Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 530

Regulating consumer small loans, limiting the areas in which a payday lender may operate, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty

Topics: Banking, Division of, Consumer protection, Financial Institutions, Department of, Forfeiture, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Motor vehicle: Certificate of title, Municipality: Planning, Reports, Small loan

Became law

The governor signed it on May 18, 2010. It's ⁠. Before signing, the governor struck some parts using Wisconsin's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 9, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 62 to 36

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 405

Latest entry in the official record, May 26, 2010: “Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

How the partial veto works

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a lender other than a financial institution (i.e., a bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, or credit union) generally must obtain a license from the Division of Banking (division) in the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) to assess a finance charge greater than 18 percent. This type of lender is generally referred to as a "licensed lender." With certain limited exceptions, current law provides no maximum finance charge for a loan entered into by a licensed lender. A lender who makes payday loans is typically required to be a licensed lender.

In a standard payday loan transaction, the lender accepts a personal check from the borrower, pays the borrower the amount of the check less any applicable finance charge, and agrees to wait a short time, such as two weeks, before depositing the check. Except for the requirement to obtain a license as a licensed lender, current law does not specifically regulate payday loan transactions.

Read the full summary

Licenses.

This bill creates requirements for regulating certain payday loan and similar transactions by prohibiting a person from originating or servicing a "consumer small loan" involving a Wisconsin resident unless the division issues a new license, that is created in the bill, to the person. The bill defines "consumer small loan" as an unsecured consumer loan, including an indebtedness evidenced by a promissory note or an agreement to defer presenting a check or debiting a consumer's bank account for a fee. A separate license is required for each place of business at which a person originates or services a consumer small loan involving a Wisconsin resident. Financial institutions and their affiliates are exempt from the requirement to be licensed under the bill. Also, a person who is licensed under the bill is not required to be licensed as a licensed lender.

Fees.

As under the current law, the bill does not impose any limit on the interest that may charged on a consumer small loan before the maturity date of the loan. The bill defines "maturity date" as the date specified when originating the loan on which the loan is required to be paid in full. However, if a consumer small loan is not paid in full on or before the maturity date, the bill limits the amount of interest that a licensee can charge after the maturity date to not more than 2.75 percent per month. Also, interest may not be assessed on any post-maturity date interest earned by the licensee. The bill also allows a borrower to prepay a consumer small loan in whole or in part. If a loan is prepaid in full, the licensee must, as specified in the bill, refund any unearned interest that has been assessed. In addition, the bill prohibits a licensee from assessing a fee or charge for accessing or using the statewide database described below. Except for a returned check fee, discussed below, the bill does not otherwise affect the fees, charges, or interest that may be assessed by a licensee.

Maximum liability and database.

The bill prohibits a licensee from making a consumer small loan to a borrower that results in the borrower having an outstanding aggregate liability of more than $900 to all licensees who have made loans to the borrower. The bill requires DFI to contract with a third-party provider to operate a single statewide database that licensees may access to determine compliance with the foregoing prohibition. The division must, by rule or order, specify a transaction fee that the database operator must charge licensees for accessing the database. In addition, the bill requires licensees to provide information to the database operator regarding the consumer small loans that they make and close. The bill also creates procedures that licensees must follow in the event that the database is not fully operational or that licensees are unable to access the database. The bill provides that any information in the database regarding a person's transactional history is confidential and not subject to the open records law.

Licensee requirements.

The bill prohibits a licensee from doing any of the following: 1) making a consumer small loan to a borrower with an invalid social security number and 2) making false or deceptive statements regarding consumer small loans. The bill requires a licensee to do all of the following: 1) maintain in force a bond of no more than $5,000 for each place of business at which the licensee makes loans to Wisconsin residents; 2) post their license at each place of business or make them easily viewed on their Internet Web sites; 3) provide written notice to the division of changes of address for places of business; 4) comply with specified record-keeping and reporting requirements; and 5) provide borrowers with specified disclosures in both English and Spanish. The bill allows a licensee to charge a borrower a fee not exceeding $15 for a returned check. Also, while the bill allows a licensee to bring an action against the borrower to collect the amount of a returned check, the bill prohibits a licensee from threatening or pursuing criminal action against the borrower.

Zoning requirements.

Generally under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may engage in zoning and land use planning. This bill imposes some limitations on the locations in which a business, owned by a licensee, that makes consumer small loans (payday lender) may operate. Generally under the bill, a payday lender may not operate in a political subdivision unless it receives a permit to do so from the political subdivision's governing body or zoning agency, and the governing body or zoning agency may not issue a permit to a payday lender if the business would be located within 1,500 feet of another payday lender or if the business would be located within 150 feet of certain residential zoning districts. A political subdivision may, however, enact a zoning ordinance that contains provisions even more restrictive than the conditions established in the bill. Also, if a political subdivision has enacted an ordinance regulating payday lenders that is in effect on the bill's effective date, the political subdivision may continue to enforce that ordinance.

