Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
changing the procedures for filling vacant civil service positions in the city of Milwaukee.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a first class city (presently only Milwaukee) is required to
have a civil service commission (commission). Among the commission's duties is the
responsibility to oversee the civil service examinations given by the city and to keep
lists of eligible persons who take the examinations for civil service positions in the
city. In general, if a vacancy occurs in a nonmanagement civil service position and
if the appointing authority chooses not to fill the vacant position by reinstatement,
promotion, or reduction, the commission is required to certify to the appointing
authority from the list of eligible candidates the three persons ranked highest on the
list, based on examination scores and other requirements established by the
commission, and up to three veterans or spouses of veterans whose grade, plus
veterans preference points, is equal to or higher than the lowest grade on the list of
eligibles. Similarly, if the vacancy occurs in a civil service position that is
managerial, supervisory, or confidential, the commission currently certifies to the
appointing authority the five persons ranked highest on the list or, if the list of
eligible candidates is more than 50, the top 10 percent ranked highest on the list up
to a maximum of ten. A similar number of veterans or spouses of veterans is also
certified under the same procedures that are used for a nonmanagement civil service
position.
Under this bill, for vacancies in all civil service positions, the commission may
certify to the appointing authority any number of eligible candidates ranked highest
on the list, based on rules established by the commission. Also under the bill, all
persons on the list with the same test score must be included on the same
certification.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Apr 14, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 63, Noes 36
Passed 63–36 Apr 28, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 11, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor and Plale;Cosponsored by Representatives Sinicki, Richards, Toles, Fields, A. Williams, Young, Zepnick, Turner, Grigsby and Kessler
- Feb 11, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Feb 20, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 23, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 3, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 19, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 14, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 14, 2009 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Apr 14, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 20, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-23-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 63, Noes 36
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 7:02 A.M. on 4-29-2009 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 8
- Apr 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 6, 2009 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-6-2009
- May 28, 2009 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-28-2009
- May 29, 2009 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-29-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 18
- Jun 5, 2009 · Senate
Published 6-12-2009.