Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 49

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

changing the procedures for filling vacant civil service positions in the city of Milwaukee.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a first class city (presently only Milwaukee) is required to

have a civil service commission (commission). Among the commission's duties is the

responsibility to oversee the civil service examinations given by the city and to keep

lists of eligible persons who take the examinations for civil service positions in the

city. In general, if a vacancy occurs in a nonmanagement civil service position and

if the appointing authority chooses not to fill the vacant position by reinstatement,

promotion, or reduction, the commission is required to certify to the appointing

authority from the list of eligible candidates the three persons ranked highest on the

list, based on examination scores and other requirements established by the

commission, and up to three veterans or spouses of veterans whose grade, plus

veterans preference points, is equal to or higher than the lowest grade on the list of

eligibles. Similarly, if the vacancy occurs in a civil service position that is

managerial, supervisory, or confidential, the commission currently certifies to the

appointing authority the five persons ranked highest on the list or, if the list of

eligible candidates is more than 50, the top 10 percent ranked highest on the list up

to a maximum of ten. A similar number of veterans or spouses of veterans is also

certified under the same procedures that are used for a nonmanagement civil service

position.

Under this bill, for vacancies in all civil service positions, the commission may

certify to the appointing authority any number of eligible candidates ranked highest

on the list, based on rules established by the commission. Also under the bill, all

persons on the list with the same test score must be included on the same

certification.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Plale (D) , Taylor (D)

10 cosponsors

A. Williams (D) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Kessler (D) , Richards (D) , Sinicki (D) , Toles (D) , Turner (D) , Young (D) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Apr 14, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 63, Noes 36

Passed 63–36 Apr 28, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 11, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Taylor and Plale;Cosponsored by Representatives Sinicki, Richards, Toles, Fields, A. Williams, Young, Zepnick, Turner, Grigsby and Kessler

  2. Feb 11, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  3. Feb 20, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 23, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 3, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 19, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Apr 14, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 14, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  9. Apr 14, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 20, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-23-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  11. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Rules

  19. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 63, Noes 36

  23. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 7:02 A.M. on 4-29-2009 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 8

  24. Apr 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. May 6, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-6-2009

  27. May 28, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-28-2009

  28. May 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-29-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 18

  29. Jun 5, 2009 · Senate

    Published 6-12-2009.