Senate Bill 530
Regulating consumer small loans, limiting the areas in which a payday lender may operate, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty
Topics: Banking, Division of, Consumer protection, Financial Institutions, Department of, Forfeiture, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Motor vehicle: Certificate of title, Municipality: Planning, Reports, Small loan
Became law
The governor signed it on May 18, 2010. It's . Before signing, the governor struck some parts using Wisconsin's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 9, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 62 to 36
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 405
Latest entry in the official record, May 26, 2010: “Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Partial veto
Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a lender other than a financial institution (i.e., a bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, or credit union) generally must obtain a license from the Division of Banking (division) in the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) to assess a finance charge greater than 18 percent. This type of lender is generally referred to as a "licensed lender." With certain limited exceptions, current law provides no maximum finance charge for a loan entered into by a licensed lender. A lender who makes payday loans is typically required to be a licensed lender.
In a standard payday loan transaction, the lender accepts a personal check from the borrower, pays the borrower the amount of the check less any applicable finance charge, and agrees to wait a short time, such as two weeks, before depositing the check. Except for the requirement to obtain a license as a licensed lender, current law does not specifically regulate payday loan transactions.
Read the full summary Show less
Licenses.
This bill creates requirements for regulating certain payday loan and similar transactions by prohibiting a person from originating or servicing a "consumer small loan" involving a Wisconsin resident unless the division issues a new license, that is created in the bill, to the person. The bill defines "consumer small loan" as an unsecured consumer loan, including an indebtedness evidenced by a promissory note or an agreement to defer presenting a check or debiting a consumer's bank account for a fee. A separate license is required for each place of business at which a person originates or services a consumer small loan involving a Wisconsin resident. Financial institutions and their affiliates are exempt from the requirement to be licensed under the bill. Also, a person who is licensed under the bill is not required to be licensed as a licensed lender.
Fees.
As under the current law, the bill does not impose any limit on the interest that may charged on a consumer small loan before the maturity date of the loan. The bill defines "maturity date" as the date specified when originating the loan on which the loan is required to be paid in full. However, if a consumer small loan is not paid in full on or before the maturity date, the bill limits the amount of interest that a licensee can charge after the maturity date to not more than 2.75 percent per month. Also, interest may not be assessed on any post-maturity date interest earned by the licensee. The bill also allows a borrower to prepay a consumer small loan in whole or in part. If a loan is prepaid in full, the licensee must, as specified in the bill, refund any unearned interest that has been assessed. In addition, the bill prohibits a licensee from assessing a fee or charge for accessing or using the statewide database described below. Except for a returned check fee, discussed below, the bill does not otherwise affect the fees, charges, or interest that may be assessed by a licensee.
Maximum liability and database.
The bill prohibits a licensee from making a consumer small loan to a borrower that results in the borrower having an outstanding aggregate liability of more than $900 to all licensees who have made loans to the borrower. The bill requires DFI to contract with a third-party provider to operate a single statewide database that licensees may access to determine compliance with the foregoing prohibition. The division must, by rule or order, specify a transaction fee that the database operator must charge licensees for accessing the database. In addition, the bill requires licensees to provide information to the database operator regarding the consumer small loans that they make and close. The bill also creates procedures that licensees must follow in the event that the database is not fully operational or that licensees are unable to access the database. The bill provides that any information in the database regarding a person's transactional history is confidential and not subject to the open records law.
Licensee requirements.
The bill prohibits a licensee from doing any of the following: 1) making a consumer small loan to a borrower with an invalid social security number and 2) making false or deceptive statements regarding consumer small loans. The bill requires a licensee to do all of the following: 1) maintain in force a bond of no more than $5,000 for each place of business at which the licensee makes loans to Wisconsin residents; 2) post their license at each place of business or make them easily viewed on their Internet Web sites; 3) provide written notice to the division of changes of address for places of business; 4) comply with specified record-keeping and reporting requirements; and 5) provide borrowers with specified disclosures in both English and Spanish. The bill allows a licensee to charge a borrower a fee not exceeding $15 for a returned check. Also, while the bill allows a licensee to bring an action against the borrower to collect the amount of a returned check, the bill prohibits a licensee from threatening or pursuing criminal action against the borrower.
Zoning requirements.
