Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 524

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

subpoenas and warrants requiring providers of electronic communications services or of remote computing services to provide customer information or disclose contents of wire or electronic communications.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law a judge may, upon a showing of probable cause, issue a

search warrant authorizing the police to search a designated person, object, or place

for the purpose of seizing specific property. A judge may issue a search warrant

authorizing a search anywhere the state. In addition, a judge may, upon a showing

of probable cause, issue a subpoena requiring a person to produce specified

documents.

This bill authorizes a judge to issue a subpoena or warrant requiring a provider

of electronic communication service or of remote computing service to produce

certain records relating to a customer or the customer's wire or electronic

communications. Under the bill, "remote computing service" means computer

storage or processing provided to the public by means of an electronic

communications system. Upon a showing of probable cause, a court may issue a

subpoena requiring a provider of electronic communication service or of remote

computing service to provide information related to a customer, including the

customer's name, address, telephone number, network address, and bank or credit

card account number used to pay the provider, as well as records of the services the

customer utilized and records of session times and durations. The bill also

authorizes a judge, upon a showing of probable cause, to issue a warrant requiring

a provider of electronic communication service or of remote computing service to

disclose the contents of a customer's wire or electronic communications as well as the

customer information described above.

A judge may issue a subpoena or warrant authorized by the bill to any provider

that enters into an agreement with a person, whether or not the person is a resident

of this state, if any part of the performance of the agreement takes place within this

state. Under the bill, a law enforcement officer need not be present for the service

or execution of the subpoena or warrant. The bill requires that a subpoena or

warrant be issued secretly and provides that a judge may seal the subpoena or

warrant and the request, complaint, affidavit, or testimony upon which the subpoena

or warrant is based. The bill grants a provider of electronic communication service

or of remote computing service immunity from civil liability for acts or omissions

committed in accordance with a subpoena or warrant.

The bill also allows a provider of electronic communication service or of remote

computing service to disclose information relating to a customer or the contents of

a customer's wire or electronic communications if the customer consents, or if the

provider has a good faith belief that disclosure is required to prevent death or serious

physical injury to a person or to mitigate serious physical injury to a person.

Finally, the bill modifies the definition of "wire communication" that is

applicable to the requirement to obtain a warrant before intercepting a wire

communication. Under current law, "wire communication" is defined, in part, as any

aural transfer made through the use of facilities for the transmission of

Sponsors

Introduced by: Darling (R) , Sullivan (D) , Taylor (D)

11 cosponsors

Berceau (D) , Bies (R) , Danou (D) , Fields (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kaufert (R) , Pasch (D) , Richards (D) , Sinicki (D) , Townsend (R) , Turner (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 26, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 9, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Sullivan, Taylor and Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives Pasch, Berceau, Townsend, Danou, Bies, Fields, Turner, Richards, Sinicki, Jorgensen and Kaufert

  2. Feb 9, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 22, 2010 · Senate

    LRB correction

  5. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Sullivan

  6. Mar 25, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Mar 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 26, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:37 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  20. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-23-2010

  27. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  28. May 14, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 349

  29. May 17, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-27-2010