Other requirements.

The bill creates other requirements for consumer small loans, including the following:

1. The bill specifies requirements for license applications, including the payment of a $300 application investigation fee and an annual $500 fee.

2. The bill requires the database to report invalid social security numbers to licensees or the division.

3. The bill allows the division to revoke or suspend licenses based on violations, promulgate rules and issue orders to enforce the bill's requirements, and assess administrative forfeitures of $100 per day against licensees who fail to notify the database operator about loans that are closed.

4. The bill provides that a violation of any of the bill's requirements is a misdemeanor subject to a fine of not more than $500, imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.

5. The bill allows a borrower to recover damages of $250 or the amount of the consumer small loan, whichever is greater, as well as costs and attorney fees, from a person who makes a consumer small loan to the borrower in violation of the bill's requirements.

6. The bill voids any consumer small loan made by a person who does not have a license required under the bill and allows a borrower to recover any amounts paid to such a person.

7. The bill provides that licensees are not subject to civil forfeitures as a result of relying on inaccurate information contained in the database.

8. The bill allows a borrower to repay a consumer small loan with proceeds of a subsequent consumer small loan made by the same or another licensee or an affiliate of the same or another licensee. In addition, if a licensee makes such a subsequent consumer small loan, the bill prohibits the borrower from repaying the subsequent consumer small loan with another consumer small loan made by the same or another licensee or affiliate.

9. The bill allows the division to operate the database described above, as an alternative to contracting with a third-party provider.

Finally, the bill eliminates a requirement under current law that certain annual reports made by licensed lenders to the division must be verified by oath or affirmation. Instead, the bill requires the reports to be made in the form and manner prescribed by the division.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. All 5 are Democrats.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 0 · Apr 7, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 4, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 21 to 12 · Apr 13, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 15 · Apr 13, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 21 to 12 · Apr 13, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 60 to 38 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 60, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 62 to 36 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 62, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 72 to 25 · Apr 22, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 25”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 26, 2010

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. May 24, 2010

    “Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)” (the official wording)

  3. May 20, 2010

    The new law was published.

  4. May 18, 2010

    The governor signed it after striking some parts with a partial veto. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 405.

  5. May 13, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  6. Apr 23, 2010

    “Received from Assembly, Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in” (the official wording)

  7. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too, 72 to 25.

  8. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  9. Apr 22, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Apr 22, 2010

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-22-2010” (the official wording)

  11. Apr 21, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  12. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too, 60 to 38.

  13. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it, 62 to 36.

  14. Apr 20, 2010

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-20-2010” (the official wording)

  15. Apr 15, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  16. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  17. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.

  18. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  19. Apr 8, 2010

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)

  20. Apr 8, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  21. Apr 7, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 1.

  22. Apr 7, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 4, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  23. Mar 18, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  24. Mar 1, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  25. Feb 26, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  26. Feb 9, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions.

  27. Feb 9, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 9, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Sullivan, Hansen, Miller, Lehman and Robson;Cosponsored by Representative Fields

  2. Feb 9, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions

  3. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 1, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 18, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    LRB correction

  7. Apr 2, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Sullivan

  8. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 4, Noes 0

  10. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 3, Noes 1

  11. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  13. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  14. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  15. Apr 12, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Carpenter, Ellis and Grothman

  16. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  17. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  18. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter

  19. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  20. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter

  21. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  22. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Leibham and Grothman

  23. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected

  24. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Leibham and Grothman

  25. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  26. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  27. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  29. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  30. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  32. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  33. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler, Richards, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Soletski, Hixson, Mason, Vruwink, Milroy, Hilgenberg, A. Williams, Grigsby, Pasch, Sinicki, Benedict and Toles

  34. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:02 P.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  35. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-20-2010

  36. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  37. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  38. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Hintz, Seidel, Zepnick, Jorgensen, Fields and Smith

  39. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 62, Noes 36

  40. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  41. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  42. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 60, Noes 38

  43. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  44. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  45. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  46. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  47. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-22-2010

  48. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 offered by Senator Sullivan

  49. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  50. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Assembly amendment 2 concurred in as amended

  51. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  52. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 adopted)

  53. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 25

  54. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  55. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly, Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in

  56. May 4, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-4-2010

  57. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  58. May 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor with partial veto on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 405

  59. May 20, 2010 · Senate

    Published 6-1-2010

  60. May 24, 2010 · Senate

    Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)

  61. May 26, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote