Senate Bill 517
The Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children
Topics: Children and Families, Department of, Children: Adoption, Children: Protection and services, County: Human services, Interstate compact
Became law
The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 3, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 30 to 0
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 339
Latest entry in the official record, May 14, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children provides procedures for sending a child from this state to another state, placing a child from this state in an institution in another state, bringing a child from another state into this state, and placing a child from another state in an institution in this state.
The bill also creates a new Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children that becomes effective when 35 states enact the compact. The compact applies to the interstate placement of a child who is subject to ongoing court jurisdiction in a sending state due to allegations or findings that the child has been abused, neglected, or deprived and to the interstate placement of a child as a preliminary step to a possible adoption. The compact also applies to the interstate placement of a child who has been adjudicated delinquent or unmanageable and who is subject to the ongoing court jurisdiction of a sending state if the placement of the child is not covered under another interstate compact such as the Interstate Compact for Juveniles or an assessment of the placement is not provided through another compact.
Read the full summary Show less
The compact, however, does not apply to: 1) the interstate placement of a child in a custody proceeding in which a public child placing agency is not a party so long as the placement is not for adoption; 2) the interstate placement of a child by his or her parent so long as the placement is not for adoption; 3) the interstate placement of a child with a relative by a relative who has the authority to make such a placement; or 4) the placement of a child with a noncustodial parent if the court in the sending state finds that the noncustodial parent has a substantial relationship with the child, finds that the placement is in the best interests of the child, and, for a placement in a proceeding in which a public child placing agency is a party, dismisses its jurisdiction over the proceeding. The compact also does not apply to:
1) a child who is entering or leaving the United States for purposes of adoption; 2) cases in which a child living overseas with his or her family, at least one member of which is in the U.S. armed services, is removed and placed in a state; and 3) the sending of a child to another state for a visit.
Under the compact:
1. Subject to certain exceptions for adoptions and for interstate placements in custody proceedings in which a public child placing agency is not a party, the sending state retains jurisdiction over a child with respect to all matters of custody and disposition over which the sending state would have had jurisdiction if the child had remained in the sending state, including the power to order the return of the child.
2. Before a child is sent to a receiving state, the child placing agency of the sending state must request, and a public child placing agency in the receiving state must complete, an assessment of the proposed placement to determine the safety and suitability of the placement.
3. A child may not be placed in a receiving state until a public child placing agency in the receiving state approves the placement, unless a determination not to approve the placement is overturned on administrative or judicial review under the laws of the receiving state.
4. For the interstate placement of a child made by a public child placing agency or state court, the public child placing agency in the sending state is financially responsible for ongoing maintenance payments for the child during the period of the placement and for services for the child beyond the public services for which the child is eligible in the receiving state, and the receiving state is financially responsible for any assessment conducted by the receiving state and for supervision conducted by the receiving state at the level necessary to support the placement as agreed upon by the sending and receiving states.
5. For the placement of a child by a private child placing agency for adoption, the private child placing agency is legally responsible for the child until finalization of the adoption and financially responsible for the child absent a contractual agreement to the contrary.
The bill also creates an Interstate Commission for the Placement of Children (interstate commission) composed of a commissioner from each of the member states appointed by the executive head of the state human services administration with ultimate responsibility for the state's child welfare program. Each member state has one vote on the interstate commission. Under the bill, the interstate commission has various powers, including the power to do all of the following:
1. Promulgate rules to achieve the purposes of the compact. Rules promulgated by the interstate commission are binding in the compacting states to the extent and in the manner provided for in the compact. A majority of the legislatures of the member states may reject a rule. If that is done, the rule has no effect in any of the member states.
2. Provide for dispute resolution among member states and between member states and nonmember states.
3. Levy assessments on member states to cover the costs of the interstate commission's operations and activities.
4. Enforce compliance with the compact or the bylaws or rules of the interstate commission. If a member state defaults in the performance of any of the state's obligations under the compact, the interstate commission may provide remedial training and technical assistance, specify conditions by which the defaulting state must cure its default, enforce compliance with the compact by bringing legal action in federal court against the defaulting state, or avail itself of any other remedies available under state law or the regulation of official or professional conduct.
5. Report annually to the compacting states concerning the activities of the interstate commission during the preceding year.
6. Perform such functions as may be necessary to achieve the purposes of the compact.
A state may withdraw from the compact by repealing the statute that enacted the compact into law in that state. A withdrawal takes effect on the effective date of the repeal of that statute.
Finally, all lawful actions of the interstate commission, including all rules and bylaws promulgated by the interstate commission and agreements between the interstate commission and the member states, are binding on the member states, except that, if a provision of the compact exceeds a constitutional limit imposed on the legislature of a member state, that provision is ineffective in that member state to the extent of the conflict.
Who's behind it
5 senators are its . All 5 are Democrats.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 10 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (5)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Donna Seidel · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 24, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 30 to 0 · Mar 2, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 30, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 14, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 13, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 339.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 3, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 2, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 2, 2010
The Senate passed it, 30 to 0.
-
Feb 25, 2010
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)
-
Feb 25, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 25, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 24, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 17, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 3, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development.
-
Feb 3, 2010
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 3, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Jauch, Holperin, Miller, Lehman and Lassa;Cosponsored by Representatives Seidel, Berceau, Grigsby, Sinicki and Zepnick
- Feb 3, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development
- Feb 17, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-2-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 30, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:32 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Apr 23, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 4-23-2010
- May 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 339
- May 14, 2010 · Senate
Published 5-26-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote