Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 507

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

changing the fees collected by a register of deeds, the redaction of social security numbers from electronic documents, and changes to the land information program.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Administration (DOA) directs and

supervises the land information program and serves as a state clearinghouse for

access to land information. Under the land information program, DOA provides

technical assistance to state agencies and local governmental units with land

information responsibilities, reviews and approves county plans for land records

modernization, and provides aids to counties, derived from recording fee revenues

collected by counties, for land records modernization projects.

Also under current law, a county board may establish a land information office

or direct that the functions and duties of the office be performed by an existing county

office. If a land information office is established, it is required to coordinate land

information projects between different units and levels of government and between

the government and the private sector, develop and receive approval for a

countywide plan for land records modernization, and review and recommend

projects from local governmental units for grants from DOA.

Also under current law, counties collect a fee for recording and filing most

instruments that are recorded or filed with a register of deeds. The fee is $11 for the

first page of an instrument and $2 for each additional page. Counties must remit $7

of each $11 collected for recording or filing the first page of each instrument to DOA,

which DOA uses the revenues to make grants to counties for land records

modernization projects (modernization grants). However, if a county has established

a land information office, receives approval from DOA for its land records

modernization plan, and uses the money for certain specified purposes related to

land records modernization, the county may retain $5 of each $7 fee that would

otherwise be payable to DOA. Counties also collect a $25 fee for recording certain

probate certificates and for preparing and mailing certain probate documents.

Under this bill, counties collect a $25 fee, regardless of the number of pages of

the instrument, for recording or filing most instruments that are recorded or filed

with a register of deeds. Counties must remit $10 of each fee to DOA, which DOA

uses to make modernization grants. If a county has, in addition to the three

requirements under current law for retaining DOA fees, established a land

information council, the county may retain $8 of each $10 fee that would otherwise

be payable to DOA. Also under this bill, counties may temporarily collect a $30 fee

for recording or filing these instruments or for recording certain probate certificates

or preparing and mailing certain probate documents if the county uses $5 of each fee

for purposes of redacting social security numbers from certain electronic format

records. The $30 fee reverts to a $25 fee upon the earliest of the following: 1)

completion of redaction of social security numbers from certain electronic format

records; 2) January 1, 2012, unless an extension of time is granted by DOA; or 3)

January 1, 2015.

Also under this bill, when the register of deeds transfers instruments filed with

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Kreitlow (D) , Lehman (D) , Risser (D) , Taylor (D) , Vinehout (D)

11 cosponsors

Dexter (D) , Hebl (D) , Lothian (R) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Radcliffe (D) , Smith (D) , Soletski (D) , Townsend (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Vruwink (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 18, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Mar 12, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 2, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Lehman, Hansen, Kreitlow, Vinehout, Risser and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Soletski, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Smith, Lothian, Townsend, Vruwink, Dexter, Vos, Radcliffe and Van Roy

  2. Feb 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations

  3. Feb 10, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Erpenbach

  5. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  13. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  19. Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  20. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  21. Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  22. Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  23. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:58 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  24. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roys

  26. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table

  27. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  29. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  30. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  32. Apr 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-26-2010

  33. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  34. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 314

  35. May 14, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-26-2010