child support order issued in a foreign country, and bind all individuals who are subject to the court's personal jurisdiction, if the foreign country lacks or refuses to exercise jurisdiction to modify the order, and that the order issued by the court of this state modifying the foreign child support order is the controlling order.
5. Provides procedures for a person to file a direct request for the establishment or modification of a support order involving an obligor, obligee, or child who lives outside the United States.
6. Provides procedures and requirements, in accordance with the convention, for registering with a court in this state a foreign support order or agreement for recognition and enforcement; specifies the types of proceedings that are available under the convention; provides procedures and requirements for contesting a registered support order; provides grounds for a court to refuse to recognize such an order; and, with limited exceptions, prohibits a court in this state from modifying a foreign support order if the obligor remains a resident of the foreign country.
Who's behind it
2 senators are its . All 2 are Democrats.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 6 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- David Cullen · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Bob Ziegelbauer · Independent, Assembly
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 22, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 14, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 13, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 321.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 26, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 26, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 25, 2010
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 25, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 22, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 22, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 8, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 22, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Risser and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Cullen, Ziegelbauer, Berceau and Turner
- Jan 22, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Feb 8, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 15, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Risser
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 22, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 22, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 22, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:43 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 23, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-11-2010
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 321
- May 14, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-26-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote