Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
changing the fees collected by a register of deeds, the redaction of social security numbers from electronic documents, and changes to the land information program.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Administration (DOA) directs and
supervises the land information program and serves as a state clearinghouse for
access to land information. Under the land information program, DOA provides
technical assistance to state agencies and local governmental units with land
information responsibilities, reviews and approves county plans for land records
modernization, and provides aids to counties, derived from recording fee revenues
collected by counties, for land records modernization projects.
Also under current law, a county board may establish a land information office
or direct that the functions and duties of the office be performed by an existing county
office. If a land information office is established, it is required to coordinate land
information projects between different units and levels of government and between
the government and the private sector, develop and receive approval for a
countywide plan for land records modernization, and review and recommend
projects from local governmental units for grants from DOA.
Also under current law, counties collect a fee for recording and filing most
instruments that are recorded or filed with a register of deeds. The fee is $11 for the
first page of an instrument and $2 for each additional page. Counties must remit $7
of each $11 collected for recording or filing the first page of each instrument to DOA,
which DOA uses the revenues to make grants to counties for land records
modernization projects (modernization grants). However, if a county has established
a land information office, receives approval from DOA for its land records
modernization plan, and uses the money for certain specified purposes related to
land records modernization, the county may retain $5 of each $7 fee that would
otherwise be payable to DOA. Counties also collect a $25 fee for recording certain
probate certificates and for preparing and mailing certain probate documents.
Under this bill, counties collect a $25 fee, regardless of the number of pages of
the instrument, for recording or filing most instruments that are recorded or filed
with a register of deeds. Counties must remit $10 of each fee to DOA, which DOA
uses to make modernization grants. If a county has, in addition to the three
requirements under current law for retaining DOA fees, established a land
information council, the county may retain $8 of each $10 fee that would otherwise
be payable to DOA. Also under this bill, counties may temporarily collect a $30 fee
for recording or filing these instruments or for recording certain probate certificates
or preparing and mailing certain probate documents if the county uses $5 of each fee
for purposes of redacting social security numbers from certain electronic format
records. The $30 fee reverts to a $25 fee upon the earliest of the following: 1)
completion of redaction of social security numbers from certain electronic format
records; 2) January 1, 2012, unless an extension of time is granted by DOA; or 3)
January 1, 2015.
Also under this bill, when the register of deeds transfers instruments filed with
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 18, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Mar 12, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 2, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Lehman, Hansen, Kreitlow, Vinehout, Risser and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Soletski, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Smith, Lothian, Townsend, Vruwink, Dexter, Vos, Radcliffe and Van Roy
- Feb 2, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations
- Feb 10, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Erpenbach
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 23, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:58 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roys
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Apr 26, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-26-2010
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 314
- May 14, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-26-2010