Generally under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may engage in zoning and land use planning. This bill imposes some limitations on the locations in which a business, owned by a licensee, that makes consumer small loans (payday lender) may operate. Generally under the bill, a payday lender may not operate in a political subdivision unless it receives a permit to do so from the political subdivision's governing body or zoning agency, and the governing body or zoning agency may not issue a permit to a payday lender if the business would be located within 1,500 feet of another payday lender or if the business would be located within 150 feet of certain residential zoning districts. A political subdivision may, however, enact a zoning ordinance that contains provisions even more restrictive than the conditions established in the bill. Also, if a political subdivision has enacted an ordinance regulating payday lenders that is in effect on the bill's effective date, the political subdivision may continue to enforce that ordinance.
Other requirements.
The bill creates other requirements for consumer small loans, including the following:
1. The bill specifies requirements for license applications, including the payment of a $300 application investigation fee and an annual $500 fee.
2. The bill requires the database to report invalid social security numbers to licensees or the division.
3. The bill allows the division to revoke or suspend licenses based on violations, promulgate rules and issue orders to enforce the bill's requirements, and assess administrative forfeitures of $100 per day against licensees who fail to notify the database operator about loans that are closed.
4. The bill provides that a violation of any of the bill's requirements is a misdemeanor subject to a fine of not more than $500, imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.
5. The bill allows a borrower to recover damages of $250 or the amount of the consumer small loan, whichever is greater, as well as costs and attorney fees, from a person who makes a consumer small loan to the borrower in violation of the bill's requirements.
6. The bill voids any consumer small loan made by a person who does not have a license required under the bill and allows a borrower to recover any amounts paid to such a person.
7. The bill provides that licensees are not subject to civil forfeitures as a result of relying on inaccurate information contained in the database.
8. The bill allows a borrower to repay a consumer small loan with proceeds of a subsequent consumer small loan made by the same or another licensee or an affiliate of the same or another licensee. In addition, if a licensee makes such a subsequent consumer small loan, the bill prohibits the borrower from repaying the subsequent consumer small loan with another consumer small loan made by the same or another licensee or affiliate.
9. The bill allows the division to operate the database described above, as an alternative to contracting with a third-party provider.
Finally, the bill eliminates a requirement under current law that certain annual reports made by licensed lenders to the division must be verified by oath or affirmation. Instead, the bill requires the reports to be made in the form and manner prescribed by the division.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
5 senators are its . All 5 are Democrats.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 6 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (1)
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 7 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 4 to 0 · Apr 7, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 4, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 21 to 12 · Apr 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 15 · Apr 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 21 to 12 · Apr 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 60 to 38 · Apr 20, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 60, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 62 to 36 · Apr 20, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 62, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 72 to 25 · Apr 22, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 25”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 26, 2010
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
May 24, 2010
“Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)” (the official wording)
-
May 20, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 18, 2010
The governor signed it after striking some parts with a partial veto. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 405.
-
May 13, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 23, 2010
“Received from Assembly, Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in” (the official wording)
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Assembly passed it too, 72 to 25.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 22, 2010
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-22-2010” (the official wording)
-
Apr 21, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The Assembly passed it too, 60 to 38.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The Assembly adopted it, 62 to 36.
-
Apr 20, 2010
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-20-2010” (the official wording)
-
Apr 15, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly received it.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 8, 2010
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)
-
Apr 8, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Apr 7, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 1.
-
Apr 7, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 4, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 18, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 1, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 26, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 9, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions.
-
Feb 9, 2010
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 9, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Sullivan, Hansen, Miller, Lehman and Robson;Cosponsored by Representative Fields
- Feb 9, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 1, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 18, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
LRB correction
- Apr 2, 2010 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Sullivan
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 4, Noes 0
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions, Ayes 3, Noes 1
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 12, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Carpenter, Ellis and Grothman
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Leibham and Grothman
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Leibham and Grothman
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler, Richards, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Soletski, Hixson, Mason, Vruwink, Milroy, Hilgenberg, A. Williams, Grigsby, Pasch, Sinicki, Benedict and Toles
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 12:02 P.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-20-2010
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Hintz, Seidel, Zepnick, Jorgensen, Fields and Smith
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 62, Noes 36
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 60, Noes 38
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 2 adopted
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-22-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 offered by Senator Sullivan
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 adopted
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Assembly amendment 2 concurred in as amended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 adopted)
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 25
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 23, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly, Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 concurred in
- May 4, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-4-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 18, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor with partial veto on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 405
- May 20, 2010 · Senate
Published 6-1-2010
- May 24, 2010 · Senate
Partial veto placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82(2)(a)
- May 26, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pending partial veto notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Partial veto
Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Partial veto
Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote