Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
exempting wellness programs from unfair trade or marketing practices.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, an insurer may not engage in any of the following unfair
trade or marketing practices: inducing a person to enter into an insurance contract
by offering benefits not specified in the policy; making an agreement of insurance
that is not clearly expressed in the policy; unfairly discriminating among insureds
by charging different premiums or by offering different terms of coverage except on
the basis of classifications related to the nature and degree of risk covered or the
expenses involved; attempting to influence an employer to refuse employment of an
individual or discharge an employee; or committing any unfair trade practice that
the commissioner defines by rule.
This bill allows an insurer to advertise, market, offer, or operate a wellness
program without violating an unfair trade or marketing practice. A wellness
program is designed to promote health or prevent disease by offering a reward to
insured individuals. If a wellness program contains no conditions for obtaining a
reward based on an individual satisfying a standard that is related to a health factor,
the wellness program is exempt from unfair trade or marketing practice laws if
participation in the program is available to all similarly situated individuals.
Alternately, a wellness program that is based on an individual satisfying a standard
that is related to a health factor is exempt from unfair trade or marketing practice
laws if it has all of the following qualities: the reward does not exceed 20 percent of
the cost of the coverage under the plan; the program is reasonably designed to
promote health or prevent disease; all eligible individuals have the opportunity to
qualify for the reward at least once per year; and the reward is available to all
similarly situated individuals.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Mar 3, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 29, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Sullivan, Darling, Taylor, Schultz, Lazich, Wirch, Cowles and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Zigmunt, Kaufert, Nygren, Vos, Shilling, Molepske Jr., Vruwink, Sinicki, Jorgensen, Turner, Roys, Benedict, Pasch, Montgomery, Cullen, Barca, Soletski, Ripp, Van Roy and Zepnick
- Jan 29, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 8, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1