Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 531

Annual or consecutive month permits for vehicles or combinations of vehicles transporting loads near the Wisconsin-Michigan border

Topics: Ashland County, Bayfield County, Bus and truck: Taxation or registration, Iron County, Road, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on May 6, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 9, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 22, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 229

Latest entry in the official record, May 10, 2010: “Published 5-19-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate upon a highway any vehicle or combination of vehicles that exceeds certain statutory limits on size, weight, or load unless that person possesses a permit issued by the Department of Transportation (DOT). DOT may issue an annual or consecutive month permit (Michigan border permit) for an oversize or overweight vehicle or combination of vehicles to: 1) transport loads within 11 miles of the Wisconsin-Michigan state line; or 2) transport certain forest products on USH 2 in Iron County or Ashland County or in Bayfield County from the Ashland County line through Hart Lake Road, if the vehicle or vehicle combination is traveling between this state and Michigan and does not violate Michigan law.

This bill allows a vehicle or vehicle combination operating under a Michigan border permit under the circumstances described in item 2), above, to operate solely within Wisconsin, eliminating the requirement that the vehicle or vehicle combination be traveling between Wisconsin and Michigan. However, if the vehicle or vehicle combination is traveling between Wisconsin and Michigan, it is still subject to the requirement that it not be in violation of Michigan law.

Read the full summary

Because this bill concerns an exception to the vehicle weight limits specified in ch. 348, stats., the Department of Transportation, as required by law, will prepare a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.

Who's behind it

Robert Jauch, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

  • Sherman

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Apr 5, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 10, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 6, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 229.

  3. May 4, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Apr 22, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Apr 14, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Apr 14, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Apr 12, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Apr 5, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  12. Mar 25, 2010

    “Department of Transportation Weight Impact Study report received pursuant to s. 13.096, Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  13. Mar 10, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Feb 9, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  15. Feb 9, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 9, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Jauch;Cosponsored by Representative Sherman

  2. Feb 9, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Mar 10, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 25, 2010 · Senate

    Department of Transportation Weight Impact Study report received pursuant to s. 13.096, Wisconsin Statutes

  5. Apr 1, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 5, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Apr 5, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Jauch

  10. Apr 12, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:46 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  20. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  21. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. May 3, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-3-2010

  28. May 4, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-4-2010

  29. May 6, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-5-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 229

  30. May 10, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-19-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote