Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 473

Modifications to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act

Topics: Family: Support, International relations, Interstate compact, Uniform legislation

Became law

The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 22, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 25, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 22, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 321

Latest entry in the official record, May 14, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill updates the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) under current law. UIFSA sets out rules and priorities for the exercise of jurisdiction by courts in this state in actions to establish or enforce spousal or child support obligations, to modify child support obligations, or to determine paternity, when the parties reside in different states or when orders have been issued in different states.

By setting out such rules and priorities, UIFSA aims to eliminate the possibility that conflicting support orders might be issued or enforced by courts in different states.

Read the full summary

The bill primarily reorganizes provisions in current law and makes various nonsubstantive terminology or technical changes and minor substantive changes.

One of the main changes the bill makes is to clarify UIFSA's application to foreign countries, in recognition of and comformity with the ratification by the United States of the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance, concluded at The Hague on November 23, 2007 (convention).

The purpose of the convention is to provide international procedures for enforcing child support orders when the person who is liable for the support and the child do not live in the same country. Whereas under current law "state" is defined to include a "foreign jurisdiction that has enacted a law or established procedures for issuance and enforcement of support orders that are substantially similar to the procedures under .... the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act ...." so that a reference to a "state" in current law includes a reference to a foreign country, this bill eliminates a foreign jurisdiction from the definition of "state" and adds "foreign country" to the statutory text wherever appropriate. For example, current law provides that a court in this state may forward proceedings to, and receive proceedings from, a court of another state, which would include a foreign jurisdiction.

The bill provides that a court in this state may forward proceedings to a court of another state and receive proceedings initiated in another state or a foreign country.

As another example, current law provides that if a proceeding related to child support is brought in this state and two or more child support orders regarding the same child and obligor have been issued by courts of this or another state, a court of this state must apply certain rules to determine which child support order to recognize for purposes of continuing jurisdiction. Under the bill, the court must use the same rules for determining which child support order controls and must be recognized, and adds that one or more of the child support orders may have been issued in a foreign country. In the bill, "foreign country" is defined as a country other than the U.S. that authorizes the issuance of support orders and that has been declared under the laws of the U.S. to be a foreign reciprocating country, that has established a reciprocal arrangement for child support with this state, that has enacted a law or established procedures for issuing and enforcing support orders that are substantially similar to UIFSA, or that is one in which the convention is in force with respect to the U.S.

Among substantive changes to current law, the bill does the following:

1. Provides that a court of this state that enforces current support or collects arrearages of support due under a support order issued in another state or a foreign country must apply the procedures and remedies of this state when doing so.

2. Provides the process and notification requirements when a party registering (filing) a support order issued in another state with a court of this state asserts that two or more support orders are in effect.

3. Provides that in a proceeding to modify a support order issued in another state, the law of the other state governs the duration of the obligation and a court of this state may not impose a further obligation of support.

4. Provides that a court in this state may assume jurisdiction to modify a child support order issued in a foreign country, and bind all individuals who are subject to the court's personal jurisdiction, if the foreign country lacks or refuses to exercise jurisdiction to modify the order, and that the order issued by the court of this state modifying the foreign child support order is the controlling order.

5. Provides procedures for a person to file a direct request for the establishment or modification of a support order involving an obligor, obligee, or child who lives outside the United States.

6. Provides procedures and requirements, in accordance with the convention, for registering with a court in this state a foreign support order or agreement for recognition and enforcement; specifies the types of proceedings that are available under the convention; provides procedures and requirements for contesting a registered support order; provides grounds for a court to refuse to recognize such an order; and, with limited exceptions, prohibits a court in this state from modifying a foreign support order if the obligor remains a resident of the foreign country.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Democrats.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (4)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 22, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 14, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 13, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 321.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 26, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 26, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 25, 2010

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 25, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Feb 22, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Feb 22, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 8, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  13. Jan 22, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Risser and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Cullen, Ziegelbauer, Berceau and Turner

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Feb 8, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 15, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Risser

  5. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 22, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Feb 22, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 22, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  12. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:43 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  19. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  23. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-11-2010

  26. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  27. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 321

  28. May 14, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-26-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote