Senate Bill 492
Restoration to competency of a defendant (suggested as remedial legislation by the Department of Health Services)
Topics: Court: Procedure, Health Services, Department of: Corrections, Mental health, Statutes: Revision
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 22, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 25, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 25, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 214
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 26, 2010: “Published 5-5-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, if a court has reason to doubt the competency of a defendant in a criminal case, the court may order the defendant to be examined to determine if the defendant is competent. If the examiner finds the defendant incompetent, the examiner's report must include the examiner's opinion as to the likelihood that the defendant will become competent, with treatment, within 12 months (or, if the maximum sentence for the most serious charged offense is shorter than 12 months, within the maximum sentence) and as to whether the defendant's treatment should occur in an inpatient facility, in a jail or locked part of a facility, or as a condition of bail or bond. If the court finds the defendant incompetent the proceedings are suspended. If the court also finds that the defendant will become competent, with treatment, in a certain time frame, the court must commit the defendant to the custody of the Department of Health Services (DHS). The statutes require DHS to determine whether the treatment should occur in a designated location or as a condition of bail or bond. This bill eliminates the option that treatment occur as a condition of bail or bond because, once proceedings are suspended when the person is committed for treatment, bail or bond is not an option. This bill also provides an alternative process for placing a person to an inpatient setting if the person is not appropriate for outpatient treatment.
For further information, see the Notes provided by the Law Revision Committee of the Joint Legislative Council.
Who's behind it
Law Revision Committee is its .
See all the details Hide the names
Author (1)
- Law Revision Committee
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 22, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · Mar 11, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 26, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 214.
-
Apr 20, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 11, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 11, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Mar 9, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 26, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.
-
Feb 26, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 25, 2010
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 22, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 8, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 25, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Jan 25, 2010
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 25, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Law Revision Committee
- Jan 25, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Feb 8, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 22, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 22, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-16-2010
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 214
- Apr 26, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-5-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote