Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 476

Certification of ironworkers, maximum and minimum numbers of certain individuals performing ironwork at construction sites, granting rule-making authority, and providing penalties

Topics: Commerce, Department of, Contractor, Trades and occupations

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 22, 2010

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

With certain exceptions, under current law, the Department of Commerce (department) establishes and enforces occupational safety standards that apply to places of public employment in this state and the federal occupational safety and health administration (OSHA) establishes and enforces occupational safety standards that apply to places of nonpublic employment in this state. Currently, certain standards promulgated by the department and by OSHA apply to construction sites and other locations where ironwork is performed but the standards do not specifically require ironworkers to be certified or licensed.

This bill establishes programs, administered by the department, for the regulation and certification of ironworkers. These programs are subject to the department receiving all necessary approvals from the federal secretary of labor.

Read the full summary

With certain exceptions, the bill requires any individual who performs work in this state as an ironworker to hold a master ironworker or journeyman ironworker certificate obtained from the department. Under the bill, an ironworker generally means any individual who positions and secures reinforcing rods or cables during on-site construction of buildings or bridges; raises, places, or unites girders, columns, and other structural steel members; installs prefabricated, ornamental metalwork; erects precast girders during on-site construction of bridges; or rigs or raises wind turbines. The bill requires a master ironworker or journeyman ironworker to perform work consistent with department rules. In addition, the bill prohibits an employer, contractor, or subcontractor from allowing certain individuals to perform ironwork without a required ironworker certificate or in violation of department rules.

Under the bill, the department must administer a program for certification of master ironworkers and journeyman ironworkers. The bill establishes minimum criteria that an individual must satisfy in order to be certified as a master ironworker or journeyman ironworker. The bill also includes a grandfather provision that establishes separate criteria for an individual who applies for certification within one year after the bill takes effect.

Unless the grandfather provision applies, in order to be certified as a master ironworker, an individual must: 1) satisfactorily complete a written examination, unless the individual applies for recertification and satisfies specific work experience and training requirements; and 2) hold a valid journeyman ironworker certificate for at least one year before the date of application, unless the individual has successfully completed an approved ironworker apprenticeship program.

Similar requirements apply to an individual who applies for a journeyman ironworker certificate, except that the individual is not required to hold a valid journeyman ironworker certificate before the date of application. Rather, the individual must successfully complete an approved ironworker apprenticeship program or safely complete 8,000 hours of work in the ironworking trade. In addition, upon applying for recertification as a journeyman ironworker, the individual need only have completed one-half as many hours of training as a master ironworker in order to be exempt from the written examination requirement.

The bill requires the department to promulgate rules relating to ironwork.

These rules must specify, among other things, the tasks that master ironworkers and journeyman ironworkers are permitted to perform. In addition, these rules must establish ironworker ratios, specifying a minimum number of master ironworkers that are required to provide work at a construction site and a maximum number of apprentice ironworkers and individuals training as ironworkers that are permitted to provide work at a construction site.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

19 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (19)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 27, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.

  4. Jan 22, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Coggs, Erpenbach, Taylor and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Jorgensen, Mason, Sinicki, Van Akkeren, Parisi, Zepnick, Berceau, Fields, Milroy, Hintz, Hixson, Dexter, Pasch, Turner, Pope-Roberts, Schneider, Smith, Soletski, Young and Vruwink

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  3. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 22, 2010 · Senate

    Representative Pope-Roberts withdrawn as a cosponsor

  5. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate